>He doesn't listen exclusively to adult contemporary

Do I look like I work in a fucking dentist's office?

>>74266062
That's old. Dentist office-core today is Top 40 pop from 2009.

>>74266062
I went to the dentist the other day and he was playing Fats Waller throughout the treatment.

File: image:11345.jpg (22KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 400x400px

>he unironically listens to that and enjoy it to the point he believes his music taste is superior

wtf is adult contemporary? porn music?

>>74266221
yes

>adult contemporary
What does juvenile contemporary sound like?

Josh Groban is low key actually pretty damn good though.

File: 1471851030292.jpg (29KB, 640x519px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 640x519px

>>74266233
Forgot my frog

>>74266022

adult contemporary is legit. lots of good songs by good songwriters, without the added desire to try and be "cool" like younger artists.

Most popular music is written for people 12-25. I always hated that.

The real depth is in what adults have to say about their lives.

>>74266221
Dido

>>74266221

Sting is a good example.

It's pop music written for adults, 25+.

File: 1501017282666.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>74266022
>easy listening

>>74266358
sounds like the "IDM" of the pop/singer-songwriter sphere. pretentious name that doesn't describe anything real about the music but purports to position itself as superior

>>74266385

No, you're wrong. It is a marketing term created by record labels in the 90's to distinguish adult pop from pop music for teenagers. That's it.

VH1 used to play adult contemporary, while MTV played the rest.

>>74266385

It's actually a derisive term for the most part. Definitely not pretentious.

It's not a cool thing to say you like.