http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/rambling-reporter/youtube-pulls-controversial-music-video-graphic-gay-sex-racked-up-700000-views-973
>>110069
Things may be changing. Leftism has peaked.
Hopefully we get 50 years of sanity, before we forget what the left's goals are again.
>>110070
Yeah but Vimeo still has it up and even approved it. The fuckers who created it even set up a website to keep it up. It needs to be shut down.
>>110075
Delete your existence.
>>110075
You think it's good for porn to be on youtube.
Ok. Fuck off though.
>>110074
No it doesnt you freedom hating moron.
They can host it online. Just not youtube where every kid watches videos.
>>110079
Freedom is not synonymous with debauchery.
>>110078
I dont believe that porn should be youtube. I believe art should be on youtube whatever that may be whether its gay or not, shocking or not it has its place
>>110082
It wasn't the fact that it depicted homosexuality but that it had scat and other fetishes.
>>110079
It has an above 18+ rating so thats the parents choice to view the video
>>110083
What is wrong with depicting fetishes to 18+ yos? Arent they adults? Do they not have the capacity to deal with seeing different fetishes?
>>110083
So why cant they depict different sexual fetishes to adults?
>>110088
I never said that this should be shown to children only to adults as indicated by the 18+ rating
>>110076
>Someone has different opinion than me waaah
Grow up
>>110091
>it doesnt have a place anywhere on the internet
Ok but stuff like childporn and necrophilia exist on the internet but stuff like cant exist either? This isnt even porn this is just showing different fetishes and not even in a sexual way sure you can say the same thing about all the worse stuff but that stuff is morally wrong. This about consenting grown men engaging in sexual activities in an artful way not smut.
>>110093
The 18+ rating is all we have to you prefer everyone to just be censored and not be able to depict anything controversial?
>>110093
It promotes immoral, unhealthy, if not illegal behavior such as urinating and defecating on other people to sexually arouse viewers. That this is being dismissed as an issue of freedom of expression baffles me.
>>110096
Youtube is not for sex videos. Stop arguing otherwise.
>>110097
I still dont see the problem with two grown consenting adults doing this as immoral, im sure if they knew what they were doing theyd clean up after its considered healthy unless someone is ill then they would not do it in the first place. And finally it is not illegal with consenting grown adults.
>>110097
>That this is being dismissed as an issue of freedom of expression baffles me.
I understand it baffles you. That's because your culture does not value individual liberty.
To us, the individual is everything.
>>110098
Its not a sex video its art we already went through this
>>110100
And why is fighting against this sort of material an attack on individual liberty?
>>110102
Becausing you are muting someone for the sake of censorship and that is no good!
>>110106
>Are you really trying to argue against liberty?
I never did.
>>110108
It's alarming that you don't even realize what you're agruing for.
Kinda like leftists advocating "tolerance," not realizing its communism.
You would argue for "morality," but the end is just more communism.
Even the supposed right-wingers from Europe are basically leftists. You would be totally fucked if not for America.
>>110106
You're a faggot
>>110110
I don't see being against debauchery as the same thing as attacking the individual liberty of other citizens.
>>110112
That's because you don't understand liberty and you never will.
or
if you don't like something you can just, y'know, not watch it
you are the people inserting the words "muh freedom" into every sentence
it must be hard to be so hypocritical
>>110116
The problem doesn't go away just because you choose to ignore it.
>>110118
It doesn't need to "go away" you commie idiot.
Youtube took it down because thats where little kids watch videos. Smart decision by a business.
>>110093
>The 18+ rating is bullshit.
>Should they have hardcore porn, so long as you have to click "im 18"? Of course not.
Literally why have any porn at all if kids can just click the 'I am 18' button?
Put effort into your shit post, this is /news/, not /b/ or /pol/
>>110123
Your virtue signaling is pathetic.
What are you even trying to say?
>>110124
I think he said, "If its so easy for kids to bypass the 18+ filter, then you wanna ban all porn right???"
