I'm gonna miss him when he finally croaks. Not only was

Why was he the best Beatle?

>>74184072
It's subjective of course, but he wrote better songs than Lennon out of the pair.

Also, he wasn't a douche like Lennon was.

File: 1500981594969.jpg (418KB, 1978x2048px) Image search: [Google]

418KB, 1978x2048px

Ringo is best beatle.

I'll be sadder when Stan Lee dies.

>>74184088
McCartney is a douche, but not in the same way that Lennon was.

>>74184104
Replacing Pete Best is not an achievement.

>>74184117
>McCartney is a douche
How so?

>>74184164
Not who you replied to, but I heard he was always trying to get credit for songs he didn't write. Not sure if this is true, hoping someone can confirm this?

>>74184050
You mean his replacement, don't you?
Remember that the REAL Paul McCartney was killed in an automobile accident in 1966.

>>74184104
He and George are tied for first place in my book.

>>74184207
Lennon and McCartney had an unwritten agreement between the two of them that all of their compositions while in The Beatles would be credited Lennon-McCartney. McCartney has since released live albums that have songs that were either entirely or primarily written by him where they say it was just written by him. I doubt Lennon would care t.bh

George had the best solo career and was the best Beatle,try again

>>74184050
You're damn right. Ram and Band on the Run are better than any Beatles album.

File: ringo starr.jpg (39KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 200x200px

>>74184104
this

>>74184164
Whoever posted that is misinformed. Paul was just the most conservative of the Beatles, and that was seen as being really square back in the late 60s/70s.

>>74184783
>74184783
yes this

File: 1499520378925.png (82KB, 618x636px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 618x636px

>>74184104
100000% accurate