Jill Stein is raising money for recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan,

>"The Green Party has always been at the forefront of fights to stand up for our democracy," Figueroa said.

>Stein also announced a fund-raising campaign to "demand recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania," where the campaign claimed there are "significant discrepancies in vote totals."

>As of midday Wednesday, Stein had raised less than $10,000. That's nowhere near her goal of raising $2.5 million by Friday, which is around $500,000 less than she raised in the entire election cycle.

>It's unclear why Stein is raising money to spur a recount that would in theory throw the election to Clinton, whom Stein called the "queen of corruption."

>The Guardian reported on Tuesday that activists had approached Stein, who declined to pursue a recount, citing a lack of funds.

>The Green Party candidate appears to be slightly in debt. According to a Federal Election Commission filing from mid-October, Stein had just under $30,000 less on hand than she owed in campaign debts.

Despite the FBI's contention that Russia was involved in several hacks aimed at sewing discord within in the Democratic Party, many experts argued that the claims of actual vote interference appear thin.

Sources in New York magazine's report argued that there may be electronic voting machine manipulation. However, although Pennsylvania primarily relies on electronic voting machines, experts contend that they're virtually unhackable because they are so outdated and do not have internet connection capabilities. And Michigan uses only paper ballots.

>Vox noted that New York magazine's report presented only one clear example of voting discrepancies. According to the New York magazine report, Clinton performed worse on average in Wisconsin counties that used electronic voting machines, but it could be that Trump simply performed better in those counties.

>Princeton polling expert Sam Wang argued that polling error appeared far more likely:

From what I hear, MI already did a recount, in PA you have to go before a judge and show hard evidence of electoral fraud, and in WI the margin isn't even close enough to justify a recall.

>>87512
Does any of this require an unaffected party to pay money for?
Seems like the green party is just trying to gather up funds.

I'll be honest, I have no idea why the steins party differs from any other party. In other words, neither does any average American.

>>87491
She's pulling a bernie

>>87517
It would be cheaper than building a wall and would only expose corruption similar to wikileaks. I'd like to know exactly how rampant voter fraud is since Obama seems to think it doesn't happen.

>Retards actually gave this woman 2 million american dollars

Goddamn this is amazing. Nothing will come of this regardless but I'm holding out hope she just takes the money and runs with it because it'd be even funnier that way.

Hillary Clinton will win The US Presidential Election 2016.

>>87527
97% chance of winning. I read this on HuffingtonPost so it's true.

>>87527
>Liberals are deluding themselves into believing the election isn't over.

>>87515
>>Does any of this require an unaffected party to pay money for?
this. I do not understand why they claim to need 2M, they literally do not say why.

>>87491
Does this remind anyone else of the payday mission where you are sent in to manipulate voting machines for one party but when you get discovered, you have to quickly switch the votes over so it seems like there is blatant evidence of manipulation caused by the other party?

>>87544
>liberals
Where? He said Clinton.

>>87517
The Green Party is merely there to soak up disaffected Democrats and then recycle them back into the party.

>a Jew jewing disaffected voters out of millions for an impossible venture based on "computer scientists" findings from a far left website to have a recount that Hillary already said she didn't want

>>87515
>>87557
States often require the party filing for the recount to shoulder the costs for the recount.

elections.wi.gov/sites/default/files/publication/65/recount_manual_23968.pdf