That's the closest thing to a point I can put together from that attempt at communicating.
What you forgot is not everyone is a leftist who thinks the government needs to allow things to exist.
>>110124
That's not even what I'm doing.
The 'but muh kids' is a pretty shit tier argument. Like, what kid is going to stumble into obscene art porn on YouTube. That should be being channeled away from him because algorithms should be diverting the kid watching Minecraft vids away from that sort of content.
And if you're the kind of person whose worried about the moral fabric of society being challenged by obscures YouTube videos then just fuck off, you're the kind of person who won't be pleased till all porn on the internet is erased.
Or you're a hypocrite for not constantly scouring YouTube itself for inappropriate content to report. I mean if there's this one gay video, how many more could their be? Or is this just elevated to your face and you'll stop caring about this kind of shit once the video is dropped?
I mean it's not like you chucklefucks found it the same day it was posted.
Again, put some effort into it.
>>110126
Not every inappropriate video is being actively recommended and promoted by YouTube. And stuff like this is in violation of US obscenity laws.
>>110126
>That's not even what I'm doing
You are obviously trying to give your post credibility by acting like youre from here.
And now we've got a long winded paragraph with no discernable argument.
Classic leftism. Yes I actually did read your post and its garbage. Like usual, you misunderstand the issue and attack.
>>110069
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLNlsNMQgjQ
>MEMEME! gets taken down, but reposts of the orginal are allowed.
>But porn is literally allowed on Youtube.
Google is so inconsistent with rules.
I would be fine with the video being on Youtube if the site allowed non ''artistic'' porn. Until they change that, keep this filth of the website.
>>110132
Its uncanny how often leftists respond with the same exact insult that was just used on them.
Unable to form distinctions, they cannot properly criticize.
Their best form of debate and insult relies on manipulating emotion and peer acceptance.
But as they sink further into their philosophy of non-judgement, they lose their understanding of people and their manipulation skills suffer.
This is the end, and its beautiful.
>>110142
lookout boys, we got ourselves a moral policeman here on a high horse.
These cancerous faggots deserve to be put in jail for producing and distributing this filth.
>>110144
Exposing the inner workings of the leftist "mind" is a moral act, you say?
I agree. You must be exposed.
>>110142
But wait, i thought the right was all about manipulation and bandwaggoning. Why else would racist assholes combine into a huge circle jerk if nothing but to validate each others insecurities
>>110144
Notice the leftists insult relies on casting me as an "outsider."
He is from a place where subjectivism (no morals) is the norm. So he thinks calling me a moral fag is a great insult.
Its a simplistic mind. We overestimate them. This is the best they've got, aside from violence.
>>110149
>misunderstand
>attack
This is the basic 2-step debate tactic they rely on. It is quite uncanny how they speak this way.
Even when replying to this post, he will likely do it again. It is a trained response, like salivation at the mouth.
>>110151
I want the /pol/ posts to stop
Could you contribute to the thread instead of attacking a political party?
Observe that even when the leftist's simplistic tactics are exposed and mocked, they can do nothing to stop themselves.
>>110129
>And now we've got a long winded paragraph with no discernable argument.
>>110132
>Top unconstructive post, anon. With no actial argument to boot!
>>110142
>Its uncanny how often leftists respond with the same exact insult that was just used on them.
>Their best form of debate and insult relies on manipulating emotion
>>110149
>i thought the right was all about manipulation
It's kinda sad. How can you be so predictable?
>>110156
Is that you, OP?
Don't come to a new board talking shit. This thread is mine now.
>>110159
No, I am OP and I'm against regressives and SJW cucks. Keep it up.
>>110163
Nice virtue signaling. You really convinced me you're a part of the group.
>this us yet another attempt at "out-grouping"
This is the leftists preferred method of insult. As I stated here>>110151
But you did it anyway, lol.
>>110164
>I can't imagine what it's like to be a partisan fanatic
There's the misunderstanding.
