[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Trump warns special investigator Muller against investigating

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 55
Thread images: 1

File: 1500011887458.jpg (6KB, 83x88px) Image search: [Google]
1500011887458.jpg
6KB, 83x88px
President Trump warned special counsel Robert Mueller from investigating his family’s finances beyond the scope of the probe into ties between his administration and Russia in an interview with The New York Times on Wednesday.

>“I think that’s a violation. Look, this is about Russia,” Trump told The Times.

>Trump during the interview said he wasn’t ruling out firing Mueller as special counsel on the Russia probe.

>He did not say that he would order the Justice Department to fire Mueller or under what circumstances he would fire him, but he indicated Mueller investigating his family's finances would cross a line.

>Trump also noted he previously interviewed Mueller to replace Comey as FBI director shortly before he was named special counsel.

>Trump also said Mueller’s office had several conflicts of interest, including Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. Trump said Rosenstein was playing both sides in Trump’s decision to fire former FBI Director James Comey by recommending the firing but then appointing Mueller as special counsel.

>“Well, that’s a conflict of interest,” Trump said. “Do you know how many conflicts of interests there are?”

>Trump fired Comey as head of the FBI investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election, as well as alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Moscow.

>Reports emerged last month that Trump was considering firing Mueller, drawing criticism from both Democrat and Republican lawmakers. The White House pushed back against those reports, saying Trump had “no intention” of firing the special counsel.

http://www.thehill.com/homenews/administration/342845-trump-warns-mueller-against-investigating-his-familys-finances-beyond
>>
Lmao
>>
I honestly wonder if he has Alzheimer's or something. It really is hard to understand how someone can act this dumb otherwise.
>>
>>159068
He's not dumb. He is doubling down constantly on purpose, because he WANTS a constitutional crisis that will determine whether he is subject to the rule of law or not.

He has no interest in playing the long game since once he is out of office he would no longer be in a position to capitalize on a victory against the rule of law and the creations of a Republican one party state.
>>
>>159043
Trump just doesn't want Mueller to waste his time since his finances are so extensive and there is nothing criminal or illicit to find in the first place.
>>
>>159088
It additionally opens up a bad precedent. Trump is under investigation for, at BEST, associative or circumstantial evidence for speculous connections that haven't really bore any fruit and noone legitimately thinks there's anything there at this point.

But the anti-Trump establishment now have full access to Trumps finances, his paperwork, etc. Now they can open doors they previously could not, and try to find dirt on him in other ways.
>>
>>159088
Are you shitting me nothing criminal or illicit his past finances. His finances are about as squeaky clean as the Clinton foundation ohh and btw there body count just went up a few days ago.
>>
>Trump also said Mueller’s office had several conflicts of interest,

Cauldron calling the kettle black
>>
>>159155
If you're wise and looking at this without taking sides, it's two entities battling it out without making it seem like a battle. The establishment vs Trump's administration
>>
>>159155

>mueller hires entire Clinton campaign team to investigate Trump
>b-but there's n-nothing wrong w-with that, n-nope, l-lulz drumpf!
>>
TRUMP WILL FIRE MUELLER THIS FRIDAY
I want you to quote this
>>
>>159180
>B-b-but the Clintons

Keep memeing you nutty memester
>>
>>159186
You don't think the Clintons should hang for their crimes?
>>
>>159186
>Everyone investigating me and my foundation keeps dying :(
- Hillary, probably
>>
>>159180
>mueller hires entire Clinton campaign team to investigate Trump
Fake news.
>>
What story are you cucks going to make up about Clinton when the video of Donald and his Russian hookers peeing all over him hits the main line?
>>
>>159198
Well hello there Mr Chris Cuomo. How are you doing Sir.
Glad to see you you on the "illegal alt right deep web" or whatever it is you guys call the internet outside of CNN.
>>
>>159198
>Leftist cuck anticipates actually proven fake story

Niggas retarded as fuck
>>
>>159088
>trust me I know for sure I just looked they are totally okay
>>
>>159226
If, and it most definitely will, it turns out Trump has zero ties to anything and is wholly innocent then this is just the opposition using this to snoop into Trump's personal information and open doors previously closed to them. It's a politcal game.
>>
>>159191
And this is why I come to 4 Chan ohh thank you for the laughs Anon
>>
>>159095
Kinda like it did with Reagan and Clinton? Getting boned by an investigation is a political reality sometimes. Both Reagan and Clinton kept public support throughout by working across the aisle on legislation. Trump is presiding over a good economy like Reagan and Clinton, but hasn't shown any interest in legislating or forming a cohesive foreign policy (outside of immigration and trade).

