Im coming to the interweb experts for advice on the 2011 Ford

>>15485032
I'd get a CTS-V if those are your requirements.

>>15485032
>i will be recruiting a team in norcal for our growing solar company

>i will be recruiting a team in norcal for our growing pyramid scheme

ftfy

>>15485050
this

>>15485047
>CTS-V
details? im not a fan of cadi's they seem tacky. why would you recomend this?

>>15485065
It's a 4 door (or a wagon) Corvette. It's American, more comfy than the Mustang, commands more respect, and can take more clients in a single trip.

File: 713519cf5aa654455b5eba78dcecdb19.jpg (16KB, 236x354px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 236x354px

>>15485032
>thinks a mustang is flashy
>thinks caddy is tacky
Wew. Fucking. Lad.

People in your position don't drive boy racer cars. Look at real estate agents. It's usually luxury sedans.

>>15485032
Anon is right, CTS-V is way faster, comfy, and can seat more people easily.

You could also be a tool and buy an Aston Martin DB7 for 20k with a v6. It wouldn't be as fast, but you could pretend you are rich to everyone who is not into automobiles

>>15485087
dont like stangs.. but a cobra is not a stang

>>15485090
Yes. An Audi A8 would be a good choice...

File: pridea.jpg (18KB, 300x260px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 300x260px

>>15485107
Its a "mustang" cobra right?

>>15485098
>Anon is right, CTS-V is way faster, comfy, and can seat more people easily.

i like all of those things. what kind of price tag am i looking at?

>>15485184
2011-2014 wagons are between $40,000-$50,000

Not sure about Sedans.

>>15485032

Do not listen to these guys.

>>15485047
>>15485098

Get a 2013 GT500 with higher mileage. It's faster than a CTS-V, and it's not a GM, big plus there.

Most defiantly that car just screams I am one edgy successful son of a bitch who slays pussy 10/10 would work with

>>15485032
Save up a little and go for a 2013 one, it's like going from a 2010gt/v6 to a 2011gt/v6.

>>15487524
Plus the CTS-V looks like an old mans car.
Go Corvette Z06 or bust, the CTS-V is inferior and costs more.

> represents a growing solar energy company

> wants to impress potential hires by driving around a supercharged V8

> literally believes that is how you define success to THE CLEAN ENERGY INDUSTRY

OP *please* get a GT500 so everyone you interview knows your company is trash and you're full of shit. Is everyone in California this retarded?

>>15485032
Assuming this actually might not be a bait thread, think about this for a second. You're selling clean energy. Why the fuck do you think anyone would take you seriously if you showed up in a vehicle that ensures you're beholden to the likes of Chevron? If you want to impress anyone interested in solar, at the very least be looking at a Tesla, for fucks sake.

>>15488809
This anon is spot on.