Why haven't they made a car that has the same acceleration and weight as a supermoto but the safety and handling of a normal sports car?
>>15818791
That's the dumbest shit I heard all day Bobby. Have you ever driven a car?
>>15818791
I mean, there are attempts to split the difference...
>>15818791
>same acceleration and weight as a supermoto
Good luck with making a car that weighs 120kg
>>15819328
carbon fiber is essentially weightless so just make the car mostly carbonfiber
>>15820941
>but with the safety
>>15820941
>>15820941
F1 cars are mostly carbon fiber but are still nowhere near 120kg
>>15818791
>why haven't they made a car that has the same acceleration and weight as a lightweight motorcycle
>made a car with the same weight as a motorcycle
Even the lightest cars (think Caterham, Radicals etc) weigh 400+kg, good luck getting a "car" down to ~100kg wet.
You can't make a car with the same characteristics as a bike, that's just stupid. If you want the characteristics of a motard, buy or build one yourself.
Bikes =/= cars like apples =/= oranges, you can't have your cake and eat it too.
2/10 I replied.
>>15820941
Even the engine and drivetrain and wiring harness and everything.
WEIGHT REDUCTION BRAH
>tfw you will never chase down Clowns at 300km, bash in heads with lead pipes and enjoy a blazing metropolis like Neo-Tokyo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_NO4znTZZk
>>15818791
Depends on your definition of "car". This is the closest you're going to get.
>>15821111
its not stupid if people have just been too afraid to try it
people thought smartphones were stupid until apple tried nd now everyone has iphones
>>15821596
Smartphones aren't impossible though, and they were around before Apple had anything to do with them.
Re-reading through your original post it seems you don't even fully understand what a sumo is or why they are how they are.
You go build a car that weighs ~100kg and is equally as safe as a modern car and get back to me, m'kay?
Here's your (You).
>>15818791