You have free choice of a stock version of these pictured cars,

>>14866395
Skyline and Supra would be the most fun, but I'd have to pick the NSX because it hauls in the most pussy.

RX7, because its my favorite car and I have a boner for rotaries in general.

>>14866395
NSX purely because i could sell it and then buy the other three.

Supra because the RX-7 would be too tough to maintain.

>>14866410
>Implying an NSX is worth as much as an R34
They sell for close to the price of a Supra. You could sell it and buy the Supra. That's about it.

>>14866395
NSX so I can sell it

>>14866431
ok maybe not the R34, but here in the UK NSX go for around £40k, r34 around 30k, supras around 10k, RX7 less then 10k.

So if you wanted to be fussy i could sell the NSX and get a R34 and a RX7 or two-three Supras and a RX7.

>>14866445
Over here in freedomville the market's way different.
An R34 GTT (GTRs aren't legal...yet) is around $50-60k
Supras and NSXs were going for about $40k, but they've come back down recently. They're still very closely priced, though.
And then an FD RX7 is about $10-15k

>>14866453
Yeah thing with the UK is japanese imports are a very common thing ever since the 90's us and the japs both drive on the left so all our cars are RHD so they always sold direct to our market so we have an abundance of jap cars.

So all our prices are pretty low, only NSX seems to be expensive since there is so few of them. I paid £4000 for my R33 GTST which i think if i remember correctly is only a fraction of what it's worth in USA.

I feel sorry for you lot really, but then again USDM cars over here are overpriced. only upside for you is our cars especially japs cars rust to shit here.

>>14866453
You can find a shitty FD for $15k but a decent one will run you $18k+

Where are you guys buying NSX's?

They are going for 100K here in the states

>>14866453
>An R34 GTT (GTRs aren't legal...yet)

What? I thought the import law applies to all cars less than 25 years old, whether it's a GTR or not

But if there's a way to legally get an R34 GTT in the states then I'm down

>>14866395
>take nsx
>wait 10 years
>sell and buy the other 3

>all of these kike faggots sperging out about money
How about picking the one you would enjoy DRIVING the most?

File: Toyota Supra RHD Interior.jpg (3MB, 2850x1729px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2850x1729px

Supra because it's my favorite out of the four.

>>14866492
it does

idk what he may have meant but the only R chassis car legal to come to the US aside from the 25+ year old cars are R33s built between 1/96 & 6/98

>>14866492
>>14866515
The only R chassis cars specifically banned from importation are the GTRs. They become exempt from this status at 25 years old, and can be imported.

Any other trim can be imported through the same process as any other car under 25 years old.

I know what I'm talking about. I've got a good friend in the importing business. Guy drives a beautiful R34 GTT. I also know a Vietnamese shithead down in TN who owns one or two.

>>14866511
fuck off takumi

>>14866395
NSX.

It's different and doesn't have a massive rice tax like the others.

File: image.jpg (66KB, 1136x243px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1136x243px

>>14866543
That's wrong and you don't know what you're talking about. If they were eligible for import they would be on the NHTSA eligibility list.

http://www.nhtsa.gov/cars/rules/import/elig092210.pdf

See how this says 'GTS & GTR'

The Vietnamese shithead has gray market import cars that are probably state titled (not federally legal) and will get crushed or exported if caught.

OP here, I can't choose. The supra is ruled out first, because I think it's ugly and it's definitely the worst handling and least corner-oriented car. For the rest:

>NSX
Muh handling
Muh quality
Muh MR
Muh wedge

>FD
Muh lightness
Muh skids
Muh timeless sports car design

>GTR
Muh power
Muh AWD
Muh grip
Muh blocky coupe

They're all instant classics and fast in their own right, each has the potential to be a complete monster with mods. I'd lean towards the GTR since I already own a lightweight RWD car, and having a fast AWD car would complement it.

>>14866431
Except its worth more than an R34?
>imlying stancefaggots know anything

>>14866395
Easy NSX > FD >>> Supra = GTR= pigfat disgusting

>>14866395
NSX, it's the whole package.

