Albums that get an unnecessarily bad rep because of their members' actions
>bands that get an unnecessarily bad rep because scaruffi said mercury rev was better
>>74074570
what members actions give this record a bad rep?
>>74074588
I love Mercury Rev but their body of work is nowhere near the lips, even if /mu/ loves a good contrarian, that is wrong
>>74074595
wayne's kind of a dick
>>74074673
You are wrong. David Baker era Mercury Rev is far better.
>>74074693
Yerself Is Steam and Boces are my favorite MR releases too, but the Lips were just prolific enough with their rough noise pop stuff to sway me, it's not like the lips were playing it safe those days anyway
>>74074673
>wayne's kind of a dick
dude an overgrown baby, basically the adult version of a middle-school tumblr drama queen, where they "live their art" and are too delusional, and think their too deep for everyone else just because everyone else thinks their a jackass
>>74074673
>>74074693
Rev '91-'95 > Lips '90-'96 > Lips '97-'06 > Rev '96-'01 > Lips '84-'89 > Lips '06-Present > all other Mercury Rev
>>74074756
this isn't wrong
I prefer the soft bulletin where not only were they forced to change their sound, but did it in the only way they knew how (partly in thanks to mercury rev) but were also in absolute fucking turmoil and had basically no chance of success, but their last ditch attempt actually worked
>>74074756
Honestly, I want to hate Wayne because of his ridiculous antics, but every time I see an interview with him he just seems like such a nice guy
>>74074570
I just can't seem to get into his voice...
>>74074855
>he just seems like such a nice guy
he's a performance artist, of course he's going to smile for the camera, i don't think he's bad at heart or anything, i like the flaming lips, just kinda an annoying dick who feeds off attention.