Trump thinks it's okay to punch somebody if they hurt your

>>28500
It's funny how some of them are treating the BLM and bernie people like terrorists and saying they're the ones who started it.

>>28508
How is that not the truth?

>>28508
The OP was about the NC protester being punched. In that case the guy was saying that it was okay to punch the protester, and next time he might have to kill him, because he might be part of ISIS for all they know. So like literally treating them like terrorists.

The Chicago protests, Bernie Bros and BLM actually do deserve a lot of the blame from what I can tell. Ripping signs out of people's hands, pushing, blocking people, blocking a fucking ambulance with its siren on. Wasn't good behavior

>>28524
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Donald_Trump_Chicago_rally_protest

>>28526
>wikipedia
kek
Pro-Tip: Never trust wikipedia for anything even related to social justice or feminism.

http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=5028

>>28528
People like you who don't understand that wikipedia is based on citations should really kill themselves before they accidentally reproduce. Don't shoot the messenger, kid.

>>28529
You can still be victim to one - sided reporting.

That can always be the case.

>>28508
That was one crazy guy getting out of hand and punching some asshole in the face. The protest at the rally was a riot that shut down the entire event. That's BLM and Move On getting so butthurt about some offensive comments that hurt some people's feelings that they said screw the right to assemble peacefully. You wanna talk about too sensitive, look at the protesters. They threw a damn riot over lack of PC.

>>28530
The thing about wikipedia is, if you can prove with citations that any page is wrong, they invite it to edit it yourself. What's that? They shut down the revision? It's completely transparent when they do that and they page they reverted from is visible 99.9% of the time.

I've found that people who complain about wikipedia either don't understand it or have an agenda to discount what's on there for whatever reason.

>>28531
I've said it in other /news/ threads but even though I don't agree with the protesters, I'm just happy someone violated that stupid Free Speech Zone law. Now Trump has said in the past 12 hours that he's going to start prosecuting though so the ramifications of that remain to be seen. I just watched Trump on one of the sunday morning shows basically saying (paraphrasing:) "It'd be a real shame if some Trump supporters showed up to a Bernie rally sometime soon.". Either way it's starting to get a lot more Jerry Springer like every time Trump holds a rally, for better or worse.

I'm just surprised that no one has accused Trump's idea to make a law so you can sue people for insulting you as being Liberal PC bullshit. If you look at it that's kind of what it is since if some one calls someone else an idiot or a jackass they can be accused of "slander" and be sued.

>>28534
> "It'd be a real shame if some Trump supporters showed up to a Bernie rally sometime soon."
No, Trump, don't get ol' Bernie Sanders all riled up now...

>>28529
People like you who think they understand wikipedia but actually don't should kill yourselves

>>28533
You too.
>transparency
maybe to the 0.001% of people who go look through the logs. When you happen upon a wikipedia page, how often do you sift through the hundreds of prior revisions? Oh never? So how is their existence relevant if nobody ever reads them? You're fucking delusional if you don't realize how much bias there is on Wikipedia articles, especially regarding social issues. If you bothered to look at the link >>28528 you can see that colleges literally offer college credit to encourage students to inject feminist bias into wikipedia articles. Entire pages get deleted due to bias. There has been a ton of controversy over the GamerGate article on there.
If you're going to be completely oblivious to what goes on with Wikipedia at least try not being condescending about it

>>28500
People have been going to Trump rallies and attacking supporters for months now, but nobody ever covered it because they didn't care. Trump even came inches away from being hit in the face with a tomato one time, but I don't think anyone ever said a word about it.

Also, it's actually illegal to protest around someone under SS protection, so all these guys are breaking the law.

If people wanna air out their vaginas over Trump they can do it outside or on the internet, but once you break into a private event and start shit, you got shit coming right back.

>>28562
>When you happen upon a wikipedia page, how often do you sift through the hundreds of prior revisions? Oh never? So how is their existence relevant if nobody ever reads them
I do every time and more people do than you realize. Don't blame everyone else because you're the idiot who doesn't take advantage of the transparency available to him.
>If you bothered to look at the link >>28528 you can see that colleges literally offer college credit to encourage students to inject feminist bias into wikipedia articles.
No I read it and it's bullshit. Half a dozen competing groups both pro and anti any subject could revise and every single time they did shows up in the log.
>Entire pages get deleted due to bias
Well then they shouldn't be biased then, eh?
>Gamergate
Oh, now I see.. You're one of those who sees femen boogeymen everywhere. No wonder. Wikipedia is valid for everyday use whether you like it or not, kid, but if you're trying to write your college paper based on it then you've got problems.

Ignoring the Wikipedia discussion, this is something I really should have seen coming.

Trump is all about rounding up the people who are normally pushed to the side by the traditional political system. Racist, uninformed, and people who vote based on personality over policy. So people who just want to start fist fights isn't to far off from what he has already done. I wouldn't be surprised if some people switched to Trump just so they could have an excuse to punch people and get away with it.

This is what I both love and hate about Trump, I hate him for obvious reasons, but it would be dishonest to say that part of me that enjoys watching him damage the republican party worse than the Tea party.

>>28500
>talk shit
>get hit
Problem?

Wait,so only leftshits,blacks,ragheads and asians can react when someone is throwing shit at them?

>>28682
>leftshits
Hi /pol/. How are you this evening?

