Why is modern classical so shit? It sounds like confused noise.

We all know (((who))) is behind this. Post WW2 "art" was a mistake.

sorry you guys are such terminal plebs

>>74373371

Bach sounds like confused noise. It's just random noodling with no rhyme or purpose. Get a bunch of random instruments going up and down scales and you get a Bach piece. Classical music only started getting good when Mozart was invented and realized you need real melodies to make good music.

>>74373675
oh dear, you're even more retarded than OP

>>74373371
you mean sybelius and the bruch ?

>>74373723
probably just bait, here enjoy this great performance

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9D-98xB7Rzk

File: art_of_fugue.jpg (2MB, 7500x9500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 7500x9500px

>>74373371
>confused

I blame Boulez and Schonberg

File: 1487050506441.jpg (78KB, 750x715px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 750x715px

>>74373675
>When Mozart was invented

i bet OP listens to hanz zimmer

>>74373371
Yeah, Po-Mo is shit. Luckily John Adams has saved music and the modern opera.

>>74375033
This. The epitome of "different for the sake of it".

>>74375436
Hallelujah

>>74373371
If you want good modern classical music, turn to movie and video game scores to be honest.
Listen to Bloodborne Suite and tell me that isn't a great piece of music.

>>74376800
lol

>>74376800
lol

>>74376800
This. Unfortunately, this is where most good "classical" is directed, even if around here it is looked down upon for being "video game music so it's stupid".
Actual "modern classical" is mostly garbage. If you want actual classical, and actual good music, you need to listen to old stuff. Especially old recordings.

>>74373371
Here's some modern classical that is not confused noise:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PzSlmWQuHFw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05n91td5Q8I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPYGRfzfBew
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5lgAUHVFC4

Contemporary classical encompasses an incredibly wide variety of styles. Each composer does something different. Ferneyhough does things that plebs think sound like confused noise (although his music is actually excellent if you look closely at it), while Einaudi writes simple and easy to digest music that plebs can enjoy.

In the 19th and 20th century music changed forever, just like our lives have changed forever by scientific thought, electricity, computers and the internet.
You essentially need to re-think what makes music music if you want to appreciate the 20th century composers Schoenberg or Stockhausen. You shouldn't go into listening to their music looking for a memorable tune or a chord progression you can understand. You should go in expecting an experience. You will hear interesting and unusual sounds and combinations of timbres and rhythms you may not have heard before. You will be challenged and most likely not like it to start with, that or say "it just sounds like horror movie music", even though its the other way around: horror movie composers looked back at the early 20th century composers for their inspiration.

>Who's fault is this?
Yours for expecting modern classical to sound the same as music written in a time when horses and carriages were the primary means of transportation, bacteria and hygiene weren't understood, and people wore powdered wigs.