Discuss http://pitchfork.com/news/announcin g-pitchforks-200

>>74684065
I thought they said they weren't going to make this, considering half of 60s was still "singles era".

fuck off p4kdrone

>>74684065
probably just gonna do something boring like calling pet sounds the best of the 1960s despite giving it like a 7.5 ages ago
trout mask replica will probably make it to top 20 or 30 or something
man pitchfork is retarded

>>74684088
"When is Pitchfork gonna run a list of the top albums of the 1960s?" The answer now? Probably never. Not that we didn't consider it. It's just that when we sat down to map it all out, we found it would be more rewarding to approach the decade through its songs instead. After all, it was by and large a single-oriented era-- the long-player didn't really take over as a creative medium until the 60s had nearly come to an end. And besides, Revolver 's ego is out of hand as it is."

>>74684118
This is a music board, and Pitchfork, a prominent music publication is putting out a big piece. I think it's strange you wouldn't want a thread about it, even if you disagree with most of it.