how the FUCK do Lincoln's depreciate so badly This is a

because unless its a licoln continental with suicide doors its a piece of trash ford with a cadillac price tag

>>15912446
Because it had 35k miles put on it in less than one year.

Just about any car will lose a lot of its value rolling off a lot, especially appliance grade cars. Lincoln is one of these, even if an old person might have died in it.

>>15912446

because its a ford with a fancy grille

>fwd

>>15912472
That's GOOD, you idiot. That means they're literally all highway miles. As long as he changed the oil regularly, that powertrain is as good as the day it rolled off the assembly line.

>>15912446
honestly 20k for that car sounds like a steal


you look well off enough to buy a brand new lincoln, even if you paid civic prices for it

10/10 would buy

>>15912889
Oh sweet summer child

>>15912924
>I don't understand how engines work

That'd be an awesome comfy commuter to scoop up lightly used, price is quite tempting. I'm normally a strict function over form kind of a guy but I think these MKZs look freaking gorgeous.

>>15912924

My best guess is that it might be ex-fleet (read: rental).

There's nothing inherently bad about x amount of miles more than average getting put on a car in a year, but it does hint at fleet use.