RX-7 because every car guy should own a Wankel once in their life.

>>14866515
you are correct, but it still has to be outfitted with some bullshit proprietary kit from the owner's of the patent that is REQUIRED for importation of an R33 GTT, GTS, or GTR which I think is an additional charge of 10-15k on top of the price of the vehicle from an importer or the one who holds the patent, its an outfit in baltimore but I can't remember the name, google nissan skyline import baltimore md

>>14867581
It's JK Technologies, and they are legally the only ones that can bring a R33 up to code. That includes additional safety bracing, and converting the car to an OBD-II system.

>>14867612
yeah, they have the patents on the design of what's required to pass, and since they are the only ones with it, they charge accordingly

>>14866395

Do I get to test drive them first because honestly I have no idea

>>14866594
>crushed
Who is so legitimately buttmad as to do such a thing?

File: 1459633925839.jpg (168KB, 1191x1200px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1191x1200px

>>14866395
>honda

>worst body type

>poopra

>Wankel

None

File: big-bird-skyline-628.jpg (50KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 800x450px

>>14867802
>Who is so legitimately buttmad as to do such a thing?
The US Governmemt? Don't follow the law, run the risk of paying the price

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4l7JCb3RDqQ

https://artofgears.com/2016/01/12/watch-this-r34-nissan-skyline-getting-crushed-by-the-wreckers/

Even the yellow R33 ("Big Bird") from the first FnF movie was crushed.
http://www.speedhunters.com/2012/05/the-skylines-crushed-pizza-boy/

>get Supra
>since it's lhd sell to some tard for 90k
>buy NSX
>buy GT-R
>fully sick mawds

>>14867806
>>worst body type

Now that's what I call a contrarian

File: Optimized-9_93cdsupra13.jpg (477KB, 665x900px) Image search: [Google]

477KB, 665x900px

>>14866749
>The supra is ruled out first, because I think it's ugly and it's definitely the worst handling and least corner-oriented car.

What an ill-informed moron.

>>14867840
Why crush it
these cars are going to become legal soon, why not make money out of it and put it on a impound lot till it becomes legal than auction its ass
At least you make some money back instead of paying tax dollars to transport the car and wreck it because it was illegal

>>14867934
>Why crush it
It's a show of force, a stupid one

>>14867932
>implying the Supra can corner anywhere near as well as an NSX or FD
>posts a magazine article to "prove" it with no details, no measurements and no lap times
Looks like you're the moron.

File: discarded.jpg (146KB, 971x817px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 971x817px

>>14867932
>Handling
>RX-7: 9
>Supra: 10

Pic related

editors opinion and not at all representative of the truth.

Supra is a good handling car for its weight but it doesn't have anything on an RX-7.

RX-7 is probably the worst car if you're just looking for a stock car, Supra is at least decently reliable and the RX-7 really needs a big tune.

>>14867932

So many of those categories are subjective as fuck. Why should anyone consider the information on this image as factual?

european ultimate god machine not some nippshit shitbox

>>14867855
It is. Only Paul Walker fags like that body type.

File: 1453288171513.png (180KB, 374x319px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 374x319px

>>14866395
NSX because pulp fiction

>>14867966
It wasn't posted to prove anything, just that the old tired "heavy, can't turn" meme isn't based in reality.

>>14867973
>one opinion is better than another opinion

But I mostly agree with your other points.

>>14868012
Who said anyone did?

>>14868100

Thanks for proving my point

>>14868111

>Who said anyone did?

Then why post this and call other people "ill-informed morons" as if the info on this picture were factual

>>14866395

NSX for mad pussy.

Skyline so I can be shot and car-jacked.

Supra for roll-racing.

