Just listened to this last night. Is the rest of their discography worth listening to if I liked this?
>>74712131
yes because that's one of their weaker albums tbqh
Listen to the rest of the first 5 albums in chronological order now
>>74712131
yes, all of their albums are enjoyable
(even the first kid's album but that might be more from me listening to it back as a kid myself)
their newer stuff is a lot cleaner and more processed than their older stuff, some of their songs feel a lot more sterile too, I haven't listened to whatever came out after nanobots but definitely follow up on them
O yeah. Flood is maybe my 3rd fav of theirs, a good but mixed bag for me. My friend is a huge TMBG fan and Flood is his favorite, though, maybe partly b/c nostalgia
My favorites are their first two. I recommend getting the "Then: The Earlier Years" double album collection
First album is amazing imo, not really any filler, just one successful experiment after the other, though it might take a little for the whole thing to grow on you. Second album has some of my favorite songs but it's also got a few that I don't care for.
I also recommend Apollo 18, Nanobots, and Severe Tire Damage after those.
Yeah, they stayed pretty consistent throughout their career. Their first round of albums ('They Might Be Giants' to 'No!') are all excellent.
It's a crime that they never did anything for Yo Gabba Gabba.
The show was perfect for them.
I'm a big fan of their first three albums. Wasn't as impressed by Apollo 18, haven't listened to anything after that.
>>74713619
Yo Gabba Gabba is almost pitchfork for kids.
I'm glad they know how to turn kids into patricians