Which car company has consistently produced The absolute shittiest

>>14799151
Alfa romeo

>>14799164
They produced some shit cars, but many were very good looking, in my opinion. I'm talking about looks wise, reliability, just plain shit that almost no one would buy.

File: kpbbjokjyhayodityunc.jpg (55KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 800x450px

>>14799151

<<<This shit senpai

>>14799151
Rover or Fiat, definitely.

>>14799151
something we've never heard of from one of those no name countries like ecuador or portugal

>>14799151
is that meant to be some shit ripoff of an Aston Vantage?

File: Mr Regular.jpg (888KB, 960x2648px) Image search: [Google]

888KB, 960x2648px

>>14799151

C V P I
V
P
I

>>14799309
Yes actually, it's called the Austín Morton, produced in Bolivia. It's relatively cheap there, but many people still can't afford it.

>>14799151
British Leyland, obviously.

>>14799151
Those chink bootleg cars that was on top gear they was

>>14799151
Yugo

Chrysler

Acura

Pontiac.

>implying GTO
>implying G8

Saturn.

>implying that Mazda RX-8-thing

BMW

>>14799151
I've read troves of accounts of maseratis being extremely unreliable, even relative to the rest of the supercar market.

GM, Chrysler, or British Leyland

File: G-Wiz.jpg (22KB, 460x276px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 460x276px

>>14799151
REVA.

Since 1980? Easy. Chrysler.

Anything Japanese, German or British.

Anything American.

Chrysler, GM, Renault, Peugeot.

File: 406898fiat-duna-1083[1].jpg (176KB, 1800x940px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1800x940px

>>14799151
/o/, I am proud to present to you the marvelous Fiat Duna, aka The Absolute Shittiest Car Ever Made.

Here in Italy it's known as "the car that can tip over while parking despite havng four wheels"

>>14802296

what's wrong with it? it's literally just a normal Fiat Uno with a backpack

>>14802296
The Duna is a decent car, the shittiest thing about it it is the plastic bumpers that tend to break so fucking easily

>>14799390
2nd vote for Yugo

File: 2000px-ChryPly_Blue_Pentastar.svg.png (121KB, 2000x1958px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 2000x1958px

Chrysler

>all these at worst decent murrican and yuro manufactorers
Tata is the only answer. Literal shitboxes.
Only one that could compete would be some sovietic brand like Lada if it didn't have the Niva to redeem it, Zaz or Trabant.

File: Ssangyong Rodius.jpg (80KB, 1111x740px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1111x740px

>Chrysler
>Fiat
>Alfa Romeo
>British Leyland
>Rover
>GM
>Renault
>Peugeot
They've had their gems. Every single one of these has made at least one acceptable car.

Yugo would be a logical choice.

However, I nominate another company.
A company whose styling department seems to consist of nothing but blind people, whose quality control department doesn't seem to take their job seriously and whose safety department doesn't even seem to exist.

Ssangyong.

>>14800299
>saturn
No, nigga. You might disagree with the looks but they're fucking solid.

>>14804459
/thread

Chrysler and jeep hands down.
while other OEMs like Ford and chevy are increasing quality, Chrysler is going backwards.

>>14799151
Mopar

Up until the latest generation or two, KIA was the absolute worst. They had the ugliest fucking cars, had god-awful safety ratings, were dirty cheap, unmodifiable, completely unreliable, and threw rods like it was going out of style.

>>14799309
Get out

>>14804459
what is the point of that spoiler?

>>14804459
all of the Yugo problems are Fiat problems
and all of the jokes are trite slurs against Škoda
there really is allot of disinformation out there

>>14807385
to make it go faster

File: AMC_pacer_082009_D42119.jpg (897KB, 1900x1087px) Image search: [Google]

897KB, 1900x1087px

>>14799151
AMC
>Pacer

>>14799164
This. Alfa have great engines, 6 months of pure happiness then it all comes crashing down hard.

>>14799182
>Model S
>P90D

You can not like them, doesn't make them shit.

Even the roadster as overpriced as it was was a cool idea.

File: na2mA2KHgt2z0mUl.png (73KB, 250x164px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 250x164px

>>14802262

Saturn

File: 1449986870525.jpg (59KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 500x500px

>>14808276
>Leaving the seat folded up when you get out of the back seat of a coupe

File: Rover_75.jpg (872KB, 1600x960px) Image search: [Google]

872KB, 1600x960px

>>14799187
Maybe Leyland but not Rover

>>14802245
K Cars and minivans were good. The cloud cars were good as well until Daimler hit and the 2.7 was introduced. Chrysler itself was only really bad during the Daimler/Cerberus years and for a couple years in the late 70s (like every other domestic brand)

>>14799343
they produced the mini for a while,

>>14804459
yep this

>>14804459

Ssangyong is a very good answer, but lets be honest there is a reason why you don't see the Austin or Woseley brands any more, Morris being only slightly more common because Minor.

The reason was that the company was a fucking mess for 20+ years and produced shit quality cars that rusted to fuck all, didn't start properly half the time after only a few years ownership, etc etc

>source, everyone. Including unfortunate members of my family.

>>14799151

Volkswagen still exists fampai