Rx-7 for braps

File: honda_nsx-r_27.jpg (259KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 1280x960px

1992 NSX-R, so long as the R34 isn't a Z-Tune.

>NSX
least likely to mod, would have to keep it more or less stock

>R34
great car, but RHD makes it undesirable to me

>MK4
I respect the car, but I don't think I could pick it over the other 3

>FD
wankel life, probably the most maintenance but it's worth it

I'd pick the NSX or RX7. seem the most fun and unique without being a rice magnet or RHD inconvenience

>>14868150
The picture was just semi-related supplement. I just hate people repeating misconceptions without research.

But all people know are the two or three inaccurate bullet points everyone regurgitates.

File: 1375418940240.png (2MB, 1498x841px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1498x841px

>>14866395
Rx7

timeless care with timeless looks and a unique engine and a mint stock version?

yes please

theses things will only go up in value and the fact that their more of a weekend type of car will add to their value if the original engine has been maintained.

r34's and mk4 supras will always be around, given for a shit load of money but your average one will be beat to shit and riced.

nsx will be around as usual almost always clean and for a shit load of money


but the rx7 fd will be one of those rare breed of cars like a mint 69 or 72 charger, a 69 camaro

a big fuck you to emission laws and mpg's

Supra

> 2jz
> getrag v160

The bet engine with the best transmission on the best chassis

File: fdandfc.jpg (74KB, 960x743px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 960x743px

Brap life is best life.

File: 1459433055012.jpg (183KB, 1024x887px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 1024x887px

>>14868150

>>14866395
NSX

I hate rotary
I hate 4WD
Supra is meme car

nsx because it's R A R E

>>14868111
Nobody said "can't turn" you fucking retard, now pack the fuck up and go. If you think the Supra can out corner an NSX or FD you can shove a supra shaped dildo up your fanboy ass and walk.

>>14868522
>worst handling and least corner-oriented car
>nobody said "can't turn"

I pick nsx because it is way cooler than the other ones, beside gtr and supra niglacious niggling nigger

>>14867802

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzBFwFos-o0

'murrica

>>14868564
>still arguing that someone said the "Supra can't turn" in the presence of irrefutable fact that it's you're the first person in this thread to type "can't turn"
>still trying to weasel your way out of the FACT that the Supra is the worst handling and least corner-oriented car of the 4.

Find me one piece of objective information showing that stock for stock, the Supra is better in corners than an NSX, FD or R-34 GTR.

RX-7, but i would really like to own miata :D

>>14866395
The NSX-R '05.

Grew up with NSX's. Dad had three (not at the same time).

>Nostalgia
> MR
> Lightweight
> Bulletproof engine
> Dat quality
> Timeless design
> Wedge shape
> Will haul the most pussy
> Easy to daily drive
> Retains the most resale value (I saw a red '03 with 15k miles sell for $80K last year.
>Ayrton Senna
>Targa top

>>14868403

My post had nothing to do with any of that you fucking retard

File: tmp_9823-1458231034078-146764226.png (1MB, 900x1174px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 900x1174px

>mfw supra fanboys shitting up any thread that doesn't worship their "race from a roll" machine as usual
Go fap to FnF again, dumbass

File: muh dick.jpg (477KB, 1280x854px) Image search: [Google]

477KB, 1280x854px

>>14866395
FD, no question.

File: MotorTrend-Mar-93-4.jpg (463KB, 800x1157px) Image search: [Google]

463KB, 800x1157px

>>14868620
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/acura-nsx-first-drive-review

>The last NSX we tested (July 1999) was an Alex Zanardi limited-edition model, which scaled in much lighter (2970 pounds versus 3153) than the curb weight Acura lists for the 2002 model. It sprinted to 60 mph in 4.8 seconds, covered the quarter-mile in 13.2 at 106 mph, stopped from 70 mph in 164 feet, and pulled 0.93 g on the skidpad.

>>14868680
As usual? It's mostly people gangraping it any time it's mentioned because /o/ hates anything popular.

>>14868741
awww... you gonna cwy now supwa fanboy?
>implying popularity, not rabid fanboys over-rating the car to fuck isn't the problem
>implying supra is more popular than R34 GTR or NSX
kek

/o/ worships tons of popular cars. NSX, Pre R35 skylines, miatas, AE86, etc.

