What's the most fun car money can buy under 20K? A random

>>15355114
mustang gt. you can easily find one before 2011 with under 60k miles for around 16k

if youre lucky you can find one 2011+ (with the new 5.0 engines) for under 20k but usually theyre around 22k

File: MG_4103.jpg (448KB, 950x633px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 950x633px

>>15355114

Lancer Evo 7-9. good platform. reliable (i know, its weird). makes power easy, modding is not that expensive. Back to back world time attack champs.

File: 2013-Ford-Taurus-SHO-rear-three-quarter.jpg (635KB, 1500x938px) Image search: [Google]

635KB, 1500x938px

>>15355114
An EcoBoost Tarus.

>>15355114
He's correct about Porsches, you just need to do research before you buy. For example, the early 00's Boxsters. You think it would be good to buy a garage queen with low miles, but those are actually still at risk of IMS failure. Higher mileage means they don't have the IMS issues.

>>15355368
Stop the shitposting with that fucking pleb tier fwd taurus. I would rather have a crown vic with blood on the backseats from the last black guy who was there.

>>15355401
The EcoBoost tarus is better than the Crown Vic.

>>15355401
It's not fwd tho

>>15355410
Nigga its fwd. If your paying that much for a turbo 2.0 just get a new camaro or a cadi ats.

File: 205626.jpg (246KB, 1078x1321px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 1078x1321px

>>15355417
It's AWD. Looking at performance aspects the Tarus is objectively better in every way.

>>15355412
Ah sorry, awd with a front wheel bias?

>>15355417
>cadi
>camaro
I want niggers to leave /o/. Only Alphonse is allowed to stay.

>>15355431
Alright maybe not a crown vic but id def take a shitbox camaro over one.

File: 2013-Ford-Taurus-SHO-rear-three-quarter-in-motion.jpg (405KB, 1500x938px) Image search: [Google]

405KB, 1500x938px

>>15355456
The Tarus is faster than the camaro 4 cylinder and so is the EcoBoost Mustang. Why would you buy something from GM?

>>15355368

>Tarus

learn to spell it right if you're going to shill, dumbfuck.

>>15355469
WTF definitely not. That ecoboost got a 6.9s 0-60. I like the stang though. That car is just a an econobox and everyone knows the japs make the best econoboxes.

>>15355493
>that ecoboost got 6.9s 0-60
No, it only takes 5.2 seconds. It's faster than a camaro 4 cylinder.