What does /mu/ think of this album? People always talk about

>>74447252
kys

>>74447252
it's alright

>>74447252
I didn't like it at first listen, now I love it. Don't even know why, but to me it sounds like something made by a shut-in from the future and it's really cool

>>74447252
She used to do a lot of Speed

>>74447252
It's a nice album. You can tell it has been made in GarageBand but it doesn't matter when the songs are so out there and enjoyable. My favorites are Rosa, Venus in Fleurs, Caladan, Grisgris, Zoal Face Dancer. The latest 2 songs are the saddest songs in her discography.
Geidi Primes is doomed to remain underrated forever. Did you try her newer albums too?

>>74447434
dumb grimesfag

Art Angles sounds like pure mental illness

>>74447434
I've listened to Art Angels like twice, I haven't gotten into the whole Grimes trend because /mu/ has kinda ruined her for me. I think I should try out the others too.

>>74447459
Megalomania

>>74447475
Try Halfaxa and Visions. They're like refined versions of Geidi Primes and they're fucking great. BTW don't let /mu/ ruin the enjoyment you get from your favorite music.

>>74447252
It's the coziest-sounding of her albums imo. Very enjoyable listening on a slow day.

>>74447397
Adderall =/= speed dear. Learn your drugs.

>>74447516
Friends

>>74447662
What about that time she did copious amounts of amphetamine and pridefully revealed that in interviews

>>74447709
Hipster kids read about that and ruined their lives with hard drugs

>>74447709
wtf i hate claire now

>>74447746
Oh yeah well i post on SA forums

>>74447651
Thanks anon, will do.

>>74447709
>pridefully revealed
You interpret people being honest about things very strangely desu.

>>74448125
Why do you talk like a robot? What are you so afraid of?

>>74448298
Afraid of being a failed musician. Oh wait...

Does she ever play anything off this album live? I saw her do a 20 minute set so I figured that's possibly why she didn't but a live Rosa would be pretty awesome.

>>74448323
You're getting boring anon

>>74448359
Truth hurts, buddy.

>>74448323
Is there ever a conversation that you don't feel the need to bring up your professional background in?

>>74448474
What did you expect from someone so pretentious that he calls himself one of the biggest assholes on the internet?

(sauce: https://rbt.asia/mu/thread/73787890/#73808332)

>>74448474
Lol you're responding to someone else...

>>74447252
Her best release. It sounds like I'm exploring a huge cave in space n shiet

>>74448569
But I AM (or at least can be, if I feel like it) one of the biggest assholes on the internet desu...

>>74448602
Oh, so you're also the same guy that adds desu to the end of your posts where they don't really fit or are necessary.

>>74448619
Maybe he writes t b h

>>74448619
Only sometimes desu - like when I'm actually writing t b h. How new to 4chan are you?

>>74448676
>How new to 4chan are you?
Desu that word filter was added only last year or so

>>74448676
I know that you're writing t b h, and there's no point for that either. There's no addition to your post by adding "to be honest", it just corrected in my post when I wrote it.

she wasn't just a meme for a minute there

>he still didn't answer why he talks like a robot

>>74448714
>There's no addition to your post by adding "to be honest"
see
>>74448125
Are you some sort of AI that isn't very smart?

>>74448765
What the fuck are you talking about? Adding "to be honest" at the end of your post adds as much content as a teenage girl sandwiching "like" between words.

>>74448765
>said by someone who got accused of sounding like a robot post after that
Find some original insults.

>>74448802
Using vocalized pauses like the word 'like' IN BETWEEN words/phrases WITHIN sentences is completely different from using adverbial disjunctive phrases indicative of the author's emotional attitude towards the content expressed like 'to be honest' at the ENDS of sentences. Did you go to public school?

>>74448829
>Find some original insults.
It wasn't meant to be an insult. Why are you saying things in new posts that can be directly responded to by previous posts?

>>74448939
It loses its appeal if you overuse it. Is it so important to point out in 80% of your posts that you are being honest? I have much better education than you, thanks for asking.

