What's the best sports car for under $10k and why is it the sw20 turbo?
>>14059811
Best sports car under $10k is a Celica GT-S swapped MR2 Spyder.
>>14059821
hard to find that or do it yourself for $10k.
Porsche boxter is way better
>14059811
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/sgv/cto/5351682633.html
I'll be waiting for you at the local dive bar.
c u there, senpai
>>14059824
MR-S with a blown engine is $4-5k. Engine and transmission from a wrecked Celica is $2-3k. You need a $300 swap header and a $300 harness adapter and everything pretty much bolts up.
>>14059892
maybe. is it better than a sw20?
you can get a good one for $7. The extra $3k could get you upgraded suspension, better tires, and probably 260 crank hp.
>>14059900
7k*
>>14059900
It's basically a Lotus Elise. Same engine and transaxle at that point, and the same suspension geometry. Then it's just a matter of buying cast off Elise parts as you find them for cheap.
>>14059914
no it isn't really.
why do you say things you don't know as if they're true?
You can swap in an engine used in an elise pretty easily (and it was probably designed for it), and the suspension may have been designed with help from lotus, but the vehicles are not at all the same.
>>14059928
>Same platform
>Same drivetrain
>Same suspension geometry
>Nearly everything that's not bodywork is single part interchangeable
Sure, it's like comparing a STI-swapped WRX to an STI, but you can't claim they're not fundamentally the same vehicle.
the MR-S is the better MR, the EP3 and the FD2 civics are better and gaster
>>14060000
>those quads
SW20fags absolutely cucked
>>14059992
sources please.
all i've read seems to contradict this but it's mostly forum posts
>>14060000
> EP3 and FD2 are faster than a SW20
citation needed
sw20 is heavy and underpowered
>>14060049
uh, it's 2700lbs so it's heavy compared to an AW11 or MR-S, but you can make 300hp on stock internals with minor upgrades.
>>14060061
>just a few simple mods
its the frs of the 90s
>>14060096
no, turbo cars in general are significantly under-tuned from the factory.
All you need is a fuel cut remover and boost controller to make ~240 at the crank.
>>14060024
https://youtu.be/1MJ72S7wazo?t=10m50s
mr-s lap tsukuba in 1:11 the FD2 and EP3 lap it in the 1:08 range https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEmO_8b05ac
toyota simply cant compete
>>14060170
i thought you were saying those civics were faster than a turbo sw20.
MR-S is nice for sure, but the SW20 is great also.
>>14060170
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFEi-0Rx6J0
you were saying?
>>14059837
my parents have one, 2004 naturally aspirated, I get to drive it every so often
fantastic driving car, flat 6 burble behind you, revs to 7.5k rpm and the power always feels like it's on tap even if you're in 4th at 2k rpm, crap tons of grip, firm (very heavy feeling) steering, long throw of the shifter, ignition on the left side for traditions sake
saying it's a poor mans 996 really is a compliment to this car
plus it's just constant compliments from normies who see the Porsche badge, bright color and headlights from the 996 and think it's a super car
>>14060189
>muh poopra!
toyota simply cant compete
>>14060323
> forgot that the SW20 spanked the rest of the cars
> forgot that toyota made the SW20
>>14060323
Is this the new shitpost meme? A GT car vs a Ferrari competitor?
>>14059811
I bought my MR2 turbo for $4000 AUD, which is under $2900 USD. It's not shit either. Fucking win
That's not the E36 M3, OP.
>>14060323
Dedicated track car vs plush ass GT loaded with options. Strip every creature comfort out of Supra and it would wreck an NSX around the track. I'd much rather own an NSX but its not because of the numbers it would put up on the internet.
>>14060379
if you can get a solid M3 for 10k then I won't begrudge your choice a bit.