>Do you wake up in the morning feeling persecuted
And the attack.
EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
Guess it didn't take long for the alt-right cucks to turn into SJWs after being around them so long.
>>110181
False equivalence. And the alt-right doesn't exist.
>>110183
Whatever you say snowflake.
>>110184
Right, I'm a snowflake because I decide to uphold the law. Nice logic you got there.
>>110170
>Nice virtue signaling
I don't think this means what you think it means
>>110185
Censorship has no business anywhere. If you paid attention to gamergate you'd know that.
>>110187
The authors of the video committed a crime. Are you going to defend burglars too because the law censors and oppresses them?
>>110188
No, because that's not the same at all. Just because murder is illegal doesn't mean you can't act it out with consenting adults. Put up a warning to keep the soccer moms in check and you're good. I don't like the content of the video, but I rather my anime tiddies be left alone.
>>110193
>but I rather my anime tiddies be left alone
And they are. We're talking about a filmed combination of homosexuality with depravities such as defecating on another man being sold as art on a kid-friendly video streaming service.
>>110195
But there are anime tiddies on youtube. I can find stuff way worse than this video too.
You were the guy who was honest if a site asked if you were 18, weren't you?
>>110196
>But there are anime tiddies on youtube.
Those are hardly an issue.
>You were the guy who was honest if a site asked if you were 18, weren't you?
Not really. But I never sought out this garbage either. And I'm not going to be happy when they try to shove it in my face.
>>110195
What's illegal about that again?
>>110198
>Those are hardly an issue.
Apparently they are. SJWs love "think of the children!!!" just as much.
If you're worried about kids stumbling upon stuff like this on youtube, then you're gonna have to count everything like this.
>>110200
Are you seriously comparing the sexual display of breasts to that of scat and piss?
>>110202
Youtube is a kid friendly platform so that shouldn't be there anon! G and E rated content only!
>>110205
>using SJW tactics
nice, is the tantrum phase next?
>>110204
I'm not saying that porn should be on YouTube. But the arousal caused by a proportional pair of breasts in a qt3.14 /fit/ girl is natural and normal.
>>110207
Ah, at the "censorship is fine as long as I agree with it!" part now. Your almonds are activating.
>>110213
Just because the adults consent, it doesn't mean we should endorse or support them.
>>110206
Keep virtue signaling guy its really effective. I'm almost convinced you aren't a leftist shill. Maybe use a few more buzzwords.
I said it before and I'll say it again.
>anons on 4chan
>crying for censorship
A
C
A
N
C
E
R
I
S
F
I
N
E
T
O
O
>>110218
But nothing unworthy of repulsion was censored.
>>110230
Bitch if you can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
>>110069
I never read the article, but I imagine it has to do with two or more sick, twisted, perverted exhibitionists: masturbating on each other.
>>110235
If only. It's a bunch of disgusting queers promoting depravities and calling it art.
>>110069
It's their site, Youtube, they can do what they want. Who fucking cares? And who cares that it's hosted elsewhere?
>>110095
It's smut to those who like those kinks. Don't even use the art bullshit excuse. Porn is Porn, especially if it's fetish porn. If YouTube doesn't want Fetish art on the website then they have a right to take it down.
I know because I have fetishes. I'm not going to fucking be a retard about it either and say that its normal.
>ctrl+f virtue signaling
>6 results
jesus dude, I know it's in the /pol/ playbook for things to say when you are arguing but i think you might be jumping at ghosts a bit
>>110471
Words have meaning. If you virtue-signal, you're going to get called out on it.
I know this must be confusing to you. Here we think objectively.
>>110478
>words have meaning
>here we think objectively
kek
>>110479
more virtue-signaling
great
*bored face*
>>110489
>words have meaning
there was nothing wrong with this video.
It's interesting that /pol/, the board that wants to shout nigger in public, wanted to censor something imo.
