Why are most lowrider cars GM products? It's not as common

My guees would be nigs in Detroit before the auto industry collapse aspired to own tbe carss they worked on in factories, creating a racial status symbol

Corporate philosophy of style over substance.

>>14880934
Because THE lowrider car is a 64 Chevy Impala?

Also, American landyachts are big, look shiny, have plenty of room for the hydraulics, have no handling to ruin, and are so solidly built you can attach whatever to them without killing fuel economy because there isn't any to speak of anyway.
So what if the chassis gives way when it bounces? Just have Javier weld it up again. Who cares if that's 'unsafe', they had no safety to speak of anyway.

Otherwise, you know what you get when you lower a hatchback to ridiculous levels? Stance. That's what.

Also, you just don't see many Ford landyachts. It's always a Chevy or a Caddy.

TL;DR:
Because GM made cars that were big, shiny, and shitty enough to ruin without fucking up the car any worse.

File: L R M.jpg (209KB, 1080x797px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 1080x797px

>>14883050
>Otherwise, you know what you get when you lower a hatchback to ridiculous levels?

A euro lowrider.

my dad has a 66 buick skylark lowrider
just random thought

>>14884746

Skylarks are great. Shame your dad ruined it.

>>14884907
>Osgtp
>in love with black womyn
>doesn't want one of the two styles proven to attract them
Niqqa...

File: 1448336498311.jpg (216KB, 853x1280px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 853x1280px

>>14884930

Look, I may be a sucker for melanin monkeys, but I still have principles.

>>14884907
nigger lover

File: Cadillac_Fleetwood,_1975 (1).png (898KB, 1010x552px) Image search: [Google]

898KB, 1010x552px

Simple, GM has always looked hotter and more sleek than Ford and Chrysler.

B > Panther

G > Fox

Cadillac Fleetwood > Lincoln Continental