Give me ONE good reason you need more than 4 cylinders amerifats.

It's not about what you need, it's about what you can have. Why settle for 4 when you can have 8?

I'll bite.
Give me ONE 4cyl with a 0-60 of under 4 seconds from the factory.

>>15656250
Why do you need 4? You can already exceed the speed limit in a legal car with 3 cylinders

>>15656263
>can't even wait 4.1 seconds to get to 60mph from a dead stop

Fucking americans, man.

>need

europoors favorite sayingg

>>15656250
TORQUE DIP
O
R
Q
U
E

D
I
P

>>15656264

Because it feels bad when your accelerating hard and fucking Linda in her 300hp minivan/crossover is up your ass.

>>15656263
FWD AMG Mercedes does it in 4.1. Can't think of anything faster than that out of the factory that isn't a track day car.

So you are correct, 4 cyl a shit

>>15656269
this.

america's a country of excess, we've been that way since the industrial revolution.

don't get mad that europe doesn't have the space for excess, we're a big, rich country, we're allowed to do this by pure space and money alone.

i mean, name any country that has both lots of space and money.

>need

You don't need. In fact, you probably only need 3.

The reason I have have 8 cylinders is because that's what a *wanted*, and I get what I want in America, unlike you yuropoors who don't know what freedom is like.

>>15656283
The AMG45 CLA is actually AWD, so that's even more embarrassing.

>>15656250
>>15656278
>torque dip

>>15656263
Ariel Atom

>>15656341
kit car
i
t

c
a
r

>>15656258
>>15656269
>>15656298
>>15656301

These.
>>15656263
Technically the FFR 818 does but it's a kit car.

>>15656298
Canada, Australia

>>15656250
It's not called the "Bill of Needs".

File: zx10r.jpg (209KB, 1200x798px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 1200x798px

you're right, 4 is more than enough

>>15656352
>waaaa that doesn't count because I don't want you to be right
You said factory, and they are factory

>>15656357
both are nations that enjoy V8s or ridiculous things like road trains.

>>15656263
Why dooes anyone need a car that can go 0-60 under 4 seconds anon?

>>15656377
What the fuck is a road train? A semi with multiple trailers?

>>15656382
yes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_train

File: 4L_juAUAt5M.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>15656377
6.2Liter supercharged, cunt

>>15656308
>>15656283
>>15656263
>>15656352

Alfa Romeo 4C does it in 4.2s
Evo FQ400 does it in 3.8s

>>15656376
no, they wouldn't be allowed in america if they were not kit cars because they are fucking F1 cars on the road.

it would be like saying the hayabusa is only 2 cylinders so logically you'll never need more than 2 cylinders on a car.

>>15656380

Why does anyone need a fast computer?
Why does anyone need a nice house?
Why does anybody need fancy food when you can live off Soylent and water?

Why don't we all just live like monks while were at it?

>>15656401
the golfs have you surrounded, run

>>15656250
>manufacturer benefits from producing and selling what consumer desires
>consumer benefits from buying and consuming what manufacturer produces

>europoors don't understand this

that's all capitalism is. If both parties didn't benefit, then the trade wouldn't happen (absent govenrment intervention). It's why America is so rich

>>15656418
Americans, not America.
a poor nation filled with rich people.

>>15656413
>I have no reasonable arguments

File: 99 pontiac.png (1MB, 1388x539px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1388x539px

>need

>19/24 us mpg
>0-60mph under 5 seconds
>305 hp 345 lb-ft stock
>0.91+ g skidpad on good tires
>11.9" brake rotors

>cost less than a nissan versa

File: turbo ta.jpg (136KB, 1000x666px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1000x666px

>>15656450
also
>removable t-top roof

do europoors even have t tops

kek

>>15656263
My single cylinder can do that

File: 1453916824071.png (27KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 625x626px

>>15656250
>you don't NEED this

spoken like a true cuck.

because even with forged internals your brz will shit itself under boost past 500hp, if it even makes it that far.

Meanwhile lsx, rb26, 2jz all happily laugh at that kind of boost

>>15656250
>you don't need this
This is why yurocucks should not be allowed on this board. It's about what I fucking WANT, not what I fucking NEED, but that's a concept that's beyond the average yuropoor.

>>15656441
Auto companies need it because I want it.

>>15656250
Give me one reason you NEED a car. Ohh whats that, you cant? Of course not, because other than food, water and shelter, you dont need anything.