The point is that presidents who are capable can brush off the pr fallout from an all out media blitz like this. But Trump is an idiot, and it's becoming more apparent. Besides, there's plenty of propaganda pumping from right wing outlets as well as from the left wing ones. The media isn't hindering Trump's presidency, he is.
>>
>>159227
>most definitely will
Why the absolute certainty? Does Trump strike you as some paragon of the law? Being involved with russian money laundering wouldn't be wildly inconsistent with the way he's conducted himself over the years.
>>
>>159463
No other president has had to deal with what Trump has, and noone has managed to fuck the media/establishment as hard as he has.

If we were being 100% honest, we would equally dole out scrutiny over every politician. Clinton's and their dealings with Putin and their known inflow and outflow of dollars with countries like Russia, Oman, Suadi Arabia, the UAE, and Quatar to name a few - this got little to no attention by the media.

The media, the global political machine, the banks, the entertainment industry, and the academies are all headed by the same people, and run by their less knowledgeable pets. And you can cry conspiracy all you want, but it's apparent and obvious that a cabal of insiders is working behind the scenes to shape the world in their image, and Trump is in the way for now.
>>
>>159706
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_of_Vince_Foster
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkansas_Project
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitewater_controversy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewinsky_scandal
tl;dr The Clintons were being investigated for some shady shit, which led to some lady leaking the Lewinsky affair to the investigator. Clinton was later impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice.

The precedent has already been set - even the phrase "political witch-hunt":

>Clinton, however, saw otherwise. "President Clinton believed from the start that this was nothing but a political witch hunt," Gormley says. "In his mind, they were out to get him because they wanted a regime change and were willing to go for broke."
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123653000

Look, there's a lot of history out there. I understand becoming informed is difficult and time-consuming, but maybe do some research first? Just a little?
>>
>>159706
The investigations into Clinton very likely cost her a margin that could have won her the election. They cost her moderate voters that she would have won if she weren't such a crook, and they cost her disaffected progressive voters from the left. That's not quite jail. But those are very real consequences to her actions.

This is a logical progression of 16 years of war crimes committed and unanswered to since the beginning of the Bush administration.

And I do recall Trump apologists complaining that Obama instituted a similar travel ban, and precised over increased ICE activity.Trump and Obama actually have similar policy with regards to immigration in practice. I don't see where you're getting the idea that this globalization cabal which Obama is beholden to is somehow diametrically opposed to a guy doing the same thing.
>>
>>159711
>"Trump apologists"
As if he need to apologize for anything. Why are lefties so dense?
>>
>>159706
>noone has managed to fuck the media/establishment as hard as he has.

He literally hasn't dome anything tf

Oh wait he destroyed healthcare because his fee fees was hurt
>>
>>159730
How did he "destroy healthcare"?

You sound like your politcal stances are based on headlines of your fave left wing journals and r/all
>>
>>159731
http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/328572-trump-threatens-to-stop-key-obamacare-payments-report
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/19/donald-trump-end-payments-obamacare-subsidies-238616
Withholding subsidies would probably do it, although he has only made the threat to do so thus far.
>>
>>159730
You know, everyone can see you're an idiot by your use of the word literally. And your woman-like emotional exaggerations. "He destroyed healthcare." You're like a child who should've been told to sit down and shut up more when you actually were a child.
>>
Great to see that Trump apologists are resorting to shitting up threads with fever swamp conspiracies.

None of your diversionary tactics have any bearing on the inescapable reality that Mueller's investigation is getting into Trump's 30 year history of helping Russian oligarch's launder money, and Trump's hysterical reaction to this tells you how worried he is about it (and he should be).
>>
>>159706
>noone has managed to fuck the media/establishment as hard as he has.

> news ratings are setting records
> trump can't stop hiring wall street players who should be in jail instead of creating legislation for him to rubber stamp

Damn, I wish my enemies would try to fuck me like that.
>>
>>159771
>Obama litterally picked his cabinet using a list from Citibank
>Fox, brietbart, Infowars crush any left wing outlet by margins so high it's not even funny

Why are libs so bad at seeing the things they dislike are going on within their own party?
>>
>>159043

>you're hired to investigate Russian meddling
>I'd rather look into shit you did 15 years ago

He needs to shut this down immediately. The investigation was started by Obongo more than a year ago and we have, to date, zero evidence of Trump "colluding with Russia" (which, in and of itself, isn't even illegal.)
>>
>>159801
Do you remember what happened with Clinton? The majority of the public saw the impeachment as partisan overreach and the GOP took a hit in the midterms for it. If Trump's hands are truly squeaky clean, he should embrace the Mueller probe, because it can only exonerate him. Mueller's a longtime Republican with a universal reputation for integrity.

