Do you know the rules of the road? In what order should

>>15296679
I'm driving the orange car and I got places to be. Fuck those other two drivers. I'm going.

File: 1465384858733.gif (854KB, 352x240px) Image search: [Google]

854KB, 352x240px

>>15296705
>[

>>15296679

BCA desu

B has no stop sign and thus goes first while C gets the way due to the flowing traffic rule

B C A. Easy.

>>15296734

You're very close to correct.

b, then whoever got there first.

They're all breaking the law for driving on the wrong side of the road

>>15296679
No one, these pricks are all on the wrong side of the street

>>15296755
Idiot.

BAC

C hasn't reached the intersection and stopped yet, so A turns first.

>>15296783
>>15296755

Hand in your licence, pls.

BAC. C isn't at the stop sign yet so A has the right of way.

>>15296783
If C is a prick and won't stop at the stop sign and A and C would crash, A would be in big trouble for not waiting for C to pass.

>>15296793
If C blows the stop sign, he's not just a prick he's at fault for not stopping and hitting another car that had the right of way. A literally did nothing wrong in that situation.

>>15296793
It's your fault that somebody blew through a stop sign when you had the right of way

File: 4b23b983dd13e9b4ba5c5179bee4fbbf.jpg (11KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 236x236px

>>15296679
The funny part is if they were in America, they could all go at the same time without a problem. EUROPE BTFO

>>15296779
He's right. Who ever got there first has the right of way. It's in the fucking drivers test.
>nb4 right of way means direction
Nope.

If they all get there at the same time guy with no one on his left goes first. If not first come first served

B, A & then C

>>15296679
b
c
a
>nz give way rules

>>15296679
B A C

Unless A and C got there at the same time then it's B C A

>>15296786
Are you being sarcastic? Or are you actually fucking retarded?

The fact that so many have gotten this wrong is shocking. B is moving, it has right of way as both A & C are either coming to a stop or are stopped.

C hasnt stopped yet, A has stopped therefore B continues, A leaves then C follows

>>15300261
both are on stop signs and in that case strait though traffic has right of way over right turning
unless you want to get into a game of chicken

B C A

How do you people even drive?

>>15300254
This is bait.

>>15296761
Came in to say this

>>15296679
BCA

C'mon, there are harder exercises you could've given us.

>>15300369
Both

>>15300288

Both clearly not at the stop sign. Note C is before the line. You blind or just trying to be painful?

CORRECTION >>15300393

C is not, A is, its very simple. If anybody ever drove at all or had a lesson would know its BAC

>>15296679
Well first they should all get on the correct side of the road then it's B, C, A.

File: britain.jpg (18KB, 330x303px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 330x303px

>>15300369
both but only if they pass each other first

>>15300393
I'm talking about practice not law
if you think it matters that c has not come to a full stop you care more about the law than your life

>>15300399
>A is stopped
>C has to stop in order for B to pass
>by the time B passed, A and C are at the stop sign
>C goes straight and has the right of way over A turning
it's like you want accidents to happen.

>>15300434 Holy shit, you are special. One thing you have left out son. INDICATORS.

How do you know which direction A or C are making? #Checkmate

File: trafficator.jpg (125KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1024x768px

>>15300499
easy just keep an eye out for trafficker arms

well it's flawed. The only definite thing we know is B has no stop sign and is coming off of a main road. From the picture we can't see who's been to the intersection first, but I'm going to assume it was A because he's fully up to the line. That means A completes his turn and C follows.

>>15300543
>well it's flawed
that's the point of such tests
so you can be rejected on pedantic and subjective grounds
either that or they "want to see your reasoning"

>>15300499
are you blind, retarded or just really bad at trolling?
the indicators are shown in the picture
B is indicating a right turn, A is as well.

>>15300543
at the time A can turn, both him and C will be stopped at the sign, therefore the regular right of way (straight before turn, right before left) applies.
damn for an auto board you sure are dumb

>>15296734
A is at the stop sign before C though...

B - A - C

b a c
b has no stop sign
a is stopped
c is approaching the stop sign

>>15296783
>>15296789
>>15298336
>>15300221
>>15300261
>>15300393 (maybe bait)
>>15300399 (maybe bait)
>>15300543
Do any of you even drive or do you just like to be edgy on /o/?
And if you drive I'd like to know where exactly you do that so I can know to never visit the place.
>>15300553
So it was teh jooz messing with your exam? Not your retardedness?

