Wow! Just had the pleasure of seeing Starcross Station. It's a train station where erosion has removed any gap between it and the sea, leaving it exactly on the side of the sea. Unfortunately I'm in a car and not a train, still would like to take a train near it.
Very pretty sight though.
So the station will be kill in a few decades?
>>1097760
The station already was kill a couple of years ago, the land underneath it was completely washed away and the rails were just hanging in mid-air.
All been fixed up now with a proper sea-wall...EVEN THOUGH THERE'S LIKE THREE INLAND RAIL ROUTES THAT THEY COULD REOPEN SO THIS DOESN'T ENTIRELY CUT OFF THE SOUTH-WEST AGAIN BUT APPARENTLY THAT'S NOT COST-EFFECTIVE OR SOMETHING
>>1097853
Tsk, you'll be wanting electrification next!
>>1097904
Full electrification from London to Cardiff, when?
"Indefinitely deferred" I believe was the expression.
>>1097904
KeK
All good fun.
>>1097909
It would be pointless electrifying past Exeter on the Devon line because the knitting will be down along Dawlish etc every time the wind gets above a gentle breeze, as on the ECML near the coast.
>>1100889
as much as i hate it (living in plym) this anon is right.
i love the route on the coast near dawlish but fuck me is it prone to storms and inclement weather.
it would be cheaper to build a breakwater along that stretch of coast than keep repairing the railway after every storm, i reckon, but NR would never shell out for it.
>>1100889
One of the reasons for that is because the catenary Poles are ridiculously far apart due to cost cutting during electrification