http://www.expressandstar.com/news/ 2016/01/21/rebecca-mcman

Yeah because boring cars can't go 100mph

>gun grabbers have inspired car grabbers

RIP in piece

File: ViperREEEEEEE.png (756KB, 605x319px) Image search: [Google]

756KB, 605x319px

>38% of people voted "yes"
HOLY FUCKING SHIT

>Sukvinder Mannan

Sounds like they should ban foreigners.

>>14312661
38% of people who read that site.

>>14312667
I know. It still makes me rage though.

>>14312606
>Mr McManus said it was natural that owners of cars capable of reaching high speeds would want to test them to their limits and that the only place they could do that was on public roads.

And people say opinions can't be wrong, what a fucking retard.

The UK as a whole literally disgusts me

>>14312673
Jesus how ignorant can someone be?

It's just a kneejerk, but that said, it's irresponsible fucks that create these sentiments. Why the fuck was he travelling at 100 MPH?

File: mugs.jpg (36KB, 1000x627px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 1000x627px

>dat smirk

POO
IN
MY
LOO

>UK

will you ever catch a break from nazi nannies?

>>14312683
I was just playing GT6 with a friend from the UK the other day and he was saying there are tracks everywhere there.

>>14312692
Because he felt the NEED FOR SPEED.

File: clarkson smug.png (173KB, 389x389px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 389x389px

>>14312606
>Mr McManus called for changes to the law surrounding high-performance vehicles, including marketing not being able to refer to performance or speed and people wishing to drive them having a special category on their licence which allows them to drive off road or on a racetrack early.

are there pics of him? I bet he's pretty much the embodiment of cuckoldry.

>>14312606

>It's in the UK
>It's a foregone conclusion

Is there any solid argument against this? I love my car but if someone seriously came at me with "explain to me why all cars shouldn't be restricted to the local speed limit." I wouldn't have a good argument against.

>>14313229
5 mph is enough to kill someone

this is why you don't ride the bus

>>14313235
Not to mention any shitbox can get to 100mph.

File: hqdefault.jpg (43KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 480x360px

>britbong land having an arab problem

live pictures coming from some shithole in the UK

File: 1995_chevrolet_lumina-pic-8768299462879480895-640x480.jpg (137KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 640x480px

>>14312606
>sports cars
Kek, when I was a teenager I used to fly around at 120mph in something very similar to pic related

>>14313229
Is this bait?

>>14313274
If anything people who own reasonably expensive sports cars would be more inclined to take care of them. 99% of the time someone fucks up going Dagumi it's some shitbox Civic

>>14313301
Usually it's someone in their beat to shit Impreza or base model 3-series that thinks they have a rallycar/sports car, some fag in a riced Golf GTI or some idiot in a riced Corsa that thinks they're in F&F.

>>14313308
Yeah I was going to mention Imprezas, base model E39s and hot hatches in general that also do this shit.

>>14313324
There's the reason the insurance on a Golf GTI is more than double that of a Passat from the same year with the exact same engine.

>55mph national speed limit
>govern all cars to 85 under normal circumstances
>governor can be unlock by a licensed overseer (police officer, track employee, etc)

Problem solved. It's just one of those common-sense measures that neanderthals shouldn't be against, like mandatory gun registration and a one-day license to buy ammunition at a supervised range.

File: 1437724897409.jpg (18KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 300x300px

>limeys

such a shame, I want to move to scotland

>>14313347
Can still speed what the fuck is wrong with you

>>14313292

No, it's not.

>>14313265
>>14313235

And what if there were a system implemented by law in every car, that regulates the speed of the car via GPS according to the speed limit for that area? Of course pedestrians can still get killed by getting hit by a car at 5mph. But fatalities would be reduced from people not doing 85 mph in the rain and hydroplaning into a disabled car full of kids. And that's just one scenario, but can you give me a different scenario where the idea is bad?

Keep in mind I'm playing the Devils advocate here, but I can't find an argument saying "this would make things worse". That's why I'm asking.

>>14313365
speed limits should be enforced via GPD near schools and supermarkets and so on

no reason to implement it on the backrods and shit

>>14313347
>>14313365
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

File: 1445301922341_1.jpg (12KB, 160x298px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 160x298px

>>14313347
Get fucked, commie.

>>14312606
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/grieving-dad-student-killed-101mph-7216997

Here's another poll.

Fuck I hate people.

>>14313384
>>14313373
>freedom aint free
>the tree of liberty gotta be littered with the blodd of car accidents

>>14313347
>registration
>license
>shooting at ranges

bootlicker

File: 1433667752947.png (39KB, 156x129px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 156x129px

>>14313392
>tfw voting no

File: englandyes2.png (4MB, 3902x3733px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3902x3733px

ENGLAND

YES

>>14313372
Or kids can get the fuck out of the road. I'm not advising hooning outside of schools but those limits are absurdly low and the technology being used period is an extremely slippery slope.

File: viper.jpg (44KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 600x600px

>>14313405
>girl was run over while waiting on a bus stop on the sidewalk
>"out of the road"
>le slippery slope fallacy

why dont you take your brakes off your car gommie?

