ITT: Hondafags explain why this is considered a super even though

Musclefags plz explain why mussel cars have are considered so mussel when a cobalt ss/tc beats the shit out of them in everything?

the cobalt is a piece of shit that will turn off while driving at highway speeds, crashing and killing you in the process, it doesnt matter if its fast, it's a piece of shit and you are a cuck for thinking its worth the talk

>>14981310
LOL... how fast a car goes around Laguna is the only metric you use to compare them. Fuck off Sheldon Cooper

>>14981310

they are not fast. and they are not comfortable.

a total poser car to be honest.

and yes, I've driven one.

Because it had a super car price tag and production numbers, never mind it was slower than commuter sedans
> na v6
> supercar
Top kek

File: da964aebdbe75762407810cb51013d38.png (246KB, 1293x179px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 1293x179px

ITT Hondafags explain why this is a supercar when a E36 M3 was faster for half the price new and 1/4th of the price used

They were never considered super cars when they were sold.
>>14983100
>Because it had a super car price tag
No it didn't Not even adjusted for inflation. They made a lot of them too.

>>14981310
Because it came out before the Cobalt did, and you dont get to take back cars original titles.

>>14981310
the nsx is considered a supercar?
by who?

Just look at it ffs.

>>14984722

Retards who don't realize that the first gen was classed as a 'sports car' and that the second gen (what we're getting with the 2016 model) is classed as a 'super car'.

>>14984722
By reaching weebs.

>>14981340
>this same autist

>>14981310
Who gives a fuck, just like what you like and stop caring about irrelevant lap times.

>>14981310
>2jz swap
>600whp achieved
>supercar

Also
>Japanese speed restriction

File: 1450959552380[1].png (892KB, 465x1193px) Image search: [Google]

892KB, 465x1193px

>>14984768
stay mad the cobalt is a piece of shit

>>14984760
it's another "europoor is mad as fuck the NSZ was better than the ferraris of its day" post

go get cucked by ahmed

>>14984794
>2JZ swap

you have to be 18 to post here kid

File: 1450960271916[1].png (1MB, 487x1241px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 487x1241px

>>14984865

most overrated shit, plastic and bland

0 soul

>>14983084
>not comfortable
The fuck?
They are max comfy. Are you like 300lbs and couldn't fit in the seat?

>>14984865
>>14984875
Except it wasn't.
Anyway, don't you find ironic you get cucked into buying anything that isn't made in your own continent? :D

>>14985294
>proof it was
>n-no it's not true!!
kek, tripcuck on denial

> don't you find ironic you get cucked into buying anything that isn't made in your own continent? :D
nope, is cuckoldry the first thing you think of when talking aboput cars, you have issues

> a 260-hp car is faster than a 15 years-older sports car

WOW!

>>14985310
If you think a puny NSX is a match for a F40 you have serious mental issues.

>>14985310
>nope, is cuckoldry the first thing you think of when talking aboput cars, you have issues
Strange you were the first to mention it :^)

>>14985317
>fact that the NSX can match it with no issues
>n-nooo its not truee!!!
stay in denial, tripcuck

>Strange you were the first to mention it :^)
whats the problem is talking about cuckoldry making you feel insecure?

It's 1991. You can get a 3,010-lb, mid-engined sports car with a 270-horsepower 3.0-liter V6 for $60,000 (about $106k in 2016 dollars). Tell me that's not a good value.

>>14985338
Nurburgring times
>Ferrari F40
7:18.70

>Honda NSX-R NA2
7:56.73

Both from flying starts.
Can you please shut up now bby?

File: 1459150408509.jpg (121KB, 948x717px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 948x717px

>>14985358
>ferrari
>being able to finish a lap around the nurburgring without catching up flames

top kek
see>>14984865
the NSX lapped tsukuba faster than the f40

>>14985379
No one cares about your shitty tsukaba meme track.

>>14985355
Actually, plenty of people paid $60k in 2014 for a mid-engined sports car with a 2.7-liter 6-cylinder making 275 hp. Considering 13 years of technological advancements, the old NSX doesn't sound too bad at all.

>>14985385
>this assmad

File: 2015_porsche_cayman-pic-180955666105315991-1600x1200.jpg (309KB, 1600x864px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 1600x864px

>>14985399
Forgot the image. Also, checked.

>>14985379
Your bait is almost as a stale as your mommy's cunt.
And by the way, the F40 does Tsukuba in 1:03.95, while the NSX-R does it in 1:05.41.