>>15296761
They are refusing to bow to the French military, unlike your cucked country.

>>15300663
GOD FUCKING....have you considered that maybe the reason it doesn't have signals on is that it might be going forward? Like in the direction of that arrow? And have you considered the fact that the 1 rule you should follow before any other is to keep safe? Meaning that A turning is going to take some time from a standstill and C might just plow into it? And that A would in that case be legally in the wrong?

>>15296679
BCA, B is on the main road and A should not turn across the path of a vehicle even if C is at a stop sign, in reality it would probably work out that C would be across the lane into which A is turning with plenty of room to spare so they could go almost simultaneously.

>>15300669
It's BAC. Just go read your 2 way stop drivers manual and accept it. If A is there first and already waiting the straight traffic waives right of way.

It's really a non issues anyway.. 2 way stops are only in low traffic areas where a situation like this wouldn't significantly interrupt flow of traffic and whether one car waived the other or vice versa would make little difference.

Whoever has the biggest balls goes first

>>15300676
c would be legally in the wrong for blowing the stop sign, dumdum

>>15300682
>what is right of way
Is /o/ really just 5 year olds?

>>15300685
He doesnt have right of way you sperg.
It's a 2 way stop. who ever gets the first has the right of way regardless of direction.

have you ever driven a car? serious question.

straight only has right of way if you've both been sitting there waiting or you both get there at the same time.

A and c depend. They both have to wait for b, b has no stop sign. B has the right of way. I guess since its bongoland its left of way? Anyhow. Assuming a and c arrived at the same time they yield. Person ironing yields to person going strait.

So BCA

>>15300707
Fucking mobile typing.

>Ironing.
turning

>>15300699
>hurr durr he's 3 feet away from the line so I can just do whatever, I gots the powah!!
GOD. You're worse than those self-absorbed idiots that think texting is a-ok at highway speeds.

>>15300685
>>what is right of way
A fallacy, there is priority but not right of way.

ITT: right hand rule faggots making other faggots rage by forgetting left hand rule exists in cucked wrong side of the road countries

>>15300757
>cucked wrong side of the road countries
The ones who owe everything to letting the French fight there battles for them?

File: 0000.png (347KB, 548x400px) Image search: [Google]

347KB, 548x400px

>>15300805
Which is it m8?

it's B, A, C
B because it has no stop sign, A first because it's approaching C right side so C has to let A pass

none of the above because no one drives on the fucking left side of the road

File: drf.jpg (168KB, 480x477px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 480x477px

>>15296679

Better solve it with a drift-battle.

>>15296679
B A C You scrubs how can you not know this.

>>15300971
Everyone not cucked to the French military drives on the left.

>>15300824
A lot more of the right than the left.

Have all the BAC morons in this thread been hit on the fucking head? Nobody fucking gives a shit that you reached the intersection a split second earlier, when you turn across an opppsing lane you have to wait for its traffic to pass. Period.

>>15301084
So Russia and both American continents have been cucked by the French military.

File: whogoesfirst.jpg (52KB, 480x477px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 480x477px

>>15296679
no one

>>15301133
are you kidding me? of course they have
lrn2history man

>>15301106
they are all autists who really shouldn't drive
obviously A and C will be stopped at the sign by the time any of them could pass due to B having right of way.
if both are stopped, regular right of way applies.

it's just autists loving to be "technically correct", and because they can't apply the picture to the real life situation because they can only comprehend what is given in the picture, not that the situation will be marginally different after giving B his right of way.

>>15296679
They should all get tickets for driving on the wrong side of the road.

>>15301183
Nice. Honestly fell for the bait.

>>15300673
>French military
What even

Of, if you are given the information that car C (the car that hasn't actually gotten to the stop sign yet) is a BMW
>car C guns it, ignoring the stop sign
>car B slams his brakes
>car A waits for B to finish the turn so he can go.

>>15298327
lel

CBA

>>15296705
This. The answer to OP's question is 'whichever car I'm driving'.

Maybe that junction needs a roundabout.

>>15296679
The guy with the biggest balls go first.

>>15300369
They should both floor it, no reason to stop when you're under enemy fire

File: road rules.jpg (203KB, 480x477px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 480x477px

Now for hard mode.

