http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/08/22/gawker-has-now-ceased-operations/
It's over and done and gooooooooood.
>>68559
Justice
>>68594
Breitbart doesn't count shlock celebrity stories as news, and they don't post people's sex tapes online, nor do they then brazenly defend their actions while condemning others who do the same
>>68594
>How in the fuck is Breitbart any better than Gawker?
It's less obnoxious. Yes, it is. At least Breitbart didn't post a celebrity sex tape, ignore a court order to remove it, then complain to the world that they were having their freedom of speech impeded when they got fucked over for not following a court order, and then have one of their retards say they'd publish child porn (don't you even fucking dare say he was joking, of course he was. But how fucking arrogant do you have to be to make jokes in a situation like that)
And they did this while having previously called anyone who shared some cunt's nudes the worst people in the world.
>>68664
Wait so you are telling me a story that Newman from Seinfeld went to Israel for a few days to do an Ikea advertisement is quality news? This isn't some anti-semite click bait for the far-right?
Breitbart didn't get blasted for making up some friends of hamas bullshit and then continued to lie about it?
They didn't post Anthony Weiner's dick pic?
Brietbart is click bait garbage. Brietbart claiming Gawker is shit is like the pot calling the kettle black.
>>68770
Nick Denton pls go
>>68770
Breitbart doesn't ignore a court order and then make an article about how they were given a court order but will not follow it.
Oh, and post a woman getting raped. Breitbart hasn't done that yet.
My favorite thing about the sex tape ordeal is that Gawker defended it by claiming that Hogan is a celebrity so the tapes were of "public interest." But what about the woman on the tape? She wasn't a celebrity. They completely glaze over this point.
>>68866
Didn't the Fappening happen between the Hogan tape getting posted, and then them refusing to follow a court order to remove the Hogan tape?
Their hypocrisy of saying it's okay to share explicit images of some people without their consent, but not others, is what got to me.
>breitbart
Sure, let's whine about a sensationalist clickbait site with a link to another sensationalist clickbait site!
You're a fucking idiot, OP.
>>68559
like a fart, gawker quietly vanishes.
>>68898
you realize that gawker isn't a single hivemind?
it's basically e-journalists that most of the time post opinions of actual news
>>69120
Gawker media has a team of managers and editors who set the tone. Their leaders are responsible for their appalling direction