Is it true that big record companies fill their tracks with subliminal

>>74829601
Perfection isn't when there is nothing more to add, it's when there's nothing left to take away.

>>74829601
someone's been watching john todd videos on youtube

partially i think, most music is produced by two megacorps, which leads to pop music all sounding very similar these days

here is an example of this phenomenon;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MN23lFKfpck

>>74829601
there's overdubbing and very quiet tracks, but there's not a single uniform sound they jam in all their songs

File: a5b64fe31abd2511134e9eabbc9ca3a8.jpg (43KB, 500x549px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 500x549px

>>74829678
Damn, really makes u think

>>74829601
SHUT
IT
DOWN

nah they just have equipment regular people can't afford.

The tracks are just autistically maximized.

>>74829601

Yes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7hJNLoPdoE

Good question, but I think the truth is that there's just production tools which make things sound better.
I wouldn't know though, all my songs suck.

>>74832032
This isn't really an example of what OP is saying

>>74829601
No. They just have the best people in the world working on music. Like, the best equipment, technicians, studios, more time is put into the tracks. The producers have mastered he art of creating earworms, look at how many no. 1 hits Max Martin alone has.

No, the difference is professional mixing, and even more so.. Mastering, most amateur recordings are not properly mastered for two reasons... 1) It's not the same as mixing and requires very good ears and monitoring 2)It can be expensive to have it done.