itt: the best mass produced motors of the past 10 years personal

File: IMG_1030.jpg (146KB, 1024x586px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 1024x586px

>cluttered with electronics
>m-muh VANOS SOLENOIDS

yeah, no

the S62 is better.

File: thats-a-350.jpg (49KB, 480x320px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 480x320px

Early 90s LT1 350 Small block Chevy

Stock make over 300 HP, easy to make over 500 on the stock bottom end with boost, they're basically falling out of the sky and they can be had for $800 or less. They can be built to LS spec for far less than an LS costs, and can be carbureted if you're a massive hipster. The greatest mass produced engine in recent history at this very date, but will fall out of relevancy and will be replaced by the LS in my mind about 5-10 years from now.

>>15677522
Had a lt1 in my impala that had 600rwhp and no way I'd pick it over like a 5.3 6.0 ls.

>>15677569
An LS is objectively better except for actually buying one. The hype, being relatively new, and so many iron 4.8/5.3/6.0's are still on the road drive the price up for sure.

File: HPNX3012.jpg (163KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1024x768px

4G63T w/ VVT ("MIVEC")

Barely within the 10-year window but goddamn that engine makes me moist.

File: 20160822_215032.png (1022KB, 720x828px) Image search: [Google]

1022KB, 720x828px

2zzge

File: 2nd_generation_2A_engine.jpg (968KB, 2592x1944px) Image search: [Google]

968KB, 2592x1944px

/thread

GM L59 and LM7 5.3 v8
GM Vortec 5.7

Indestructible

>>15677602
Yamaha makes a great engine, it's just too bad they had to use that oil burning rod tossing pos toyota bottom end.

>>15677610
>oil burning rod tossing pos toyota bottom end
This is not a thing

>>15677604
>2A in the past ten years?
I dont think so tim

>>15677569
I think you're missing my point, which is that it's an extremely cheap and reasonably capable engine, available everywhere. The LS is more expensive, but lighter and more capable. I just don't think the LS is worth the extra money.

File: bb0c0ca098e8382097e8ccb3a4b208f0.jpg (50KB, 382x487px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 382x487px

Foreverrrr

>>15677347
>posts m3 v8

I suggest you look into all the oiling issues owners have been having. It's subaru tier (spun rod bearings).

>>15677659
I was going to post a redblock, but its too old.

File: anigif_enhanced-buzz-8938-1398274443-10.gif (3MB, 490x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 490x480px

>>15677710
Me too, so I picked the next best thing!

File: 2zz+oil.jpg (100KB, 1055x699px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1055x699px

>>15677614
Sure thing boss
http://www.toyotacelicas.com/forums/96-seventh-generation/53345-1zz-2zz-oil-burn-problem-inevitable.html

>>15677777
fuck what a waste of a get

>>15677694
funny you say this as my weekend car is an STi

File: 2006-volvo-c70-t5-25-liter-turbocharged-inline-5-engine-photo-39683-s-1280x782[1].jpg (103KB, 1280x782px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1280x782px

>>15677659
based T5

>>15677777
After 03 they were fine

>>15677794
I came looking for the get post.. how disappointing.

File: Barra.jpg (68KB, 682x681px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 682x681px

Ford Barra Turbo
>4.0L I6
>Block has been continually developed from the 1950s Ford I6
>Likewise, the top end has evolved from reverse-flow OHV to crossflow OHV to SOHC and finally DOHC with VCT
>Factory cross-bolted mains
>Offered factory with up to 325 kW and 576 N/m (436hp; 425lb/ft)
>Can be boosted above 1000kW

It's sad that production ends this year.

File: 4L_Ih472PeJ.jpg (40KB, 595x335px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 595x335px

>>15677347
Obligatory.
>8,250 RPM in a V8

File: turbox.jpg (30KB, 431x411px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 431x411px

LC2
C
2

File: 874.jpg (48KB, 552x414px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 552x414px

/thread

>>15677586
Sirius is still used in chinkcars.

