>He said: "The music is hugely important to me. It may sound daft to say, but over the years I maybe haven't taken quite enough credit for it. I think the idea that Rick and David particularly tried to sell me in the band, when I was a young man, was that I was a bit of a headmaster but I shouldn't bother myself with music because I wasn't musical. It's absolute crap. I'm twice the musician either of those guys ever were. I just am. I've got it in me."
>I'm twice the musician either of those guys ever were.
What an absolute fucking cunt. His last album was complete shit compared to Gilmour's most recent effort.
What the fuck is he smoking?
idk but he got it from Phil Collins
Animals [Columbia, 1977]
This has its share of obvious moments. But I can only assume that those who accuse this band of repetitious cynicism are stuck in such a cynical rut themselves that a piece of well-constructed political program music--how did we used to say it?--puts them uptight. Lyrical, ugly, and rousing, all in the right places. B+
The Wall [Columbia, 1979]
For a dumb tribulations-of-a-rock-star epic, this isn't bad--unlikely to arouse much pity or envy, anyway. The music is all right, too--kitschy minimal maximalism with sound effects and speech fragments. But the story is confused, "mother" and "modern life" make unconvincing villains, and if the recontextualization of "up against the wall" is intended ironically, I don't get it. B-
>>74273943
HAH!
The only redeeming thing about Pink Floyd is that it allowed Gilmour to set up Kate Bush's career
>>74274048
this
>>74273958
how pretentious can one faggot be?