>>28500
Why are liberals pussies?

>>28683
Calling everything that is not hugboxing or anti-trump /pol/ is just as bad as /pol/posting

>>28697

Calling everything that is not hugboxing or pro-trump liberal is just as bad as /pol/posting

>>28627
The mentality of this post is why Trump has so much support.

>>28627

read this >>28708

>>28529
It is because of these terrible sites and promoters like you that people still dare to cite 'vaccines cause autism'.

>>28544
He's right. The bbb false rating was pretty blatant. Hell that reporting claiming she was thrown to the ground and reporting it even going so far as to file a report when theres video that show her claims were false.

No one but one guy in these threads is pushing that angle. Try getting a redaction from the press and tell us how they pass you through the ringer for daring to file a claim.

>>28562
>mentioning gamergate
Way to fucking destroy your own credibility, idiot
Didnt you newfag butthurt chanology wannabes make your own chan? Why dont you go there instead?

>>28735
>associating Wikipedia with the vaccine deniers
Where do you people get this shit?

>>28508
>and saying they're the ones who started it.
Well they did show up to a god damn trump rally so of course they started it

>>28529
>who don't understand that wikipedia is based on citations
They can be of pretty poor quality.
With citation leading to bad sources, or sometimes you can even follow the citation and it doesn't say at all what wikipedia says, even the opposite.

>>28778
Trump incited it by telling his followers he'd pay for their legal bills.

http://www.japantoday.com/category/world/view/trump-rallies-raise-questions-about-inciting-violence

>>28780
>They can be of pretty poor quality.
[citation needed]

>>28525
Awww wasn't good behavior?

If you get punched, you punch back. If your friend gets punched by a bully, you punch back at the bully. Or are you a victim troll who stands by watching your friend punch someone without provocation, then you cry, oh, the media was so unfair to show that, they are naaaaasty, people are unhappy, when we bring out the water hoses they should just sit down. Back in my day they would have taken those nignogs out on a stretcher. America.

Donald is invulnerable. He has been begging for secret service since he tried to run last time. Last time he didn't get it. Now that she has it, she acts like a mentally ill trap procted by mods on all sides. Procted and knowing she is get away with anything, done nothing wrong, all other are the bully.

>>28837
>Donald is invulnerable
As long as the three remaining candidates have more delegates than Donald then he is quite vulnerable.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/07/why-florida-and-ohio-are-the-only-states-that-matter-in-the-republican-presidential-race-in-3-charts/

>>28784
Lawyer here again. No court will help the arrested because of that. Cheers.
>mfw seeing the 'peaceful' protester line among others, yours included, today in some of these bond cases

One of them broke down into tears because he couldn't pay and he kept shouting that his rights were infringed on as he turned violent and had to be tasered down.

You don't actually understand your rights people, please educate yourselves on them.

>>28851
lol wrong.

http://www.wral.com/presidential-candidates-crisscross-nc-on-final-day-before-primary/15536839/
>Last week, Trump visited Concord and Fayetteville in rallies that attracted thousands of attendees. During the rally in Fayetteville, a protester was assaulted as he was escorted from Crown Coliseum by police. A Linden man was later charged in the incident, and Cumberland County Sheriff's Office investigators said Monday that they are considering filing a charge of inciting a riot against Trump.

>North Carolina law defines a riot as "a public disturbance involving an assemblage of three or more persons which by disorderly and violent conduct, or the imminent threat of disorderly and violent conduct, results in injury or damage to persons or property or creates a clear and present danger of injury or damage to persons or property." Inciting a riot is a misdemeanor unless the disturbance causes serious injury or more than $1,500 in property damage, when it becomes a felony.

>Ronnie Mitchell, the attorney for the Cumberland County Sheriff's Office, said that, during a review of video evidence in the case, investigators took note of Trump making comments during the removal of several protesters at the event.

>>28853
>lol wrong
You should take up the bar here in Chicago then. The internet clearly 'Trumps' my 15+ years of experience precedents and the Judge. Case closed!

>>28856
The word "Chicago" means "place of wild garlic/onion plants" in Algonquin. It's very fitting.

>>28856
>libtards don't know obama quietly ammended current law to make protesting a crime of up to a year in prison
wether they go that long for max punishment or not is beyond me they prolly settle for fines+probation right?

>>28837
>Donald is invulnerable. He has been begging for secret service since he tried to run last time. Last time he didn't get it. Now that she has it, she acts like a mentally ill trap procted by mods on all sides. Procted and knowing she is get away with anything, done nothing wrong, all other are the bully.

Why did Donald Trump switch pronouns in the middle of this post?
>Donald's gender is now as fluid as his stance on policies.

WTF this Trump dude is messing things up. This shit is funny: http://uckdrumpf.com

>>28529
>Wikipedia articles cite to such credible sources as Jezebel and Vox
>therefore there is no bias
Kek you're a fucking moron

>>28863
Specifically IIRC the law is for disrupting an event with secret service. So if you don't disrupt the event or it there's no SS it's fine, but if you disrupt a place where there's secret service (which Trump has) then it's illegal. At least that's what I heard.
Idk what other candidates have SS, they don't all have them do they? Trump does and I think Hillary, but idk about others

>the other parties supporters are idiots who can't control themselves
>better go show them how much self control we have