>>74449014
So it was supposed to be a Turing test? Also, different anon

desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu

grimes sucks desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu

>>74448602
what's said about you and these grimes threads is that all these threads are made by the dude who makes the music theory/classical music threads. i'm very disappointed in you because i really like your other music threads and you come across as an intelligent guy and you really helped me in the past improving my songwriting.

you gave yourself up in the last grimes thread you made. i know the only reason you are making these threads is to troll /mu/ and get a lot of posts and views to entertain yourself. i know that YOU are the only "grimesfag" on here. which is sad, because i know you are not a grimesfag.

grimesfags do not exist on /mu/ or anywhere from what i am seeing.

(cont.)

AnonymousSat 29 Jul 2017 02:34:29No.74216806

Quoted By:>>74222665

>>74216701
(cont.)

i saw in the other grimesfag thread that you play several "characters" in these threads. you were using a tripcode and revealed yourself in several posts. you play as the dumb pajeet guy who can't speak english, the obsessed dude who posts the grimes copypasta, the "she's cute" guy, you are all of them.

you are clearly using publicly available wifi, which allows for you to log in and out of the wifi to obtain a new ip address so that it appears that multiple people are posting. you just randomly grab grimes numerous (and i mean numerous) publicity photos off of google images and post with the sole purpose of bumping the thread.

i figured it out because i know your writing style. you help me alot in the music theory threads and i know how you write because you are always giving me pointers.

i've seen you trashing grimes in both the /grimes/ threads that you make and a few others.

i'm just saying i find this funny but if i don't have any real grimes fans to hate on here, why even bother?

keep doing what you are doing i just want you to know that i am disappointed in you.

>>74449028
>Is it so important to point out in 80% of your posts that you are being honest?
Yes, because I don't talk about music dishonestly/ironically irl OR on the internet. And since the default posting tone on 4chan in general is total irony, imo it's worth pointing out.

>>74449105
Speaking of Turing tests...

>>74447252

I like the album.

I often play it.

>>74448334
>Does she ever play anything off this album live?
Maybe on her very early shows. But other than that, she pretty much ignored anything pre-Visions. Lately, she started appreciating her older work, so maybe she will perform some song from GP/Halfaxa/Darkbloom on her future shows.

>its cool to have a preference!!! i mean now that time is passing i see why people r so attached to the earlier works. they sound like nothing else, and i'm realizing that my true goal is to make something that sounds like nothing else. i needed to make art angels to prove my skills but now i want to integrate the skills w the creative approach i took on earlier alvums. sorry if i was defensive of AA when it first came out there was just sooooo much pressure coming from label fans everybody and i was too tired to properly internalize it all. appreciate ur consistent fandom over the years xxxx

>>74450087
Why is her writing style so autistic?

>>74450160
she's a sjw millenial. Expect anything else from such an obnoxious personality type?

>>74448939
But we already know that you're being honest. It's just an addition to posts at this point.

File: 1497320288974.png (889KB, 663x868px) Image search: [Google]

889KB, 663x868px

>>74449957

>>74450275
She looks like she played too much Doom imo

Who's the special guest? Your older brother or something?

>>74449105
>grimesfags do not exist on /mu/ or anywhere from what i am seeing.
That's right. They don't exist. Grimes fans on the other hand...

>>74449957
>retarded post

>>74450160
It's not autistic, just very efficient. Perhaps from too much Twitter. You could understand everything she says despite the abbreviations and the lack of proper capitalization.

>>74450174
>obnoxious personality type
Speak for yourself, alt-right dip. There's a reason why people love her: great music and nice personality.

>>74450356
Grimesfags = Grimesfans

>>74450160
Tries too hard to be understood and distances herself from people

>>74450440
Do you have brain rot? Why do you keep shitting this nonsense? Get help.

>>74450446
No. Grimesfags don't exist (except in the mind of her dumb haters like you), Grimesfans exist. Learn the difference and use the correct term.

>>74450505
>the correct term
And what makes your term any more correct, other than that it doesn't hurt your very sensitive ego?

>>74450429
>>74450441
>>74450469
>>74450356
Man, I'm not really fond of classical music anon, but I prefer him million times more than this mentally ill, obnoxius, spergtastic, obsessive grimesfag that's present in every thread about her in known universe. Seek help, moron.

