I think I figured the most perfect, most balanced rating system

>>75067246
The descriptions of your 5, 4.5, 4, and even 3.5 sounds like what I would rate as a 5. Try again.

>>75067268
yes

File: Red.jpg (38KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 1000x1000px

>>75067246
5.0 - Useless rating
4.5 - Favorites
4.0 - Amazing
3.5 - Great
3.0 - Good
2.5 - Par
2.0 - Useless rating
1.5 - Useless rating
1.0 - Bad
0.5 - Apathy (most music fits here)

>>75069209
5.0 - Favorites
4.5 - Amazing
4.0 - Great
3.5 - Good
3.0 - Could be better
2.5 - Indifferent
2.0 - Useless rating
1.5 - Useless rating
1.0 - Useless rating
0.5 - Awful

5 – favorite
4.5 – masterpiece
4 – essential
3.5 – recommended
3 – remarkable
2.5 – unremarkable
2 – not recommended
1.5 – bad
1 – awful
0.5 – unlistenable

5.0
god tier

4.5
masterpiece

4.0
awesome

3.5
good

3.0
average

2.5
disappointment

2.0
bad

1.5
very bad

1.0
aberration

0.5
trash


bad, very bad and aberration are for bad hiphop/rap, good meme music or bad music in general
trash is mainly for nazi and homophobic music, bad gangsta rap and youtubecore

File: 1488116180266.gif (2MB, 395x313px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 395x313px

Why do people fight the bell curve? I'll never understand it. RYM helps the most retarded of users making the ratings different shades of green and red.

>>75071550
they don't understand how arithmetic mean works

this is the worst case >>75069209 because he doesn't use 5.0. fuking snowflake

>>75067246
baka
>not using a positive rating model
don't you want to show your favourites bro? patrician rating system incoming

5 Perfection (no recorded music can achieve this rating)
4.5 Incredible (a free improv album I have listened to once and only once)
4.0 Awesome
3.5 Fantastic
3.0 Remarkable (put some of my actual favourites here so they are buried and nobody pays attention to them and thinks I am a pleb)
2.5 Wonderful
2.0 Outstanding
1.5 Incredible
1.0 Amazing
0.5 99% of all recorded music (may or may not have actually listened to these)