Would this be more appreciated if Radiohead fans were not autistic

>>74480397
That's the most retarded question I've heard all day, and I teach retarded people for a living.

>>74480397
yes. Radiohead fans basically want OK Computer or In Rainbows all over again.

>>74480397
It would be appreciated less if not by Radiohead. It's a boring as fuck album that would go by completely unnoticed.

Do you think TKOL is deliberately a bad album?

>>74481209
t. butt mad radiohead fag

Maybe if another band had made it but no one would say it's as good as a Radiohead album in that instance. I like the album and all but it does feel a bit rushed compared to their usual work in spite of its more ambitious tendencies.

This album a banger

take the handful of tracks i like, delete the rest. just like all the rest. radiohead don't make albums, they are more like electronic music with some tracks. then they throw a few on for people who like their old music.

>>74481702
Imagine being this clueless

it's a beautiful thing being clueless

>>74480397
If it weren't radiohead it would get like, a 7.0, from p4k and be put on some math rock chart and forgotten indefinitely.

File: thom_yorke___the_eraser.png (51KB, 580x270px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 580x270px

>>74480397
Should have been a Thom Yorke solo album.
Same drum machine style:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJhmKF4npMs

>>74482195
>math rock
Did you even think about what you were saying?