hey /o/, this seems to be an appropriate place to ask, as I assume

why do you want that old thing in your car?

File: androidauto-2.0.jpg (249KB, 2040x1360px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 2040x1360px

Android Auto and Apple Car Play exist now
Carputers are obsolete, though Windows 8/10 would have been great interfaces

Why not use an atom based system instead? Like the pipo x7s, you can easily fit it behind a double din. It's also more suitable for a car because it's passively cooled and uses less than 10w

>>13948601
What's a good captive touchscreen monitor that'll fit in a double DIN slot, have a decent resolution, and not cost as much as a tablet with a much better screen?

>>13948662
search the chinese site and find one
most of them are made in china anyway
http://www.aliexpress.com
i bet theres got to be one there.

File: Intel-Quad-Core-1-83Ghz-Windows-8-1-tablet-pcs-8-inch-IPS-screen-RAM-1GB.jpg_640x640.jpg (137KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 640x640px

>>13948662
Actually, why not use an Atom powered Windows tablet from China?
They're like $80 and would fit into a double DIN slot pretty well

>>13948590
that looks good, does it dim at night with the dash?

>>13948688
I would assume so, considering it was made for use in cars by Google. Probably switches to a dark theme as well

>>13948496
what purpose would it serve that a cell phone with bluetooth could not ?

seems unnecessary m8

Cellphones are pretty shit compared to computers

File: Untitled.png (41KB, 415x404px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 415x404px

>>13948741
lol what
i guarantee a 6s is faster than my computer

>>13948866
Intel brought down their power usage faster than ARM made their chips more powerful.
iPhones don't have shit on Intel Atom powered phones like the Zenfone 2

>>13948908
i think a qualcomm 810 would rape my computer though.

>>13948928
Is your computer a potato clock?

>>13948935
how did you not even see the photo?

>>13948943
Core 2 Duo isn't that old, m8

Computer processors haven't really gotten any faster in over 5 years

>>13948948
but phones sure as fuck have. you do not change my mind at all

>>13948958
And they're still not as powerful as a decent X86 chip. However the x86 chips have gotten far more power efficient and as a result can now be used to power phones and tablets

>>13948948
>Computer processors haven't really gotten any faster in over 5 years
They have, and the Core 2 Duo he has in incredibly old. 2007.

>>13948963
>5% performance increase every year
Thanks Intel