http://www.santafenewmexican.com/ne ws/local_news/after-bike

Our political campaigns would be vastly improved if they were always done by bicycle.

Johnson is a pretty cool guy, I would vote for him except
>“Those Libertarians, man, I just can’t trust them,” Cliver said. “They just put too much trust in the free market.”
is exactly how I feel too.

File: gary-johnson.jpg (109KB, 338x500px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 338x500px

>>1018534
I don't agree with them on a lot of things, but as a Proudhonian Mutualist my other option is just not voting

>>1018543
Mutualism is retarded.

>lets give people private property spooks, but they can only have the same amount of capital and cant accumulate capital, but we do this without the regulation of the state

It's just as meme utopian as ancap and ancom.

There's no reason to not just be a socialist unless you fell for the socialism means centrally planned economy meme. Mutualism isn't some form of miracle synthesis of capitalism and communism. It's just socialism without the social mechanism to enforce itself.

Also

>Aleppo

File: gary.jpg (18KB, 236x211px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 236x211px

I'm cool with ancoms, ancaps, egoists, agorists, individualists, libertarians... anything that reduces the boots on my neck.

>>1018549
>implying the only boots are the boots of a democratically elected government
There are worse boots to be at your neck.

>>1018549
Go live in the jungle then

Fuck

Don't people realize governments evolved and formed for a reason

>>1018555
Just because that's true doesn't mean I can't vote to reduce the government some

>>1018546
Many traditional societies have managed to maintain social customs without a state, just through social pressure.

>>1018530
First of all it's all downhill from Taos to SF. I'd be mildly impressed if went the other way and then held a news conference.

Secondly, have you guys actually watched some of teevee interviews and appearances? He seems like kind of an idiot. I mean, really not so smart. He's not even able to speak in any detail about his own central policies.