Daily reminder that GM literally has NEVER created a production

>>15063494
Damn no shame with the copy/paste these days

lol can't turn

File: 1448485552172.png (1MB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1366x768px

>>15063504

>>15063510
>pigfat vs pigfat

still slow

>>15063525
cue GT350R vs M4 meme laptimes

>>15063525

And both are faster than your car, in every way.

File: 55326949467637.jpg (177KB, 709x1131px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 709x1131px

>>15063525
This is the future you chose.

File: superduty.jpg (103KB, 1000x668px)

103KB, 1000x668px

They made a 480hp production engine in 1963 with pushrods and a carb, and it took Ford over 50 years to beat that with huge leaps in tech, I would say GM's effort was more impressive than this engine is today. The 1969 ZL1 is up there too. However Ford's cammer was definitely more powerful than this new engine is, which is also 50 years old and was available as a factory option.

>>15063538
>implying im dumb enough to spend 100k on a pigfat no turn mustang
lol 4chan
>>15063540
both are pigfat and slow

File: rekt.jpg (159KB, 877x939px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 877x939px

>>15063494
>>15063510
>>15063540
>>15063552
THIS IS NOW A SNEK THREAD

>>15063558
>D I S C O N T I N U E D
>I
>S
>C
>O
>N
>T
>I
>N
>U
>E
>D

File: 1450658628203.jpg (115KB, 509x501px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 509x501px

>>15063552
GM still hasn't made a production engine that is inside of a production car that's more powerful than the GT350's engine.
>>15063556
Still faster than the M2 or M4.
>>15063558
>moving goalposts
>canceled
toppest of keks

File: image.png (233KB, 505x651px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 505x651px

>>15063558
QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ

File: 1449880362594.jpg (155KB, 749x778px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 749x778px

>>15063585

>>15063558
>>15063585
DELETE THESE BEFORE ALPHONSE COMES BACK

>>15063589
>canceled car faster than new production car
kek nisan

>>15063589
>cancellec

File: BTFO.jpg (265KB, 1511x978px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 1511x978px

>>15063558

>>15063600
>slowr

File: 1455069648000.jpg (121KB, 948x717px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 948x717px

>gm fangirls literally gave up on refuting my point
>resort to the snek because the vette is shit
top kek

>>15063623
>literally no laptimes
that's not how this works

File: 1450649808803.gif (2MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x281px

>>15063645
>N-NO!!! IT'S NOT FAIR!!!!
top kek

File: 1459977676053.jpg (28KB, 600x350px)

28KB, 600x350px

>>15063645
>no laptimes

maybe people could laptime it if it were still made you know

>>15063623
that thing smells like bullshit

>ACR a whole 4 seconds to 100kph
>but 3.5s to 60mph, meaning the last 3kph take a whole 0.5s

File: 234897294.jpg (390KB, 879x1066px)

390KB, 879x1066px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4tiTCtQceA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROFhMsk2-9U

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYl-xfKt9FY

Not trying to get into the benchracing just posting vintage snek vids

>>15063494
So why does it put out power within the margin of error of the LS7?

I have only seen 1 dyno ever showing more WHP from a GT350 over the Z/28.. and it was 1-2hp. and a fuckpile less torque, btw.

>>15063781
>more power
>still slower

lolford

File: 1385335050753.jpg (140KB, 981x580px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 981x580px

>>15063803
see
>>15063510
and get btfo

>>15063809
>doesn't know the ls7 was in the c6z
>ten yr old gm product literally rapes new ford product

lolford

File: 1462315686587.gif (897KB, 800x430px) Image search: [Google]

897KB, 800x430px

>>15063850
>gm literally has NEVER crossed the finish of lemans line in first place
top kek

>>15063858
>inb4 muh class wins
doesn't count