>>14313365
1. Everyone would drive with their foot on the floor because they don't need to check their speed meaning if any malfunction in this system occurred they would most likely crash into the car in front or a corner pedestrians etc.
2. Price.
3. It would be so easy to disable it would be a huge waste of money.
4. Make people hate police even more.
5. No business and hardly any civilians would want to agree to this.
6. There would be virtually no need for advances in mechanical technology.
7. If you hit someone at the speed limit which everyone will probably be doing people would still die.
8. Again people constantly going the top end of the speed limit expecting to be able to take corners at that speed limit in any conditions.
9. People going too slow would become a huge issue because it would be much more difficult to overtake safely making more angry drivers and people making stupid decisions behind the wheel.

I'm sure there is more but if this was a good idea it would've been at least considered

>>14313384
>>14313373

I didn't mention gun control like the other faggot. Driving is a privelege, not a right protected in the constitution.

>>14313372
But why not?

You see this is the problem I came to. I have no good argument against it.

>>14313392
Yeah but who under 60 reads the mirror and then those that re intelligent as well the numbers are slim friend

>>14312716
Wouldn't say they're everywhere, but for a lot of people you can drive to a track in the morning and drive back in the evening

>>14313418
>But why not?
because there are no risks of killing pedestrians on the backroads and highways

>>14313428
I dont agree with the speed limit car restriction shit but that's a stupid comment come on. People get out of their car from break downs etc on the highway and people walk on backroads with no lights at night. Also it's not just about pedestrians but fucking up other car users as well

>>14313448
literally no reason not to control the speed limit on urban areas

>>14313455

kill yourself

File: mugs.jpg (65KB, 452x623px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 452x623px

Perhaps just ban brown-ish people from driving

It would have hurt less if the driver was white

File: freedumbs.jpg (69KB, 780x497px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 780x497px

>>14313465
>t. spurdo sparde

why does your car have brakes, or lights, or a windshield, are you a gommie?

>>14313455
Can you argue all of these points
>>14313416

>>14313479
>brakes

because flintstoning sure works

>lights

darkness fuels my car
and my heart

>windshield

second half of the word says it all

>>14313500
get a load of this fucking gommunist, his car still has brakes and lights!

freedom aint free billy

pray for our troops

>>14313493
none of that matters because it would only be inforced in urban areas

people dont drive at the speed limit in the suburbs anyway

>implying we will still need speed limits when cars drive themselves

>>14313541
there are multiple on there that would cause issues in urban areas... I now know why you couldn't think of any reasons yourself you fucking moron

>>14313541
>>14313569

we would be better off if the world was purged of people like these posters

>>14313404

america isnt doing much better you dipshit

>>14313570
>there are multiple on there that would cause issues in urban areas
such as?

>>14312606
My dads transit connect can go 100. My 10 year old F150 is governed at 100. Why are non car people so fucking stupid

>>14313595
1/2/3/4/7/8 maybe 9

>>14313623
those are all fucking retarded arguments
literally the only valid one is the fact that people might disable it

>>14313633
If someone is retarded enough to drive 100 mph in an urban area why wouldnt they be retarded enough to drive top speed everywhere they go

POO IN LOO

File: 1410070830236.jpg (759KB, 5000x5000px) Image search: [Google]

759KB, 5000x5000px

>>14312606
>it's in the UK
Why am I not fucking surprised? The UK are becoming bigger cucks than Australia at this point

>>14313365
GPS isn't reliable enough, poor coverage in certain areas. For example what happens when you go through a tunnel? It disables the limit? Then why not just buy a £10 jammer?

>>14313601
But how long does it take a non sports car to get to 100?

File: caterham-620-3-lg.jpg (66KB, 980x551px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 980x551px

>>14314848
But not when it comes to cars, surely?

>>14318141
I can get a 2011 chevy equinox there in probably 20-25 seconds.

File: mcmanus.jpg (68KB, 850x547px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 850x547px

>>14312606
>McManus
First thing that came to mind.

File: when they grabbed the guns i did not speak up because i dont have a gun.jpg (61KB, 680x512px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 680x512px

>>14312643
Anon, you don't *need* that high capacity clip.
Anon, you don't *need* that high velocity car.

What In the fuck is that chick doing at a bus stop at night and what the fuck is a bus stop doing dead in the middle of the road? I cannot fathom how she could've gotten hit unless she went onto the road, then its just Darwinism at its best

>>14312606
Looks like another reason not to move to the uk.

>>14312606

>Mr McManus said it was natural that owners of cars capable of reaching high speeds would want to test them to their limits and that the only place they could do that was on public roads.

What are track days

>>14313229

Any "normal" car, so the likes of a 1.2 Clio or a 1.6 Focus will still do 100mph and kill someone

It has nothing to do with the car, it is HOW the car is being driven. Driver education is the problem, and "BAN THEM" isn't the answer.

>>14312606
I skewed the results for you guys lol

We're at about 75% now

>>14318642
We have 885/1168 votes right now

>>14318141
Seconds longer. It feels longer to us because we appreciate automobiles but to normies a 10 second vs 12 second 0-100 is the same

>>14313392
>>14312606

Fix it, /o/!!!!

>>14313269

A tripfag that can't destinguish ethnicities.. It's like you guys want everybody to know that you all are retarded.

Tripfag.