Agree or disagree? >https://www.spin.com/2017/08/drunk -j

It's not Thicke's fault, but that copyright trial set a dangerous precedent and one not backed up by any legal definitions of plagiarism

unless my memory fails, i remember QOTSA doing a cover of "blurred lines" a few years back

>>74747054
You don't think its total vanity to insist that the tiniest similarity is your sole property and entitles you to a payout?

>>74747095
A cover is different because you always give writing credit and call it a cover. He's talling about when people "lift" a similar melody or line

>>74747017
Imma need that sauce here, fine gentleman

>>74747340
bumpy

Nudes share-site archive if you aren't in the know you don't need to know (rhymes with mexas)