>700+ HP TT V8 GT500 coming >post yfw gm still hasn't

>>15556189
I don't know if I'm more turned on by the car or the leather mask.

>>15556189
If I pulled that mask off, would it die?

File: Harvey_2.jpg (26KB, 316x482px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 316x482px

>>15556206

Link to article :

http://www.mustang6g.com/?p=9611

>>15556212
he didn't drive so good

>>15556189
>>post yfw Ford still hasn't even topped the LT4's torque

GT500's are peak number dyno queens

>>15556189
>Where were you when the ZL1 got BTFO
Watching the ZL1 be faster around the track even though it's heavier and less powerful.

>>15556231
>torque
Useless.

>>15556189
>always Shelby mustang
>Shelby
>Shelby
>Shelby
>Outsourcing
>Chevy Camaro
>Chevy
>Chevy
>Chevy
>no lingenfelter, no callaway, no Hennessy
>always compared to Chevy.
Ffs. Maybe it'll actually be able to get traction instead of roasting tires like every other gt500 we've seen for the last God knows how long.

>>15556230
why would someone shoot a large crowd, before running them over with a mustang?

File: 1430272140361.jpg (42KB, 541x498px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 541x498px

>>15556243
The Shelby GT500 and GT350 have nothing to do with Shelby besides the name. The cars are built by Ford's Performance division.

>>15556242
>he doesn't know how horsepower is calculated

File: 16111_2_1467850890.jpg (17KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x360px

Do you people just forget about the Super Snake?

>>15556243
>unironically being this retarded

File: 1448485552172.png (1MB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1366x768px

>>15556235
>camaro
>faster

File: image.jpg (16KB, 200x205px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 200x205px

>>15556268
Or the terlingua?
>>15556275
Pls prove anon is wrong and the only thing about a Shelby that is Shelby is the name
>>15556282
>comparing current gen mustang to previous gen ZL1
Jesus

>>15556212
It would be extremely painful

>>15556282
OP said GT500/ZL1 not GT350/Z28

Try to keep up anon

>>15556301
He's the one who claimed it was built by shelby, not me. The burden of proof is on him.

File: 1467653328914.png (269KB, 401x317px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 401x317px

>>15556301
>>15556315
>no! don't compare them!
Stay mad.

>>15556301
The old GT500 and the new GT350 were built by Ford though

>>15556189
>twin turbo V8
What will the EcoBus nocars move onto now that the V8 shits on the V6 again?

>>15556502
>implying the GT500 will beat the GT around a track

File: 1469149681274.png (563KB, 569x802px) Image search: [Google]

563KB, 569x802px

>>15556189
Bane?

>>15556189
would i be able to get the mask with the car?

File: 1346207573735.jpg (67KB, 426x341px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 426x341px

>>15556189
>TT V8

>>15556189
Not happening. It's a v6tt kek

>>15556282
Isnt this the one people were saying was a GT-R killer

As much as a TT V8 would be awesome, I find it hard to believe they'd put that in a mustang, and then have the flagship GT with a TT V6. I know the GT is a v6 mostly for racing purposes, but it still seems like an unlikely move

>>15560529
The GT will weigh well over a thousand pounds less easily. The Mustang would weigh around 3900 lbs. It won't endanger the Ford GT at all.

>>15560661
I'm not implying the GT500 would approach the GT's performance, I'm just saying from a brand image perspective it would seem weird for them to put a TT V8 in the mustang when that's the engine everyone would have rather had in their "ultimate performance" car. And especially if the mustang was making over 700hp while the GT is supposed to be somewhere around 600. Again, not that the stang would be faster, but having their flagship being less powerful than a mustang would seem odd

>>15560713
Not really, that's subjective