File: it_s_time_to_stop__by_bonzi_m8-d9rl6sf.png (289KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 800x600px

>>15301675

File: HSV-010-GT.jpg (88KB, 456x374px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 456x374px

>>15301675

>>15296679
B>C>A

A has to yield to C because he's on his right.

This thread is terrifying

It's fucking B A C

B has no stop sign, so done.
A is at the 2 way stop first, so he goes first from the stop
C is last because he came to a full stop last

End of discussion.

File: 1466444992945.jpg (65KB, 480x477px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 480x477px

>>15301675
stepping it up

>>15302220
>american driving knowledge

>>15296679
me first

>>15301022

Kek

>>15301675

Can't breathe

>>15296705
orange has the right of way as you are on a main road

>>15296786
AM I BEING DETAINED !!??

>>15300655
yeah have fun turning then getting hit by C and having to explain to the insurance "how u were first at the stop light!!!"

>>15296679
B,C,A

B should go. But beyond that, no. not my country, I dunno how it fuckin' works.

>>15296679

B A C is the order

B has the right of way
A goes next cause he was already at the stop sign
C goes last.

>>15304026
How do you know B has the right of way? He might have arrived last or second.

>>15304036
because there is no stop sign for B. if B also had to stop then there would be a "STOP ALL WAY" sign for all 3 drivers

>>15304026

Are you Asian? With this logic you'd drive like one.

>>15302220
This desu
Going by the letter of the law, A has right-of-way due to stopping first.
A good police report would find A free from any fault for going first.
Worst case scenario, insurance would split the damages 50-50 for comparative negligence.

>>15304093
are you retarded?

>>15304179

Whooeee, that law is insane! The order in Aus would be a simple BCA.

B has no indicated stoppage and no give-way line and is free to turn, though giving way to the right lane.
C must stop before the solid line, then progress through the intersection when both lanes are clear.
A must stop before the solid line, and is turning against two transverse lanes and a single lane of oncoming traffic, and must not enter the intersection until clear. If the intersection was controlled via lights, then A would be free to move forward into the lane occupied by B and turn when the lane occupied by C is clear.

Over here it doesn't matter who came to a stop first as there is far too much ambiguity.

>>15296679
B C A, rule of speed.

B goes first because it has no sign.
C goes second because the time he takes to get through the intersection is less than As and he doesn't have to calculate traffic gaps etc.
A goes last as it's going to be the slowest from start to finished and has the most obstacles to give way for.

IN THE REAL WORLD - B goes through and either C and A stare at each other for 30 seconds or both try to go and have a crash.

In the United States
>BAC
Anywhere else in the world
>BCA

At least, it would be BCA in Australia. That's how I follow it and it works well enough, no crashes yet.

>>15304474
Pretty much both ways , in SA at least you're not allowed to turn into the path of an oncoming vehicle so C has right of way at a stop sign, however if it's a give way sign, road is clear L/R and he is still approaching the give way, you're allowed to go.

>>15300369
IRL id nod and wave the guy through.

But I believe you just turn slighly sharper and both go?. Is this a trick uestion?

>>15302220
This. I can't believe there are people ITT advocating it's okay to blow a stop sign because you're already carrying speed therefore you have the right of way.

B first
Then C or A next depending on who got their first.

>>15304369
C goes before a you fucking cucks, they are both at stop signs and he has the right of way, unless a gets there way before him he can wait his stupid ass for 5 secs

>>15302220
C is so close to the fucking intersection that he may as well be stopped there.
Sure, if C were 50 meters away then A should go, but C is hardly a meter away from the line.

File: bernardblack18.jpg (47KB, 798x679px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 798x679px

>>15301632
>tfw just getting this 2 hours later

>>15301133
Yes, if you don't know that I guess either you live in a country with no education system or you are just here for summer.

>>15304474
This. I'm just going to assume everyone saying BCA in this thread does not live in the US, because in all my years of driving as a US citizen it has always been the case that first to stop is first to go. In the US, this situation would very clearly be BAC.

I'm not going to get into the argument of which one is better because I don't give enough of a shit, I'm just saying that's how it is.

>>15301401
If it was French military related don't you think the cars would be in reverse?

>>15301401
Go and read some history. You can read can't you?

>>15301188
It's not even technically correct unless you live in the United States of I WAS THERE FIRST. Everywhere else you wait for opposing traffic before turning across. If opposing traffic has to brake for you, you're doing it wrong.