I'd also like to give you a daily reminder that when the Democrats finally fully embrace the far left, you'll only have yourself to blame. The more you say bullshit like "Obongo", the more the left will hate you and pivot towards socialism. We've seen that when the Democrats have control of congress and the presidency, they know how to legislate. The Republicans can't even agree on getting rid of something they all campaigned against when they control every branch of government. So when the left rams single payer through, and you're so angry you don't know what to do, maybe you should take a look in the mirror. Because you and your orange candidate will be the scapegoat that Democrats use to rally their base.
>>
>>159706
I haven't seen this much delusion in awhile.

Thanks anon.
>>
>>159801
The investigation hasn't concluded yet. They don't make an announcement for every piece of evidence they find, they wait until their investigation is done and then tell us what they find. Stop this "no evidence has been found by the investigation" bullshit. We don't know what they've found. If there was nothing to find you faggots wouldn't be trying so desperately to shut this down.
>>
>>159711
Obama was the Deporter-in-Chief. Trump is the Jailer-in-Chief. Deportations are down, incarceration is way up.

Do you know where those people go? Private prison complexes where they work 16 hours a day laboring away for zero pay. It's modern day slavery. Current attorney general Jeff Sessions is heavily invested right now in private prison companies.

It's not a coincidence.
>>
>>159774
Lol, Breitbart numbers are way down.

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/05/breitbart-coms-readership-numbers-are-plummeting-in-what-should-be-its-hour-of-triumph
>>
Why haven't Trump supporters seen the writing on the wall yet? Is it because they're embarrassed to admit they got conned? Watching from overseas, it's getting a little pathetic
>>
>>159860
Ditto to you lol
>>
>>159865
not surprising, they were a breath of fresh air when they were writing about point of views opposed to msm consensus but they got way to sensationalist and pandering for there own good
>>159866
mate you're the own getting conned into thinking the establishment politicians are a force for good as opposed to trump
>>
>>159750
Not an argument
>>
>>159880
I have an argument for you.

>greater all around healthcare coverage =/= better healthcare system
>Obamacare increased premiums by double to triple in most states
>Obamacare has reduced the number of providers in some states to 1 insurer!
>Obamacare has wrongfully forced people to dump their doctors and providers
>Obamacare has weakened the spending power of the middle class, especially large families
>Obamacare was written by the insurance companies, and has given preferential treatment to several companies

Also, Trump hasn't destroyed healthcare because nothing has even changed yet you dumbass
>>
>>159890
But Trump is a white male. He should be in prison for that alone.
>>
>>159890
A few things.
1.Obamacare has slowed the growth of premiums compared to its rate under W.
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/02/slower-premium-growth-under-obama/

2.Republicans have sabotaged the bill at the state level refusing medicaid expansion.
https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/resources/primers/medicaidmap

3. Insurance companies can no longer sell scam plans that don't offer a reasonable level of coverage

4. Of course insurance companies participated in the writing of the bill, they're central to its function. Obama unfortunately could not get the public option passed.
>>
>>159087
>Republican one party state
You mean we're going to put America First forever?


Oh happy day!
>>
>>159905
Please do tell me how exactly a one-party state is American or even democratic in any way, let alone good for the country.
>>
>>159903
1. That's bullshit, and factcheck sites are bullshit.

Premiums under Obamacare sore 22% on average in one year

http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/24/news/economy/obamacare-premiums/index.html

Overwhelming evidence Obamacare caused premiums to grow substantially

https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2016/07/28/overwhelming-evidence-that-obamacare-caused-premiums-to-increase-substantially/#4289710715be

2. Medicaid should not be expanded.

3. Insurance companies are now obligated to parse out full coverage instead of people being able to pick and choose, craft their own plans based on what they deem necessary.

4. SPECIFIC insurance companies wrote the bill, to help THEM specifically (crony capitalism)
>>
>>159915
>factcheck
>money.cnn.com
Are you actually retarded?
>>
>>159924
>Factcheck

I used CNN and Forbes so lefties can't use "muh Breitbart"

Factcheck is legitimately trash, as is mediabias and snopes.
>>
>>159926
Jesus Christ. CNN literally had to fire 3 guys last week because their reporting is so shit and unreliable they got sued for 100 million. And you still use them?
>>
>>159928
Jesus. Use the Forbes link then
>>
>>159928
That's what a legitimate news agency does. If something retarded happens, they fire those involved and tighten up their standards. When the fuck has Fox or any other right-leaning shit-flinging outpost done the same? Your right-wing propaganda stations double down on acting like complete fucking retards, all the while you brainless fucking simpletons scream "FAKE NEWS" any time a legitimate organization improves itself. Really instigates those cashews.
Thread posts: 55
Thread images: 1


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.