>>15656250
something's gotta power your bus

>>15656752
many full sized buses uses diesel inline 4 engines, under forced induction of course.

>>15656371
This guy gets it.

Didn't a V4 win lemans?

>>15656441
To be reasonable is to deny your humanity

We are a species of "because.". The reasons arise in hindsight.

>well, actually, building a bigger tent than the chief one camp over might have had some advantages
>for one, everyone else in the camp went a size up since it would still be smaller than yours, chief
>for two, we can fit more people and stuff in fewer tents. great idea, chief!
>i just wanted the biggest tent. fuck the other tribe. if they start making bigger tents, we burn them to the ground.

When people buy faster cars, eventually everyone has faster cars as yesterday's premium becomes today's status quo, and the flow of traffic improves because most cars can get up to speed faster, zipper merge more efficiently, and so on

File: volvo.jpg (98KB, 799x499px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 799x499px

>>15656250

Same fag FRS 16 year old gay lover.

Aren't you too young to be browsing this site?

Suck my ass fuckboi

>>15656851
>eventually everyone has faster cars as yesterday's premium becomes today's status quo
where's my quad rotor Japan-muscle car?

>>15656870
Killed by regulations and bean counters.

>>15656870
Engineering is hard and takes a while

Being fast while conforming to useless emissions and safety regs is even harder

>meanwhile, a ship burning literal sludge is producing more smog than an entire city of cat-free muscle cars

File: 122-1206-05-o+cylinders-carbs+.jpg (90KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 600x450px

>>15656371
Get a load of this pleb

>>15656263
How exactly does an engine go 60?

>>15656263
Any motorcycle that does 0-60 in under 4 seconds.

File: image.jpg (71KB, 824x457px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 824x457px

>>15656263
>>15656402
The answer was right here, you faggot:
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution FQ400
0-60mph in 3.8s

File: 1440101281701.jpg (42KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 640x360px

>>15656250
>need
Irrelevant. Why do Eurofriends let themselves be pushed about by ecoturds who consider 2.0l to be "high displacement"? Even more confusing is that European manufacturers are the ones hand-building monstrous aspirated V12 and W engines, but get stuck with 1.3l and 3cyl diesel boxes.

>>15656263
>from the factory
Also irrelevant. The Evo and STi come with less power than a (CL)A45 AMG, but with the difference in pricing between them and the Merc dumped into tuning the two will eat it alive.

>>15657612
To be fair the FQ model Evos aren't stock. Mitsu just extended the warranty to cover whatever Rampage did to them.

>>15657816
>Even more confusing is that European manufacturers are the ones hand-building monstrous aspirated V12 and W engines, but get stuck with 1.3l and 3cyl diesel boxes.
Because socialism. Wants are irrelevant, there's no reason to own anything more than a 1l shitbox that will get you from A to B. Want something more powerful, less economical and therefore BAD AND EVIL? Have fun paying out the fucking ass.

>>15656402
>>15657612
>FQ400
NOT STOCK
O
T

S
T
O
C
K

>>15657816
>>15658013
What difference does it make whether its stock or not. Mitsubishi honoured their warranty, which means any competent manufacturer could replicate it. In fact, it will become more and more common as engines continue to decrease in size. This literally proves that yes 4 cylinder cars can and will do sub-4s 0-60 times. Doesn't make them better, but they are still capable.

Towing a 53 foot trailer with a full payload is the first situation that comes to mind where 4 cylinders just probably won't do, no matter how many turbos you hook up to it.

>>15656250
Soft Cunt.

>>15656250

>sound
>tourque

2 already. get rekt fag.

>>15656250
You don't; I have 2 cylinders and do 0-60mph in 2.8 seconds.

>>15657816
What anime is that picture from?

>>15656263
hayabusa

I tow.

Checkmate cuck.

>>15656263
Literally any modern 4cyl motorcycle

>>15656264
>4 stroke
>3 cylinders
Thats why

>>15656263
V65 sabre

>>15658905
only a boxer fires one at a time
flat four and inline four are less staggered

File: 1442457808689.gif (256KB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 400x225px

>>15658778
Boku no Pico.

that's right, a real man only drives cars with at least 8 cylinders

and if you worry about your payments and fuel costs you're clearly a pussy and a cuck! who needs savings when you got a 500 hp beast?

yeah maybe these speed limits and traffic jams don't let express your manliness but one day you will finally attend a track day!

>>15656250
Because an i6 is smoother and has more torque.

