There isn't any album that is not accessible. Anyone can

>>74544941
in this thread a thesis is put forward that collections of songs are not by definition inaccessible and therefore can be appreciated given enough time and effort. Users are welcome to discuss this statement.

File: 687474703a2f2f33382e6d656469612e74756d626c722e636f6d2f65656236303337653466653533363036386566356239663962383461643532642f74756d626c725f6e3532703735696a717431716a6a6b37736f315f3530302e6a7067.jpg (71KB, 500x377px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 500x377px

>>74544954

>>74544954
haha EPIC!!!

it's basically your openness - the degree to which the music is outside of what you are accustomed to = how "accessible" it is for you

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Openness_to_experience

I agree that even if an album is very not "accessible" for you you can still eventually appreciate it, as long as your openness isn't too low

Somewhat related, but who the fuck makes these pictures and for what purpose lol

>>74544941
not accessible doesn't mean that it's not possible to enjoy regardless of how much effort you put in, in means it's more difficult to get your head round and will probably take longer to really appreciate what's going on
the more accessible it is the quicker it will click

>>74545024
hey you're right i never thought about it that way. do people really buy stock photos for their weird fetishes or some thing?

>>74544941
op is confirmed to be fucking retarded and illiterate

wat

>>74544954
This is some reddit tier shit

Except Buyer's Market. Or Venereology.