File: 1447148444468.webm (2MB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 960x540px

You're all fags.

>>15305668
>Everywhere else you wait for opposing traffic before turning across. If opposing traffic has to brake for you, you're doing it wrong.

Exactly BAC is just dumb.

>>15306193
>Calls others fags
>Posts video of someone on the only form of transport that makes a Miata look hetrosexual.

>>15306308
>implying bikes don't make vagina's wet

Only thing a miata does is make you a fag.

>>15305668
if B wasn't there, A would have right of way before C though, as C would need to stop for the sign while A can already start rolling (if no traffic is on main road)
if C doesn't stop, he's blowing a stop sign and ignoring right of way rules
if C is stopped and A has begun rolling, A has right of way.

obviously that's not this situation, but it was how I'd say BAC autists argue in their head because they don't know that time passes while B takes their turn.

File: initiald ae86 fc.jpg (130KB, 1200x892px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1200x892px

>C hasn't stopped yet
>implying a second of difference would be noticeable IRL
they'd both end up stopped in front of each other and whoever is not going to turn should go first.

>>15303396
>"how you were first at the stop light"

First, it's a stop SIGN, not a stop light you fucking orphan.

Second, if you stop at a stop sign first, it's your turn. If you don't know this you need to go back to drivers ed.

Third, yes. If C hits me because they're so retarded that they don't know basic driving laws and cause a collision because of it, my insurance company won't have a problem putting the blame on them.

>>15296679
BCA

>>15306381
Won't happen like that, you will get boned for turning across the path of the other vehicle. Turns into he said she said, then they will look at the direction of travel and deem you at fault.

>>15301675
VRBCDA

>>15296679
Fuck, this is some good bait.

Congratulations, OP.

>>15306315
>implying a biker has any interest in vaginas.

>>15306399
ok, so from now on, even if I arrive at a stop sign first, I'll just wait for everyone else to go so I don't get boned by insurance


seriously though, kill yourself.

>>15306447
You are one dumb motherfucker.

>>15306435
Certainly more than the openly gay miata driver

>>15306315

That's not a bike nigger, thats a fucking scooter.

Take your TaoTao to a gayclub and drop dead, faggt.

File: benchracer.jpg (52KB, 600x480px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 600x480px

>>15306479
that's all you can come up with. I'll chalk this up as another internet argument won..

>>15306447
you mean life insurance ?

>>15306381
Their insurance won't have a problem putting the blame on you saying you took his right of away in case that happens and they will win.

>>15306447
Yes you are supposed to wait.

It probably varies region to region desu


Who ever got to the stop sign first has the right of way. If they got there at the same time the person going straight has the right away. B obviously has the right of way because they have no stop sign.

>>15310017
>right away
>person going straight goes first
Do you just make shit up and hope people believe it?

>>15310032
How does that not make sense?

If they arrive at the stop sign at the same time, the person going straight has the right away

>>15310040
Its right of way dumbass. And the person on the right has right of way. Go learn traffic laws before you attempt to drive.

>>15310058
>person on the right

You mean B? its been established that they already have the right of way

are you smoking crack?

>>15310058
oh and excuse me for making a fucking type o

>>15310071
No you dumb fuck. This has nothing to do with the OP image because the cars aren't approaching stop signs at the same time.

>>15310104
B doesn't have a stop sign.

>>15310097
>typo
Don't try to act like you know what the fuck you're talking about when you don't know the difference between right of way and right away.

>>15310108
What part of not the OP image do you not understand? Is reading this difficult for you?

>>15310114
That B has no stop sign. It's right fucking there dummy. LOOK

>>15310121
>explicitly say it's not the OP scenario
>hurrrrr there's no stop sign for B
Fuck off retard.

>>15310135
Do you know why there is no such=h thing as "left of way"? Because right of way means right, the right of way, not a fucking side or direction. It's his right.

>>15310148
You mean right away? Again, go read your traffic laws dumbass.

Man this is just one big b8 fest

>>15310159
>implying anyone here even has a license

>>15296679
Technically it should be BCA because B does not have a stop sign and is turning, C is through traffic, and A is turning. In the real world C will just wait for A to turn because he was there first.

>>15296679
BAC man

>>15306515
Ignorance is bliss so they say.

Sure seems like it.