My friend is selling me his gtr 2012 maxed out with 20k miles

>>14719317
Warranty is probably void.

>>14719317
No. I could buy most of my favorite cars for that price.

>>14719333
What car is faster than a gtr at 60k?

I would buy it for 50k and I'll pay for the shipping to my country.

>>14719317
would
if i was rich

>>14719333
>>14719349
>favorite
>faster
hahaha good shit lol

>>14719349
>car
lmao
>only caring about straight line speed and not considering straight line queens (literbikes)
lmaoooooooo americans hahahahahah

>>14719317
Inside is on par with a civic. Why not buy a marginally slower, but more luxurious car?

>>14719365
>implying its only on straight roads
>cant provide counter example
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1Z996UgJjF0

Nice shit post made me respond.

girls wont like your car and think youre a poorfag because of the brand nissand

you have better luck buying a volkswagen clone with that money (aka audi who even have the same brand parts) and call it a day if you want bitches on your dick

File: image.png (914KB, 2560x1600px) Image search: [Google]

914KB, 2560x1600px

isnt a gtr interior marginally better than an infinity's?

>>14719396
just look at how soulless 318 km/h feels in that car.
FUCK. this triggers me.
90 km/h feels better than that in my 25 year old shitbox.

>He risks his life at 318km/h for minimal satisfaction
>I go under the speed limit for 11/10 satisfaction

>>14719453
I can tell you're one of those honda civic drivers who think they are nascar racer driving at 50 miles in the highway because your car is making all that pointless shit muffler/exhaust you added.
Thanks for making me respond you shitty troll.

>>14719349
>What car is faster than a gtr at 60k?
Modern nissan fanboys everyone

WHO GIVES A SHIT

just buy what you like.

The car is a heavy pigfat pos that couldnt turn a corner without all of its computers.

There is a reason people dont run these in RWD only and its because they would handle like crap

how the fuck does it even weigh 3850lbs?

Seriously thats over 1.7tonnes thats INSANE

>>14719453
Pointless shit noise*
Nascar drivers*

>>14719396
>>14719453

of course it looks boring as fuck its on a nice highway

Try doing that on a B road you wont get to 200-250 before you shit your pants

>>14719317
>for only 65k
I wouldn't

whats the point of driving racing cars with the nazi police in the states?

its not like houll be able to drive above 120 without getting a fucking ticket

i rather buy a jeep with a sunroof and install a fridge inside with that money so i can chill with friends and do some dank roadtrips than waste it on that shit

>>14719556
same issue here in aus.

so many lovely roads ruined by HWP booking people for 'hooning' and shit just by going over our stupidly slow speedlimits (65mph EVERYWHERE maximum) and doing a little skid/race nobody gets hurt.

More fuckwhits die of fatigue ffs it shits me so hard.

Yanks just do what we do, go up b roads and back roads where cops dont go.

Sounds a bit much for an understeering boat OP. Invest that cash stash instead

>>14719482
>>14719475
samefag lol

>>14719475
84 fiero with stock exhaust but oookaay budddyy

>>14719669
I was fixing my typos idiot.

>Pull the trigger
Shoo shoo Jalopnig scum

>>14719317
The GTR is impressive, sure, but having driven a 2013 at a BIR, I have no urge to ever own one.

Also you say it's "maxed out" which makes me think it may have been tuned.

No thanks.

>>14719349
>What car is faster than a gtr at 60k?
Literally everything you want to tune that's cheap.

If my goal was maximum possible speed for 60k, I'd build a 3rd gen Trans Am.

300 mph club at Bonneville has been achieved for less in a turd gen.

>>14719479
Its literally the most stable hyperturbo car.
Can be daily driven without probs

>>14719317
Are you rich? If so, why not?
Do you have that money, maybe even more but not rich? then no.
Unless you live in germany for the free unlimited speed where you can actually get something out of your money then yes

>>14719453
>my car rattles itself apart and is blown around by the lightest gust of wind at highway speeds
>HUUR DUUR A SUPER CAR IS SOULLESS FOR TRAVELLING AT 300kmh WITHOUT BEING A DEATH TRAP
fuck off poorfag loser

>>14719779
Maxed out probably means loaded

File: NISMO_Bathurst_GTR_Launch_1.jpg (288KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 1200x800px

>>14719479
>There is a reason people dont run these in RWD
sorry what

File: 1445309294092.png (781KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

781KB, 960x720px

Get a Z28 so you'll be faster.

>>14719317
Does it need a new transmission? Because it probably needs a new transmission.

I would avoid but dig your own grave if you like.

>>14721385
no transmission 'problems' after 2010

>>14719317
>maxed out
what

still cant decide if i like its looks or not

the back is 10/10

side meh

front 7/10

>>14721417

It starts to look like a G37 with a bodykit after you've seen a couple hundred. It really only looks good in black.

>>14719479
What I find funny is the number of people that say the GTR is pig fat at 3700 to 3800lbs but will circle jerk over the ford mustang or new 6th gen camaro which weigh about the same to a little more.

Even the MKIV supra doesn't weigh a whole lot less. The US targa TT version came in at 3525 base and could almost get to 3600lbs by the time it was optioned out.

Most US drivers weigh more than the difference in weight between these 3 vehicles anyway.

As for the OPs question 65k is a little high for a 2012 GTR for about 5k more you can get a 2015 model which has more HP 545 compared to 520 in the 2012. There was also a lot of changes to the suspension between those years. Over all the 2012s are just less desirable because it was the first year of the DBA cars and still carried a lot of hold overs from the earlier CBA cars. If you could get it for around 58-62k it wouldn't be that bad of a deal.

>>14721417
>the back is 10/10

I disagree. The trunk is entirely too high from the ground making the lights too high up as well plus all that blank space underneath.

>>14721451
Fuck I can't unsee this now.

File: image.jpg (75KB, 640x353px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 640x353px

>>14721527
See r32 and r33

Where the trunk and tail lights should be.

>>14719365
as a person who loves motorcycles and cars nothing triggers me more than people who imply fast motorcycles are a valid substitute for fast cars

>>14719349
It's great grandfather, modded?

>>14719317

I'd get a hellcat with that money famo.

>>14719453
Satisfaction i hitting 210km/h in your shitty hatckback when wikipedia says it's top speed is 157.

>>14721553
I still think the R34 looks way better

>>14722245
2 is WIIIIIDE. Damn.

>>14722245
It looks better in every way.

I'd rather get an R34 and keep it stock at 320 rather than getting an R35 and having everything being done for you by the computerized systems.

File: initial-d-328425.jpg (62KB, 800x1219px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 800x1219px

>>14722304
R34 is filled with computers too you know. Or do you think dct vs stick shift is the only thing?