I'm sure your little pink butthole must be absolutely burning from all that Golf Clubsport destroying the Honda flying saucer stuff, but there's no need to go full retard about a worthless track who nobody uses as a complete benchmark, apart from some japs who don't have access to anything better :)

>>14985399
>13 years
M8

File: ixjRb2y.gif (543KB, 500x436px) Image search: [Google]

543KB, 500x436px

>>14985410
>NSX does it in 1:05
nope
see >>14984865
1:03, faster than the f40

stay analmad

>civic
pic related

>>14985410
Also, just because you love jap shows so much...

Best Motoring oval

>F40
1:29.21

>NSX-R NA2 (a 15 year newer car)
1:41.57

kek

>>14985430
>the car literally needs draft in order to do a faster lap
Suffice to say, it's not a verified time. And even then, it doesn't hold a candle to the F40 in a real track where it gets btfo by almost a minute.

>mfw my Punto has more torks than a NSX
literally dying here

File: 1459394696464.jpg (23KB, 240x251px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 240x251px

>>14985450
>oval
tip top kek

>draft
lolwat

>F40 in a real track
a ferrari can't finish a lap around the nurburgring without catching up in flames
just see
http://fastestlaps.com/tests/sgizlei75shh
>This laptime is a calculated estimate - not a test result.
>Real test results may differ!

KEK! literally can't lap the nurburgring

probably caught up flames after a minute

>mfw you drive a shitbox punto yuropoor shitbox
KEK! literally dying here

I don't consider it a super car, but I've been planning an nsx build, 400hp NA, wider tires, kW v3, and weight reduction. Is there a reason why I should think otherwise?

File: 1460529394797.jpg (97KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1000x1000px

>>14985477
Sure it was because it caught fire, kek.
After all having twice the power and still managing to be lighter than a NSX wouldn't make it faster at all.


>>mfw you drive a shitbox punto yuropoor shitbox
>mfw you drive a torqueless ricebox
How does it feel downshifting to 1st everytime you want to pass a bicycle?

>>14981310
because supercar depends as much on price as it does on performance

>>14985450
Nevermind the shitposter the F40 and nsx isn't really in the same class

The F40 went for nearly $400k while the nsx type r went for $80k

To be fair to the original NSX, Japan up until recently had a 276hp restriction, and compared to a 63hp Kei car or something that half of them drive, it would feel like a rocket ship.

File: 1458936426013.png (39KB, 156x143px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 156x143px

>>14985502
see >>14985477
>This laptime is a calculated estimate - not a test result.
>Real test results may differ!

>mfw this europoor is bragging about a fucking laptime set in a fukcing videogame
>mfw the f40 NEVER EVER lapped the nurburgring because ferrari knew it would catch up in flames
>mfw the f40 is slower than the NSX-R first gen around tsukuba

KEK!
E
K
!

tripcuck on suicide watch

the c5z corvette makes more power and is lighter yet its also slower than the NSX-R, stay asshurt

>mfw you drive a torqueless ricebox
i drive a shebby v8 though

File: z06oopsie.jpg (64KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 600x450px

>>14985594
>i drive a shebby v8 though
Then you're not the one to go on about cars catching flames.

File: 1460046936128.jpg (62KB, 479x444px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 479x444px

>>14985622
jokes on you, i am a ford fanboy

remember the 4 victories at lemans back at the 60's bby

>>14985699
>remember the 4 victories at lemans back at the 60's bby
So?

>>14985717
FoMoCo>FCA

>>14985735
Ferrari has 9 wins, Alfa has 4 wins... Your point being?

File: 1461369555418.png (167KB, 378x304px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 378x304px

>>14985743
>"hurr durr we ferrari we da best at lemans"
>gets cucked by ford 4 times in a row
>"i dont want to play anymore ;_;"

KEK

can't make it up

>>14985399
>what is inflation
a base cayman is not worth100k, just as the NSX was always poor value

>>14984783
/thread

>>14985418
My bad, 23.

>>14985928
No one said a base Cayman was worth $100k. The NSX is not a bad value, either. If you "inflate" horsepower the way the dollar has inflated, it's not unreasonable to say a 270-hp MR 3000-lb sports car for $60k in 1991 was a good deal.

>>14985502
I'm sure I can put a top fuel engine in a civic somehow. More power, probably lighter
doesn't mean it will work

It's a supercar because Gordon Murray says so.

>>14985479
a genuine 400hp NA from 3.0 or 3.2 litres would mean horrific reliability and driveability.

>>14988184
Well I was thinking with a 3.5 stroker, and itbs

>>14988184
you are clueless

its always been considered a sports car. pretty sure it cost the same as an RX7 back in the day.

>>14989659
It actually cost twice as much

$70-90k.

FD RX-7 and E36 M3 was $35-40k when they were new

And the M3 was better than the NSX at least...