>>74450605
This, I was just waiting for him to finally arrive to the thread and start with his bullshit as usual, lol

File: file.png (6KB, 377x154px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 377x154px

>>74450605
I don't give a fuck about your preferences and about your opinions about me. If you dislike me you have 2 options: 1. ignore my posts 2. get the fuck out of here. Your choice, pleb.

>>74450643
(You)

>>74450643
>tells others to ignore his post
>when a post criticizes him he cries about it
like pottery

>>74450628
I discuss her music, you fat clown. I'm not interested - I repeat - I'm not interested in your meta bullshit. Discuss this artist or leave.

>>74450677
I break your stupid pottery.

>>74450705
hi choaaa ^___^

>>74450705
B A S E D
A
S
E
D

>>74450720
Very similar to what a petulant child would do. Suits you well.

>>74450705
Keep this Choa for yourself, bro. No one likes her except you.

>>74450758
Whatever. It's my style.

>>74450690
You do realize it's impossible to doscuss this artist with someone as retarded as you - I repeat - you? If you showed any decent human characteristics, it would be easier.

>>74450790
Don't talk to me about decency when - I'm sure as hell - you posted a lot of shady stuff on this board and when you just called me retarded. Do you talk about "decent human characteristics" while you call people retards on internet? That's rich as fuck. I'm open to discussion related to her music but be decent and I'll be decent.

>>74450790
As a matter of fact where is your music discussion ITT? Do you post here only for Yous?

>>74450893
Don't talk to me about decency when - I'm sure as hell - you posted a lot of shady stuff on this board and when you just called him a fat clown. Do you talk about "decent human characteristics" while you call people fat on internet? That's rich as fuck. I'm open to discussion related to her music but be decent and I'll be decent.

Hello

>>74450956
Shitty rebuttal. You whined about "decent human characteristics". Before judging others, look in your mirror. You'll have the surprise to see an asshole in that mirror.

>>74451028
You started the indecency bud.
>>74450441
and
>>74450441

>>74451071
meant to post >>74450469

>>74451071
I didn't. That was my reaction to some very indecent posts. That crap is usually written by alt right dipshits. I completely disagree with that and I expressed my honest opinion. It's not my problem if you can't deal with my opinions. Life is tough.

>>74451071
Anyway you called me a retard. You have ZERO rights to lecture me about human decency. Now let's go back to discussing Geidi Primes like decent human beings.

>>74451193
Nothing was rude about >>74450440. In fact, he's probably joking around. YOU were the first one to be indecent. I don't see a problem with it, but you certainly do yet you exhibit those qualities yourself.
Also, I love how you've tried to change the argument from "you were indecent before me" to "hurr it doesn't matter if I was indecent". As subtle as a bull in a china shop.

>>74451275
>Nothing was rude about >>74450440.
LOL. Are you serious? 4chan really made you lose your humanity if you believe that's even acceptable.
>Also, I love how you've tried to change the argument from "you were indecent before me" to "hurr it doesn't matter if I was indecent". As subtle as a bull in a china shop.
See this >>74451269 and keep your mouth shut.

>>74451342
>I have no argument: the post
You also must be REALLY stupid if you think that I'm an anon that called you a retard, since here, >>74450956, I referred to that anon as "him" not "me". At least read posts thoroughly.

>>74447765
>Anyone notice the disapperance of the /grimes/ generals lately?
They just took a break until she releases new musique. Enjoy it while you can.

>>74451398
>trying to move the goalposts
Now do you claim that you didn't say that? I'm not convinced. Just let it go.

>>74451415
This is permanent

>>74451520
Never say never

>>74451452
How am I moving the goalposts? Also, explain why any anon would speak in the third person for no reason. I only didn't tell you because I held out hope that you might be smart enough to figure it out yourself. Tragically, I was wrong.

>>74451550
Nothing good has ever happened to me

>>74451550
I used to come here to escape an abusive environment but now

>>74451576
>Also, explain why any anon would speak in the third person for no reason.
To obfuscate his real intentions and his identity? Nothing surprise me.
>I only didn't tell you because I held out hope that you might be smart enough to figure it out yourself.
Give me a break. Anyone could pretend anything. I trust no one here.