>>15678189
While I agree the M88 is a great engine, it wasn't made in the last 10 years.

File: 1470552180165.jpg (128KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1000x667px

/thread

Go home V8 cucks.

>>15678224
6.2> eco boost all day.
Those things just drive you around town at decent (16-17mpg average) but when it's time to do work.kek

>>15678183
>This engine's potential was cut short due to space issues in the Mustang

Imagine if Ford went through with engineering the GT to fit this...

>>15677586
muh nigga

>>15677347
F20C anybody?

>>15678509
Do you know what a decade is?

>>15678224
"Eco boost" is the best automotive oxymoron around.

Anyone who has ever owned or driven anything with a turbo gets the joke. Good thing for FORD is there are plenty of fucking idiots who think they'll actually get better power, longevity, and mpgs with a turbo.

>>15677347
AMC i6 last used in 2006 wrangler

>>15677602
>dat displacement/output ratio
>dat toyota/honda best of both worlds
We need a 2.2zz

File: CFPR00351_Engine_Infographic.jpg (2MB, 1275x1650px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1275x1650px

>>15678481
They would have easily added 200 pounds in unnecessary weight????
>>15679378
Pic related. Stay triggered, V8 cuck

File: bmw_engines__images_1.jpg (1MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1536px

>>15677347

File: 800px-2006_Saturn_Ion_Red_Line_engine.jpg (90KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 800x600px

GM LSJ.
>hailed as next generation Chevy small block
>bulletproof reliable
>boosted
>easy to work on, can replace engine internals without removing the engine
>easy to get more power from
>capable of LARGE amounts of power with no modification to the block
>was on Ward's 10 best engines list in 2006

>>15677347
>V8
>under 300 torque

My 2.3 liter 4banger have 372

>>15679933
>comparing turbo to NA

>>15677347
>tfw all the cars I own were mass produced more than 10 years ago

>>15679950
Being this defensive that a 4 liter V8 is weaker than a 2.3 4banger when it comes to torque.

Is the S65 that embarrassing?

>>15679950
Oh wait, the S65B44 is 4.4 liter and have the same Nm as my old 2.3 liter 4banger with a $140 software tune.

File: unedited2.jpg (75KB, 1090x614px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1090x614px

>>15677371
S62 is pretty dope, yeah

then again, i sometimes touch myself at nigh at the thought of the S85

>>15679969
>>15679987
>so asshurt he assumes I'm fanboying immediately
lol
BMW fanboys aren't the only people who realize comparing NA to Turbo is stupid you know.

When you grow up and learn a thing or two about engines you'll learn

>>15680017
There's one thing to learn.

X engine is worse than X+Turbo
If you want to see that S65 somewhat good, turbo convert it.

>>15680034
>hurr durr it's not good because it doesn't make 600hp
Boy racer child who has never driven a decent car detected

>>15680049
I never said anything about HP needing to exceed 600.
But when peak torque is lower than HP it's something wrong.

File: 129150517831427620.jpg (105KB, 560x358px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 560x358px

>>15680057
>But when peak torque is lower than HP it's something wrong.
Holy shit this just keeps getting funnier

File: maxresdefault.jpg (252KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 1920x1080px

>>15680057
>But when peak torque is lower than HP it's something wrong.
>this literal child thinks there's something wrong with this car because it makes 1140hp and 885ft-lb even though it's faster, better quality, more interesting, just overall objectively superior to anything he'll ever drive let alone lay his hands on

Chevy 350

>>15678509
You mean F22C?

>>15680067
>I want my car to be useless unless I rev it to boy-racer VTECH JUST KICKED IN YO levels.

>>15680079
>1200 Nm at 4100
>1200 is somehow less than 1140
You're not a bright person.

>S65B40 4 liter 414HP only 400Nm.
>S65B44 4.4 liter 444HP only 440Nm.

