ausfag here what do you guys think is the most desirable year

Amongst Boomers: either the '69 or '70

Amongst others: no one fucking cares

>>15318204
everybody likes the 69 because it looks the most aggressive

anything pre 71 is good everything after is redneck shit.
this is fact.

66 fastback

File: Screenshot - 06232016 - 08:01:40 AM.png (346KB, 754x332px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 754x332px

anything in this selection is GOAT mustang years. before and after have lousy american-style aesthetics that only appeal to young men.

>>15318204
the most recent one is pretty much the only one that doesn't look entirely shit desu senpai

>>15318536
This post is a joke, right?

File: mustang_II_74.jpg (159KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 1600x1200px

>>15318546

Maybe it's a generational thing. My dad had a Mustang II and it was the best car I've ever been near.

File: mustang_II_78_ghia.jpg (96KB, 700x459px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 700x459px

>>15318546

I almost bought one of these. I still can't believe I let my wife talk me out of it, but her son needed braces at the time.

File: mustang_II_77_original_trim.jpg (28KB, 720x406px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 720x406px

>>15318562

It's nearly impossible to find one in mint condition without mods. Here is a nice stang 2.

Call me a hick, but I unironically like Foxbodies or SN95s.

File: mustang_ii-lg.jpg (61KB, 980x551px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 980x551px

>>15318589

I like some of the custom deuces.

File: mustang-ii_orange_beauty.jpg (1MB, 3072x2048px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3072x2048px

>>15318592

what are those?

here's a nice non-standard color, if you are into that sort of thing.

File: 75-Ford-Mustang-II_Special-Ed-01-1024.jpg (58KB, 1024x758px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 1024x758px

this would be my favorite rear treatment of all the years so far. If you were behind this guy you just dropped back to a safe distance and watched it go.

File: shelby_gt350.jpg (456KB, 799x599px) Image search: [Google]

456KB, 799x599px

>>15318616

not sure if this is a genuine Shelby, but they're all priceless now.

File: mustang_II_74_beast.jpg (89KB, 640x388px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 640x388px

the 74s were nice, but that was a period when the emmision controls took away some of the performance, but a nice stang could still hold off any factory vette in terms of performance and head-turning ability.

the 74 deuces probably had the best handling with skid pad numbers in the high 6's if you opted for the ground effects package. I believe only a few thousand of those were produced so the value is high for a pristine one like this.

File: 1974-ford-mustang-ii_ground_effect_package.jpg (36KB, 640x426px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 640x426px

>>15318634

oops. pic is here.

File: mustang_II_nice_74.jpg (43KB, 639x402px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 639x402px

another nice orange one. Why did they stop using vivid colors like this. also the minimalist wheel treatment cannot be duplicated by any recent edition.

1979-2004.....complete shit

File: shelby_77_very_good_condition.jpg (73KB, 736x489px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 736x489px

another nice vintage shelby.

>>15318643
I have to agree. 74 to 77 was the glory years.

File: mustang_ad_76.jpg (2MB, 1650x1650px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1650x1650px

when ford released an ad like this the sales of vettes dropped for months. i'm surprised chevy did not file an unfair competition lawsuit.

File: mustang_76_very_nice.jpg (422KB, 1024x681px) Image search: [Google]

422KB, 1024x681px

I hope ford brings this back in a retro styled modern version, but I fear that they would ruin it.

Fox chassis's 79-98 cars are the best. POSs to be sure, but the most fun you have burning rubber and driving around town. The newer, the better.

You can fix all their shortcomings relatively cheaply. And make them as fast as you want/can afford.

File: mustang_II_76_custom_paing.jpg (2MB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x1360px

the sleek lines of the 76 stang lend themselves well to custom paint in the hands of a talented artist.

File: mustang_76_ghia_nice_color.jpg (116KB, 1000x665px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1000x665px

>>15318663
>Fox chassis's 79-98 cars are the best.

they are okay but 74-77 was the best era for performance + styling, but as I commented above, it's probably a generational debate that will never be resolved since the older ones are too valuable to risk on a track.

File: ford_mustang-II_hatchback_75.jpg (105KB, 771x448px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 771x448px

another cool aspect of the 74-77s was the way the stylists paid homage to the Pintos and other affordable Fords of the era.

File: mustang_shelby_II_76.jpg (31KB, 697x484px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 697x484px

LOL is OP even still here?

picture is another well-preserved Shelby.

File: mustang_II_notch.jpg (404KB, 1024x681px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 1024x681px

Other than the Shelby's, my favorite deuce would be the notch coupe.

>>15318204
65

File: 65mustang.jpg (155KB, 1100x631px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 1100x631px

>>15318676
>OP ask for desirable mustang
>people posting mustang II and foxbodys


>>15318679
Like seriously, Do you have autism?


Here is a good mustang OP

File: blue_chevys.jpg (313KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 2048x1536px

>>15318682

that is a nice paint job but the early stangs were just Falcons with nicer wheels.

pic related is a couple of nice stangs.

>>15318682
foxbodies are desireable

File: boss429.jpg (437KB, 1394x838px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 1394x838px

>>15318692
Mustang II are 70s shitboxes


>74-77 was the best era for performance + styling
That's pretty laughable considering the top engine was 302 V8 putting out a whopping 140 horsepower


a boss 429 would a rape a mustang II.

>>15318204
pretty much any one before '71.

doing a front end alignment is a huge pain when you have to adjust the camber/caster on them though. they don't have as much of a frame as compared to other cars made in the same era too, so be prepared for body twisting if you start trying to race it.

>>15318682
OP here, he is right, I think the mustang 2 looks shit
sorry guys

File: Ford_Mustang_GT_coupe_--_07-30-2009.jpg (996KB, 1643x881px) Image search: [Google]

996KB, 1643x881px

5th gen, before they ruined it with facelift

such clean shape

Everyone has different opinions on looks, but

>no Terminator in OP pic

triggered