So this isn't a "review" as much as it is a summary of the artist's life and a series of excuses to explain why this bad album isn't the artist's fault.
Why doesn't P4K just do this for every artist instead of ever writing a negative review?
>>74488643
Because negative reviews can be fun to write/read
>>74488643
they're busy pushing this idiot's rape agenda, so they're kind or whatever.
Reminder p4k is an Israeli propaganda agency.
>>74488643
>getting this mad over a review of a kesha album
Why do you fuckers give a shit about pitchfork so much? Stop being so butt-blasted. It literally doesn't matter.
>>74488696
>rape agenda
haha what the fuck are you talking about you fucking moron.
>>74488643
Can't even get the 1st sentence finished with a mention of Luke lol.
>>74488727
She was raped by Dr Luke. He made her sign contracts, and not let her make any music. That's rape. That is rape.
the funny thing is this her first album has a much better rating on p4k
Thoughts?
I read the review and I literally have no clue what the album sounds like or if it's decent.
Pitchfork is shit
Kesha is shit
May as well delete this thread and never mention those two again :)
>>74489411
>>74488643
Apparently showing butt on the cover gives you 2 bonus points
>>74488723
like pitchfork doesn't have some ridiculous rape story every week.
but (((you))) know this.
>>74489411
haven't listened to it yet, is it more hot garbage like the singles from her first album?
>>74489757
warrior was actually pretty good. her and dr.luke made some legit bangers
sad it had to end