What's the closest thing to a RWD CRX that's less

>>15566202
Ecoboost Focus

Boxster

>>15566202
Nissan Z

>>15566202
Twingo

>>15566242
i would if i could

File: mercedes-benz_c-klasse_-sport-coupe-_3010[1].jpg (43KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1600x1200px

>>15566202
These are barely inside 10 years.

>>15566202
Fuck off and die

>RWD CRX
So.... not a CRX?
>less than 10 years old
So.... not a CRX?
You don't want a CRX?

Miata, prove me wrong

>light
>cheap
>underpowered
>fun
>all old affordable ones are beat to shit by teens
>you look like a fag driving it

>>15566202
>less than 10 years old

Cars like the CRX don't exist in this millennium, m8

>>15566285
CRX are FWD, m8

>>15566328
that's what he implied, m8

>>15566328
Yeah, so not a CRX.
This entire post is stupid. Guys I want a car like a a 67 V8 Mustang except made in the last 10 years, FWD, and an I4.

>>15566289
>convertible
>not practical

>>15566202
>Less than 10 years old
>Confirmed Filthy Casual

>>15566337
He's just another retarded kid that thinks if you change a FWD car to RWD it'll act exactly the same but also paradoxically be "better"

>>15566337
I always wanted a RWD version of the CRX, though. I'm pretty specific.

>>15566202
Looks kind of like an ae86, so let's make a logical leap and say the toyobaru twins

>>15566363
Just invest in a nice aftermarket hardtop.

>>15566377
You're fucking stupid!

>>15566390
Not the same thing, and it's still a two seater with only a trunk

>>15566393
I like the configuration, looks, and size of the CRX, though I'd prefer RWD. How is that stupid?

File: spyder.jpg (733KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

733KB, 1600x1200px

>>15566202
this, more than 10 years old now though

>>15566411
>nothing like a CRX
looks like Op's dream car

>>15566408
You're fucking stupid!

>>15566414
>light as a feather
>2 seater
>low power
>great handling

Give it a hardtop and you have a midship CRX

File: Z33.jpg (330KB, 1800x1205px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 1800x1205px

>>15566202
350Z

>>15566226
>>15566428
these are the correct answers

>>15566408

It's stupid because you want some magic car that doesn't exist.

>>15566424
So... nothing like a CRX?

>>15566436
how is that anything like a CRX besides hatchback? it weighs almost twice as much

>>15566439
No, I asked for the closest to it, not perfection.

Autism level is off the charts in this one.

>>15566449
because OP didn't fucking describe a crx at all?

>>15566424
The CRX was a four seater coupe with practical hatchback in a kammeback style

You suggested a two seater sports car convertible

Yeah man they're the same car.

>>15566462

OP keeps saying, "closest to", name something closer to a RWD CRX

>>15566469
but the CRX was reliable

>>15566462
You know how I know you're wrong...?

>>15566449
If you want light and rear wheel drive, go for the FR-S/BRZ or something from the 90's.

>>15566472
That's fucking dumb.

>>15566399

... Is that not what OP is asking for? The CRX is a 2 seater with a trunk...

>>15566337
Focus ST?

>>15566492
It's fucking dumb because it's a logical approach to the question?

>>15566462
Ok, not the same poster, but how about Pontiac Solstice GXP?

>hatchback
>2 seater
>RWD

>>15566414
the crx is a tiny econobox
this is a tiny econobox turned around

>>15566479
kys and fuck your meme

CRZ, although it's shit even with the supercharger.

>>15566523
It's fucking dumb.

>>15566449
I own a CRX and my mom owns a 350z. When she was in the hospital and I got to drive her car to classes and back, the 350 felt like my crx just with more horsepower, turning and everything feel the same

>>15566202

There is a dude near where I live that has a mint crx exactly and he doesn't want to sell it even tho he has already 3 other cars

>tfw

File: 13669662_10208126972304996_3557407208092065624_n.jpg (61KB, 960x638px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 960x638px

>>15570282

Why has no one said GT86?

>>15570229

Hahah the next generation of YouTube car reviewers.

>>15566408
>I like the configuration, looks, and size of the CRX
>though I'd prefer RWD

You're a fucking retarded kid with no idea what he's talking about.

>tfw want a CRX really badly
it's just a pretty car, fuck

European here. How difficult are CRX's from that period that are still in decent enough condition to buy anyway?

>>15570611
from what i've seen they're always rusted to fuck

>>15570148
Kswap senpai

>>15566411

This is the correct answer. The AW11 was a competitor to the CRX. So the modern MR2 would be the most similar to a newer RWD CRX. If you needed a FR car I guess it would be gt86. The 350z is too heavy.

>>15566226
whats the closest thing to a 1800 pound tiny engined econobox?

surely its a 3400 lb 3.7l v6 sports car.

>>15566202
> What's the closest thing to a RWD CRX that's less than 10 years old?
> less than 10 years old?
frs/brz

just as fast if not slower

>>15566272
Shit interior they're the cheapest base models though.

How did honda manage to make such a good looking car?