>>74451648
Annoy /mu/ enough and the mods will ban your entire IP range. You lack decency.

>>74451690
This is a site people post child porn, who gives a fuck about some kpop artist.

>>74451663
>someone mysteriously spoke in third person just so he would not be the one who did something that already isn't bad
I think you might be a paranoid schizophrenic, anon.

>>74451784
Speak for yourself and cut the crap.

>>74451663
>I trust no one here.
Then don't expect people to take you seriously.

>>74451836
I don't expect that. But you take me way too seriously.

>>74450160
>>74450174
Her mom dropped her on her head when she was little. I'm not making this up.

Also, she's recovering hard sciences major, and those types are NEVER very good at writing anything out properly.

>>74450218
Who is 'we'?

>>74452205
>Who is 'we'
The people of this general. Or "me" and I wanted to be cool.

>>74452441
4chan is a registration-less message board system. Meaning that there is no way to know for certain whether you are interacting with veteran posters or new/long-gone but returning posters in these threads. Therefore, if you want to be understood by everyone in a thread, you must always write under the assumption that everyone else around you is new.

>>74453490
Adding "to be honest" to your post does not add any legitimacy to your post considering the vast usage of the term ironically. You'd have the same success rate with it as you would without it, hence why it's a useless term to add.

>>74453539
Not that anon but it's pathetic to whine about someone's writing style. Do you want anyone to talk in the same way to you?

I like this music discussion in this music thread on this music board. This is great.

>>74453672
That's nice that you like this music discussion in this music thread on this music board, but where is your actual contribution ITT?

>>74453599
If my writing style was stupid and only served to distract people from the points I tried to make, then yes I would like someone to talk to me and tell me why.

>>74454012
That's stupid. The ideas are more important than any writing style. To complain about someone's writing style is obnoxious, lame and tactless.

>>74454069
>makes an argument
>that's stupid
Please respond to me when you have an argument and can explain your post
>the ideas are more important
Exactly! So if the writing style distracts from the idea, it should be critiqued and fixed, no?

>>74447252
lol talking to yourself OP?
and i know that was YOU acting weird on my instagram
lol dudes from /mu/ treating me like i'm fucking selena gomez
you're blocked and my insta is private to keep you doofuses off my shit

I really like her vocals on Rosa, I wish she sung like that more often.

>>74455345
Yes, her more relaxed, natural voice is superb.

>>74447252
im going to hit grimes with a hammer

>>74456065
Did you listen to her song Heartbeats? This is what you're looking for.

>>74447252
gambanga dn the song before that are great

>>74456086
You again, ffs. Stop.

>>74456124
see
>>74456086

>>74447252
>grimesposting

go back to tumblr please sage'd

>>74456100
Yeah, I like the demo version better than the Daytrotter Session version.

She should definitely do more songs in that vocal style.

>>74447397
>>74447662
grimes using adderal to make stim music good for ripping fat lines to only makes me love her more

File: frank herbert-dune.jpg (50KB, 398x640px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 398x640px

>>74447252

I do like this album and I play it a lot.

It's naive and cute and has some pretensions. Reminded me of the Cocteau Twins when I first heard it. Still does sometimes.

I liked the Dune references too. Great book. Wondered if Grimes was trying to make a political point with it, but don't care.

>>74456703
>Wondered if Grimes was trying to make a political point with it, but don't care.
She talked a bit about Dune being concerned with the environment before it was cool.

>>74447434
honestly i wish she had made another album like this just not in garage band. the guitar on rosa and grisgris in general sounds corny but other wise i really like what she was trying to go for on the album, gambang and zoal are great

>>74457060
>honestly i wish she had made another album like this just not in garage band
She lacked superior production skills at that time. After she improved her skills she changed her style. Geidi Primes will remain unique maybe forever.

>>74456784

Ah yes. Searched and got this:

" Herbert used this planet (Geidi Prime) as an allegory warning against the potential costs and dangers of running a military–industrial complex driven by fear and greed"

Published in 1965

>>74457258
Dune was ahead of its time. I've seen the film: it's pretty good. Apparently a remake is filmed now.