https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qd FB_TGc9E What do you th

FWD will be always an inferior platform for performance and butthurt Honda owners will never accept this but somehow think benchracing a heavily modded Civic against a 20 year old car means FF is better

>>15289996
Drift events???

>>15290112
what about when a newer performance rwd is up against a 20 year old stock civic and is found lacking

this fuckign board

YEAH YEAH RWD

>>15290141
>FWD BTFO

File: beef.jpg (39KB, 425x756px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 425x756px

FWD is perfectly fine for normal cars imho.

It will always have its place in econoboxes.
It will always have its gems like the Type-R.

Performance cars will always be ideal as RWD or AWD just because of the physics of 4 wheeled vehicles. I can understand this. Guess what. Not that much of a difference under 300hp

I have a FWD DD that I need for highway commuting and I can still take it on back roads and have fun (mostly because based mazda handling). Is it better than a RWD/AWD sportscar? Nope. Does it do what I need it to do while remaining cheap yet fun to own? Absolutely.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phjw32BIHjo

Anyone who says otherwise is a sheep and can't form their own opinions or rides the bus.

Pic unrelated

>>15291127
I think otherwise. I think FWD can perform just as well. Stop it.

FWD is great for cost cutting in econoboxes. That's all it's ever been good for.

>>15291190
> I think
opinions aren't facts, faggot

rwd doesn't put the cornering and drive loads on th e same wheels.

FR is at a disadvantage in terms of traction in some scenarios, but MR has no disadvantages compared to FF.

FWD is great for a DD, and nothing else

>>15291261
Did...did you not finish reading my post before you typed a reply?

>>15291285
cancer

>effu effu