/o/ help me decide, Audi A5, BMW 4 series, or Lexus RC? This

>>15343437
Oh and pic related, it's what I'm leaning towards right now, if only because I prefer the way it looks.

>>15343445

lexus. i think the look amazing plus toyota reliability

Lexus. Dont get eurocucked

>>15343455
Yeah, it's got dat far better cost of maintenance. I'm really feeling it.

>>15343437
Lexus RC

>>15343481
>>15343496
I'm really feeling you right now, /o/.

>>15343437
>pigfat
>no torque

>>15343528
I know it's kind of sluggish, but I'm not buying it for its racing capabilities. Plus I quite like the bulky look.

File: 2016.jpg (340KB, 1600x987px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 1600x987px

>>15343549

Why not pic related?

Big and comfortable.

>>15343549
>liking shitty modern car design
Kill yourself.

>>15343528
>pigfat

Yes it is...and?

Its V8 work like a normal Otto cycle and can switch to Atkinson cycle for MUH FUEL EFFICIENCY.

Also the car on the track runs very close to a Bmw M4, that means the chassis is well made despite of the heavy weight.

>no torque

It's the only V8 against V6, so your statement is invalid.

>>15343437
Mustang gt premium

>>15343562
I do like the Challenger, but it's got a much greater cost of ownership and not quite as good gas mileage. Plus I'm guessing the Challenger isn't going to have quite as much of a luxury interior.

>>15343565
That's pretty mean, bro.

If you like the RC at least swap out the front end so it doesn't look like complete ass.

>>15343593
Currently my only plan is to make the grill lining body color. Otherwise I don't mind its looks at all.

File: Ford_Mustang_2015_GT_int-dr.jpg (552KB, 925x693px) Image search: [Google]

552KB, 925x693px

>>15343584
get a mustang

the premium interior is really nice

>>15343647
I do like them too, but the cost of maintenance and gas mileage is just so much worse off! Besides, if I were to go muscle it'd be a Challenger.

File: rc-interior.jpg (103KB, 717x478px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 717x478px

>>15343437

get an RC bro, you know you want to

RC F

>>15343835
I agree senpai

>>15343662
What the fuck does "the cost of maintenance" mean? Do you realize you're comparing a BMW, Audi, and Lexus to a fucking Ford? Are you fucking retarded?

>>15343895
Um, yes, I do, which is a perfectly valid comparison considering I'm deciding what car to buy.

When I say "cost of maintenance" I mean how much it costs to keep the vehicle running properly, influenced by how often I have to get it repaired and what those parts cost.

I don't see how considering how much a vehicle costs to maintain could make one retarded, regardless of the considered brands. Maybe you should calm down a bit.

>>15343437

Neither of them .

Just get their respective 4dr versions.

>>15343437

depends what engine you get. i say the RC but get the 350 or the F, 200t is a joke, youll get smoked by base model economy cars

c class coupe?

File: bb844079155a57b619d786f554d5174f.jpg (7KB, 205x162px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 205x162px

>>15343835

>>15343835
I never understood the appeal of analog clocks on the car dash
>inb4 some faggot says it's classy and luxurious
fuck off they're in PT Cruisers

>>15343835
That looks nothing like on other cars. Brilliant. Also that matt silver theme they do in Lexus matches it 100%.

File: lexus-lc-500-f-2_800x0w.jpg (88KB, 800x451px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 800x451px

Wait for the LC F

File: Lexus_RC.png (3MB, 1820x1214px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1820x1214px

>>15343437
My vote: Lexus RC.
In metallic red, non-f sport trim

Your pic is not the RC but the RC-F though