>>14868776
Just fighting memes with memes, friend.

>>14868717
I'm not seeing a comparison here. Just a skidpad test that doesn't control for tire choice.

>>14868717
ah, the old "skidpad numbers = handling and cornering" meme

>>14866395

Gotta go with the NSX. Its the coolest shit.

I'd pick the FD because I'm an RX-7 fanboy and I've wanted one since I was a wee lad

File: hqdefault.jpg (13KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 480x360px

>>14866395

Rx7 is objectively the fastest of the lot according to best motoring time attack results at tsukuba circuit

File: spiritr.jpg (402KB, 3600x2400px) Image search: [Google]

402KB, 3600x2400px

>>14866395
Can I have this sexy beast instead?

File: gayometer.jpg (21KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 320x320px

>>14869211
>he'd rather have an RX8 than an FD

>not choosing the car with the spirit of a zero fighter

>>14869231
Well yes. It's better looking, N/A and I've heard that the body is way stiffer.

>>14866395

Kind of a hard choice for me. I'm not huge on Imports, but the I really like the Supra and RX-7. If I couldn't sell them after taking ownership, I'd probably take the RX-7. I've always wanted to build one into a cruiser/track machine. Keeping the Supra would tempt me too much to make a FatF clone.

If I could sell them? Supra in a heartbeat. Sale of mint condition ones in Texas are ludicrous. It'd fund both my projects to completion.

>>14869231
Na rx8 can make same power as a series 6 without being an unreliable mess

File: what chris tucker.jpg (17KB, 414x344px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 414x344px

>>14869249
>Well yes. It's better looking
>mfw

>N/A
>he thinks NA wankel is better than turbo wankel

>>14866395
NSX
I've always loved that car, especially the first gen.

>>14869271
I don't like turbos. Deal with it

>>14869249
>the body is way stiffer
that's why people drop 13b turbo engine into them

File: why 1.png (3KB, 196x177px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 196x177px

>>14869280
>I don't like turbos
Explain yourself

Also NA wankel is crap-tier, they are honestly at their best when force-fed.

>>14869292
Na rotary is objectively best rotary unless you're a drag racing faggot. Fact.

>>14869292
N/A is simple, turbo is complicated. N/A is responsive, turbo is not. N/A is lighter and N/A is more reliable.

Turbo is only good for going fast in a straight line. And I could not care less about that.

>>14869300
Or if you're a stance faggot with no intention of ever going faster than a crawl

>>14866395
NSX for sure.

>>14869309
Being this autistic EVER

>>14869308
>turbo is complicated
THIS FUCKING GUY

Have you never touched a turbocharger in your life? Have you ever even owned a turbocharged car? How about turbocharged a car that was NA? I've done them all, multiple times.
>turbochargers are unreliable and complicated
is a meme.

File: images-1.png (50KB, 325x452px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 325x452px

>>14869360
Have you ever touched a 20 year old rx7s turbo system? Nope?

>>14869360
You can't say that turbo is less complicated than N/A. More shit that can go wrong, and the boost can kill the engine. High boost at low RPM is a big no-no.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crGZC4BSPdQ

>>14869383
I have, I own an FD and opted to keep (upgraded) sequentials. It's better that way.

>Laguna Seca
1:54.74 - 2004 Acura NSX
1:45.87 - 1994 Toyota Supra RZ

>Willow Springs
1:32.59 - 2004 Acura NSX
1:38.30 - 1993 Mazda RX-7
1:39.00 - 1993 Toyota Supra RZ

>Nelson Ledges Raceway
1:22.00 - 1996 Acura NSX-T 3.2
1:20.10 - 1993 Toyota Supra TT UK Spec

>Goodwood
1:33.57 - 1991 Honda NSX 3.0
1:31.80 - 1997 Honda NSX 3.2
1:34.95 - 1994 Toyota Supra RZ

