ITT: characteristics of a car that immediately make you 180

>>15827616
>I'm going to make this thread because I drive a miata
>I'm also retarded
The post.

File: 154754741.jpg (57KB, 637x354px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 637x354px

>go to buy a new car
>only a V8 is avaliable

>>15827621
>miatas are MR

the only retard is you

>>15827632
You can't be serious

>>15827674
go be underage elsewhere.

>>15827616
>weighs more than 2000lbs

So, nearly every single car?

>mid or rear engined two seater that weighs under a ton
There are like 5 production cars ever made that fit that description and they're all old and slow as hell

File: maxresdefault-3.jpg (374KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 2048x1365px

>>15827616
>mfw the ecoboost radical achieves all of this

>>15827684
>this is what nu males think

sigh...
>>15827695
never said it had to be a production car bucko

>>15827698
>four seats

>>15827699
>never said it had to be a production car bucko
Didn't imply that you did, either. Try learning to read?

File: 1354938265391.jpg (121KB, 408x408px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 408x408px

>>15827616
>hooptie

>>15827708
Actually, you did in fact imply that by quoting me, so shut your trap.

>>15827616
>Everyone who doesn't own the same make and model as I do is an idiot

Welp, the spirit of /o/ seems alive and well

>>15827738
>picking a car with faults because muh snowflake mentality

jesus christ neck yourself

>>15827616
My car is 2100 pounds, has no driver assists, is rear wheel drive, 2 door, manual, and is front engine but has 50/50 weight distribution. Is this acceptable?

>>15827755
depends. what car?

>>15827763
fb rx7

>>15827698
>ecoboost
>radical

pick 1

>>15827771
Both, dumbass

>>15827745
>only special snowflakes can enjoy something that I don't

okay then

>>15827616
So you're a bus cuck, but only because no affordable RWD in Miami?

>>15827616
What possible car could fit this criteria? Even the 818 is too tall IIRC. Fuck the gt40 is too tall.

>>15827616
You have described an old F1 car.
Nothing is 30in or less tall

>>15827616

>Big gay touchscreen in dash
>Push button start
>Shit visibility
>Driver assist shit and backup camera
>Lots of buttons on the steering wheel

File: when your tires are smoking.png (140KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 300x300px

>>15827616

>>15827933
Calm down grandpa.

>>15827894
>>15827915
I think he's talking about ground clearance. Lifted trucks are not okay.

>>15827616
>I can't afford a new car so I get mad when I see other people driving them

>>15827616
>engine is longitudinal and slung out ahead of the front axle
Who ever thought this was a good idea?

>>15827616

>its an "my extremely specific niche sport is the only legitimate use for a motor vehicle" episode

>>15827616
What the fuck do you even drive?

File: meme.png (105KB, 392x243px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 392x243px

>car exists

>>15827616
>ITT: characteristics of a car that immediately make you 180
u mean 360

there isn't really a single car that fits these

>sub 2000 lb
>NON TRANSVERSE
>NOT FRONT ENGINE
>NOT FWD

you want a longitudinal MR or RR that weighs less than 2000lbs.

so op drives an air cooled 911? even those are 2400+ lb

my civic hatch is right at 2000lb. but obviously its
>4 seats
>fwd

>>15827755
>50/50 weight distribution meme

File: exige.jpg (217KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 1200x675px

>>15832867
exige with a V8 swap

>>15832892
Exige is heaver than 2000lbs. An atom v8 fits the bill

File: cvt-8.jpg (53KB, 400x380px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 400x380px

>all these autistic requirements

jesus, you guys.

the only thing i instantly walk away from is

>cvt's

>>15827623
It's ok, we all know you can't resist your cuck temptations to buy a turbo instead of actual power like the little faggot you are

>>15832881
Why is it so bad? How is it that you, an autistic NEET, knows better than countless billion dollar automakers who have been doing it for decades?

What do you think is good? Can you explain why other than some faggot telling you that 50/50 is shit because he's a salty faggot in a cuck-mobile?

>>15827616
So you only drive old MR2s lmao

Wow OP we should strive to emulate you

>>15833718
50/50 isn't ideal for performance, but marketing teams hammer it as the pinnacle of good chassis design for obvious reasons
Rear bias is god tier
50 50 is just "easy" for the driver because it's evenly balanced

>>15833718
>trying to defend MacPherson Strut
>trying to defend Haldex
>trying to defend the rampant orange peel
>trying to defend the shift to FWD
>trying to defend crossovers
>trying to defend 4-door coupes
>trying to defend "clean diesel"
>trying to defend a gradual shift to torsion bar rear suspension
>defending the BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer
I could go on all night

>>15833702
Did you seriously type this post out and think "yes, this actually makes sense" before submitting it

File: Rover_P5_coupé.jpg (1MB, 2032x1524px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2032x1524px

>>15833765
4 door coupés have existed for decades dumb amerishart

>>15833853
So has homosex but that doesn't make it okay.

File: carnegie-hall---john-and-hank-green-2---credit-andrea-fischman-3_4.jpg (56KB, 534x712px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 534x712px

>>15833905
Here you go

>>15832827
>car has two drummers

>>15833765
torsion bar suspension is fine. perhaps you mean torsion beam?