Had a lady yell at me how terrible Nissan is because Chrysler

2 questions. Is that your GTR? Who are you?

I'm a newfag sorry.

>>14069020
not op but I can tell you right off the bat that isn't his gtr. Lurk for at least a month before posting

>>14069176
>>14069020
actually maybe it is but probably not

Trust fund kid from school get Nismo 370z
"wow dude, sweet ride"
look inside,
"dude, its automatic..."
kid gets quiet.
>comes in next day with gtr
just

>>14069185
>things that never happened

>>14069185
e/b/in

File: Nissan Skyline GT-R R34.jpg (210KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 1280x960px

Fuck it

R34 thread

>>14069353
>muh RB
>muh straight 6 twin turbo 300hp engine

>>14069359
you do realise that Japan had a 280ps power limit right
you are not actually rertarded... right?

>>14069371
No, the manufacturers self imposed the 'limit' and by the mid 90s most were lying out of their ass about it.

File: 1447028306066.gif (361KB, 327x400px) Image search: [Google]

361KB, 327x400px

>>14069371
>muh weabooism
>muh underpowered 6cyl twin turbo

weebs on suicide watch

>>14069185
>still automatic

File: 20151104_081441.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

>>14069020
Wish it was but no.

>>14069385
>R34 GT-R
>underpowered
Still makes more than your mom's crossover.

File: 2016-bmw-x6m-29-1[1].jpg (133KB, 750x422px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 750x422px

>>14069427
>imblyign

>>14069427
>6 cylinder TWIN TURBO
>only 300hp

>>14069441
>suv
Sure pal, sure.

>>14069451
Isn't it pretty much confirmed that the rated hp was bullshit or nah?

>>14069451
>tfw even dodge caravans come with 300hp now

What a time to be alive

>>14069468
confirmed where

>>14069470
I don't know, I'm just parroting, but based on the actual performance of the car and the rumors I'm lead to believe it's true.

>>14069371
>>14069451
>>14069380
It was rated at 276HP but actually makes 321 HP (at the wheels) stock. They are pretty darn fast.

>>14069468
Supposedly yeah, both the supra and gtr made more power than the 270hp or whatever the gentleman's agreement was

I think the only one that actually stayed true to it was honda with nsx

>>14069451
>at the wheels
>>14069470
Here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMPTMkNRKbg
>inb4 exhaust
Nismo bits you could have installed at the dealer.

>>14069482
>>14069487
321hp out of a 6cyl twin turbo? damn that's really amazing

if it were '80s

>>14069490
A 375HP car in the late 1990s was pretty good.

>>14069490
302 whp = 355 crank hp. Which isn't all that bad for a 3.0L, TT or not, if you're not being a dyno queen and want a useable powerband, typically a "lower" number like 355 will actually be faster than a 700hp car that finally spools 500rpm from redline.

>>14069504
Wait, I forgot about the AWD, so it's more like 20% loss, so >>14069498 saying 375 crank is right on the money.

>>14069504
The RB26 is, you guessed it, 2.6L.

>>14069490
Your daily makes the same power out of 5.9 liters.

>>14069561
with an engine design from the '70s

>>14069353
>dat aerodynamically designed b pillar

File: godzilla wins again.jpg (74KB, 629x750px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 629x750px

so much mad ITT