File: edited.jpg (1014KB, 1847x1079px) Image search: [Google]

1014KB, 1847x1079px

>need

yeah, i dont need a V8 car. but i can, so fuck you

>>15656649

>Blaming Eurofriends for Nipcuck threads
I'm a Eurofriend and I support big fun hoonable engines.
I like my e36 6cyl, if I could afford it I'd stuff an s62 in it.

>>15657048
>>15656465
>>15658791
>>15658796
How will I take my wife and 2.5 children places? You faggots know OP/I was talking about cars.


>>15658238
I know that, but one fact I also know is that there aren't any stock production cars with a sub 4 second 0-60 time, this is to frustrate yurofags, which is working well. I own an NA 4cyl car myself.

>>15656405
>they are fucking F1 cars on the road
are you fucking kidding me? it's a civic engine mounted on some tubes and you think it's a F1 car lol

File: 1466286335260.jpg (48KB, 355x412px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 355x412px

>>15656301
Well I want a Nissan Skyline.

Oops, banned cause domestics cant compete.

because soon there wont be any

its up to me to save what i can before its too late

>>15659639
>this guy hasnt seen a road registered f1 car

File: 2017-Porsche-718-Boxster-S-03-626x382.jpg (30KB, 626x382px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 626x382px

>>15656263
718 Boxster S (SportChrono/PDK)
Praga R1R
Zenos E10 R
Caterham Seven CSR

>>15659701
>Boxster, aka only "real" car of the list: 4.5 seconds, meanwhile a Boxster S without the flat 4 does it in 4.0 seconds, BTFO

>>15659725
>Boxster S without the flat 4
But that's wrong.
>the rest don't count because I said so
assmad

>>15659725
What the fuck are you on about you busriding cocksucker?

>>15659768
boxster s is a 2.5 4cyl now and it's faster than the old 6cyl :^)

>>15656250
Towing

>>15659786
No shit it's going to be faster. Porsche is the last of the uncucked German automakers and they wouldn't dare disappoint with something slower than its predecessor.

>>15659768
>>15659735
you people seem upset? maybe a drive in my 5.0 V10 will cheer you up?

File: Porsche-919-Hybrids_Le-Mans_20151.jpg (574KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

574KB, 1200x800px

>>15656250
You don't.

>>15659799
>my 5.0 V10
A used diesel Phaeton?

>313 PS (230 kW; 309 bhp)@3750, 750 N·m (553 lbf·ft)@2000
>750 N·m

Enough torque to give Mjet autism.

>>15659886
He already has autism, maybe it'll cure it

File: 20 V4 mode Eco.jpg (21KB, 502x335px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 502x335px

My 'vette has 4 cylinders

>>15656269
Yup, they don't need so they give all the money, women and children to refugees

>>15659886
Probably an e60 m5 since they cost like 19K now

>>15659999
The get of truth, yup.

I don't need more than 4 cylinders when there's a turbo on it, but an N/A 4 cylinder engine is for economy cars only. Notable exception being the S2000.

>>15656250

Because my V8 will probably last a lot longer with much, much less mechanical issues due to lower RPMs over its life span. Four cylinders are too high strung and can't produce as much power as a V8 without force induction and beefed up bottom ends.

Meanwhile, in the wonderful land of "cost" I can take the same money to get 400hp out of a coke bottle and make my behemoth of an engine double its power.

Also, trucks.

>Americans constantly complain how it's not fair that the rest of the world isn't starving
>then brag about how great their country is to try to make others jealous
And you wonder why you're despised....

>>15656268
Lamborghini: foreign
Ferrari: foreign
Bugatti: foreign

You yell at Americans for 6 and 8 cylinders but not foreign manufacturer for 10, 12, and 16 cylinder vehicles? Wtf is with this hypocrisy and misplaced hatred for Americans?

File: 22569000808_c965f353e1_o.jpg (148KB, 560x392px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 560x392px

>>15660076

File: 2016_05_31_IMG_3424.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

Why settle for 4 when you can have 8?
Why settle for 8 when you can have 12?

>>15656250
With 4 cylinders there isn't always a power stroke occurring like with 5 cylinders and up. Also you picked a horrid example of a 4 cylinder engine. The torque dip in boxer engines rivals the depth of the marina trench or your mother's vagina.

>>15660114
i'm just a little bit jelly

File: image.jpg (29KB, 400x264px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 400x264px

>>15658717
Yup, you need 6

>>15656250
listen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHSy-j2Wkq0