>Streets of Willow (0.96 mile)
1:07.14 - 1991 Honda NSX 3.0
1:05.64 - 1993 Mazda RX-7
1:05.30 - 1993 Toyota Supra TT UK Spec

>Fuji Raceway
1:47.96 - 1997 Honda NSX Type S Zero
1:47.84 - 2002 Honda NSX-R
1:48.19 - 2001 Mazda RX-7 RZ
1:47.15 - 1999 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec (R34)
1:48.21 - 2001 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec II (R34)
1:51.37 - 1994 Toyota Supra RZ

>Sugo
1:40.94 - 1997 Honda NSX Type S Zero
1:39.44 - 2002 Honda NSX-R
1:42.49 - 1997 Mazda RX-7 RS
1:43.06 - 2001 Mazda RX-7 RZ
1:39.75 - 2001 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec II (R34)
1:43.06 - 1994 Toyota Supra RZ

>Twin Ring Motegi (Conf. 2)
2:20.75 - 1997 Honda NSX Type S Zero
2:23.58 - 1995 Nissan Skyline GT-R (R33)
2:23.71 - 1994 Toyota Supra RZ

>Tsukuba
1:04.95 - 2002 Honda NSX-R
1:08.96 - 1993 Mazda RX-7
1:06.07 - 1997 Mazda RX-7 RS
1:06.36 - 2001 Mazda RX-7 RZ
1:04.00 - 1999 Mazda RX-7 Series 8 Type RS
1:07.03 - Mazda RX-7 Type R BATHURST A Spec
1:08.34 - 1989 Nissan Skyline GT-R (R32)
1:05.00 - 1995 Nissan Skyline GT-R (R33)
1:06.00 - 1998 Nissan Skyline GT-R (R34)
1:07.45 - 1993 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec (R32)
1:08.59 - 1998 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec II (R33)
1:05.32 - 1999 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec (R34)
1:06.37 - 2001 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec II (R34)
1:06.75 - 1994 Toyota Supra RZ

>>14869399
> American market FDs catch on fire because horrible sequential system

File: 1983 RX7.jpg (120KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1000x667px

>>14869231
I like the FB more than the FD or FC.
I'm hunting for a cheap FB to project all over.

>>14869383
>>14869392
>all turbo engines are complicated and unreliable because an emissions-strangled sequential twin system on this one car is!
memes are dank!

>>14869292
>>14869440
To be fair, the Mazda rotary is less reliable when tarbod. Yes, rotaries are the best when turbocharged. But for the one factor of reliability, which affects the practicality of a car more than the speed, N/A is the way. Especially for someone who isn't a veteran of rotary engines.

File: 2002-honda-nsx-r[1].jpg (415KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 2000x1333px

NSX of course, since its the fastest of the bunch

File: ヴェイルサイドカタログBCNR33コンバットR20131220_2.jpg (125KB, 450x275px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 450x275px

>>14869406
>>14869406
NSX: IIII
Supra: III
R34: I
FD: I

Different cars are faster at different tracks? Who knew?

>>14866395
NSX.

The RX-7 and MKIV Supra are cheaper to import, and the GT-R is a big "pull me over and spend an hour trying to defect me" sign for HWP shitheads.

>>14869308
>N/A is responsive
your talking about a rotary here
a turbo will cause them no extra lag

>>14866395

Dorito mobile because this car is meant to be driven hard.

>>14869563
The only relevant results out of that list are the ones at tsukuba, and only half of those are valid (as in not randomly picked times from half way through a best motoring 10 lap race in the rain)

>>14866395
FD, because I prefer my car to be less than 1300kg.

>>14866480
Where are you seeing NSXes for $100k?
http://dallas.craigslist.org/ndf/cto/5538380187.html
http://dallas.craigslist.org/dal/cto/5526245680.html
I guess a late model one in absolutely pristine condition with few miles but these are what I've got in my city at the moment, but I've still never seen one near $100k.

>>14868403
Holy shit please go back to /v/ and fuck off