Why doesn't scaruffi like Bish Bosch?? Like it is certainly something he should objectively like
6 means he likes it
>>74646169
nah it doesn't
>>74646169
this
are you new to scaruffi OP
as contrarian and autistic as scaruffi is, one thing that's really good about him is he actually uses a 1-10 scale properly. if he rates something a 6 that means he likes and repsects it. a 7 means he thinks it's truly great. 8 means masterpiece, and 9 means one of the goats.
it's not like pitchfork/rollingstone/IGN who have inflated their scales to where anything less than 8 = mediocre shit
>>74646169
This.
Scaruffi has never even given out a 10, so you can safely add 1 to all his scores (unless you consider his 9.5 as 10, that is). And he actually uses a 1/10 scale, not a 6/10 like most reviewers.
>>74646177
>>74646196
>>74646208
what I mean is that he should consider it one of his goats based on how he reviews music
>>74646077
I've only heard a couple tracks but it seems too refined and well-constructed and with not enough of an ego-tripping personality. Like, it's unique but it still lacks a strong ego-tripping personality and, in a weird way, the music doesn't sound like the music of a neurotic failure, unlike all of his other goats.
>>74647640
>Neurotic failure
You've perfectly described Tilt and the Drift. Kollaps by Einstürzende Neubauten is one of the only albums I've heard that fits that description too.
>>74646426
you're still new then
Scaruffi only gives something points if it's never been done before. BB is odd but not original in its ideas.
>>74646077
because scaruffi likes well composed music, not just lol so random music, it just so happens that normies like you think that scott walker and beefheart are similar.
>>74647876
>Scaruffi only gives something points if it's never been done before
So why is Morphine's "Good" in his top 20? Also, i'm genuinely curious, what other album sounds like BB?
>>74646077
>rates Scott 4 higher than 3