Rightwinger arguments
>call someone a leftist
>talk about inane bullshit that relates to the post they're refuting in the absolute vaguest way possible
>act superior and intellectual to seem more authoritative despite having provided nothing in the way of discussion, debate, or argument
>talk about how nice it will be when leftists all die/disappear/hang themselves
>throw some subtle (or not so subtle) ad hominems in the mix
>post
>>110503
I already told you it doesn't work on republicans.
for reference
Leftist arguments (in 2-steps)
Step 1
>misunderstand
Step 2
>attack
We often note that leftists argue only with strawmen. We assume this is intentional, but that is giving the leftist too much credit. Yes they are trained to debate this way, but the cause is deeper.
They have a philosophy, taught from kindergarten and on, that rejects discrimination. Because of this, they cannot understand anything objectively.
Observe how often the leftist cannot avoid this 2 step process, even when they are aware of it.
There are other characteristics they share (like their preferred method of insult) but essentially every argument they attempt is a foundation misunderstanding followed by a personal attack.
Note that this poster has relied on the leftists favorite insult, "no you." A lack of originality is an unfortunate side-effect of their philosophy.
>>110495
>virtue signalling
he said it again, the absolute madman
>>110550
If you keep virtue-signaling, I will continue to call it out.
>the absolute madman
memes are often used a virtue-signals. Let me guess, I'm supposed to think you're less of a faggot now?
>>110561
>ctrl+f virtue signaling
13 results now
kek
>>110567
Classic leftism. Anyone who notices something has committed the SIN of discrimination.
>>110572
or maybe you are just crying virtue signaling without addressing the content of anon's posts, so your classic anti-left bollocks is being mocked?
>>110584
maybe you're a virtue signaling leftist propagandist who's growing weary of getting btfo
>>110607
Nobody but us leftists here.
>>110607
or maybe i was never virtue signalling in the first place?
>>110515
By those standards everyone posting on 4chan is a leftist
>>110616
Of course, even I do that sometimes. Most of us went to public school.
The difference is that progressives do it without fail.
>librrruls did everything bad
Can this meme go back to >>>/pol/?
one word: No.
Period.
>>110625
It's all they've got, don't take it away from them
Nice work right-wing SJW!
>>110827
>come into thread
>see some shut-in freaking out about fuck knows what
this is exactly the sort of shit i come here for, 10/10 post
>>110827
If getting called out on your leftist propaganda bothers you so much, maybe you should stop trying to destroy civilization.
that video gave me aids
Going on 4chan to argue for censorship has to be the edgiest bullshit imaginable
Censor the horrible gays, but leave my anime guro alone!
I'm guessing OP is some form of nationalist authoritarian "traditionalist." Newsflash: your traditions are dead. Gone. Finito.
Dead!
And I'm glad that they're in the dustbin of history. All traditions that are anti-freedom must be destroyed.
>>111755
Also, here's something to chew on:
Probably no one in this thread had even heard of this video until you mentioned it and argued for its censorship.
Google "streisand effect" sometime and see how the Internet is making censorship impossible. You can't win.
>>111755
Its all the migrants from Reddit who won't go back. This site is dead. Its now where edgy redditors come to complain
>>111777
Le check meh kek dubbies meme
>https://www.youtube.com/yt/policyandsafety/communityguidelines.html
>Nudity or sexual content
>YouTube is not for pornography or sexually explicit content. If this describes your video, even if it's a video of yourself, don't post it on YouTube. Also, be advised that we work closely with law enforcement and we report child exploitation.
>Youtube takes down video of hardcore gay sex
>Somehow this is news to people
>>110069
>MEMEME!
Don't treat people as if their disposable.
>House of air
I wanna be famous so I'm going to capitalize on shocking sex stuff.
Art isn't cancer, idiots are.
>>110218
>a company should be forced to allow others to do what they want
Sounds like freedom huh
I imagine you also wanted that baker to bake a cake for that gay couple too?