>>15679375
It was produced until 2009

File: laughing whores.jpg (44KB, 446x400px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 446x400px

>>15680093
>now he's changing units to try and make his stupid point

>>15680057
>But when peak torque is lower than HP it's something wrong.
Clearly there's something wrong with F1 engines.

>>15680093
Why are you using imperial and metric units?

>>15680111
Your imperial shit system is retarded and even with the glorious Metric system your engine can't have more torque than HP.

It was never about which unit, I had Nm in mind all the time, but used burgerfats unit just to make it easier for you to understand.

>>15680131
Clearly you're retarded.
Or do you rev your engine to 18K RPM for DD driving?

>>15680087
>only revs to 8k
>lower Hp/L
No.

>>15680137
Of all my years spent on /o/ I've never seen someone in so much damage control.

File: 3c0.jpg (188KB, 650x650px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 650x650px

>>15680183
>losing argument like a bitch

>>15677522
>Early 90s
>past 10 years

nope

File: K20C1.jpg (32KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 800x533px

2.0L
306 hp @ 6500
300 lbft @ 2500-4500
39 mpg avg

>>15677659
Stop stealthposting mlp m8

>>15677371
vanos solenoids are like a 20 minute job asshat

>>15680341
>turbo exhaust outlet dumps directly into catalytic converter
Holy Emissions cucks batman

>>15680137
>Not reving to redline everyday
holy shit does any cuck drive like this everyday? Do you enjoy not using your car? may i suggest a bicycle or better yet a prius

>>15680376
>cleaner exhaust is bad

idiot

>>15680382
there's a difference between enjoying your car and beating the shit out of the engine on a daily basis severely lowering its life span

>>15680376
>>15680382
>looks like someone learned to use the new buzzword that all the cool kids are using

>>15680376
>capitalized mid-sentence "Emissions"
fucking phonefags

>>15680376
Yet Honda has better emissions as a company compared to the rest.

>>15680545
fuck You

>>15680137
>quoted metric torque
>quoted imperial horsepower
LOL

>>15681626
PS and HP are close enough.
Not enough people understand kW anyway.

>>15679378
Go back to 2009, when those were actually valid concerns

They said the same thing about electronic fuel injection

>>15679677
i will swap one of these into a different car one day. Its going to happen. Just a matter of time. My favorite engine ever

>>15677371
TIMING CHAIN GUIDES

>>15677371
>>m-muh VANOS SOLENOIDS
God fuck those so fucking much.

Everyone is having to replace them at like 70k miles. At least it's an easy job.

>>15679426
FERD PUT THE ECHOBOOST IN THE MUSTANG PLS FERD

File: bmw_biturbo0142.jpg (55KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1024x768px

N54 from the 2006-2009/10 E9X 335.. This thing can put out over 650whp from the factory without needing any internal mods!! Its all forged from factory except for the latest of the batch before they switched to the N55 which also is good but isnt forged.
There are people that have hit over 800whp with this also without opening and that is almost unheard of for a consumer engine.

Now to achive this you gotta ofc put some money into it,, Upgraded twins will get you to about 550Whp with a nice even pull all the way. Want more? Well then you gotta go single turbo, bit more laggy but the power potential is alot higher.

>>15677797
>>15677347
http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=945034

Whelp, you sure know how to pick'em.

>>15680341
Where are you getting these 300+ hp and ft/lb ratings from?

>>15687012
>N54
If you like fuel pumps blowing up just from looking at the engine the wrong way. N55 is pretty fucking god-tier though.

>>15677602
Completely inferior to the K20A1

>>15687282
We are talking engines here.. but the fuel pumps are covered by warranty after a lawsuit. Most people use upgraded pumps anyways that these HP levels

>>15678183
goddamn

File: 1475327136428.jpg (45KB, 653x480px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 653x480px

I'll just be over here....

>>15680082
neck yourself

>>15690240
>v6

ITT internet kids pretend they're engineers