Reminder that if your RYM ratings don't look like a pyramid

>>73992604
Ew get this nasty curve away from me.

>>73992604
Having a curve like this automatically makes you almost as annoying as >>73992635

>>73992635
>>73992650
I bet you think most music is "average"
that's not how average works in terms of quality

Stop making this thread

File: goodratingsystem.png (31KB, 905x346px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 905x346px

Reminder that the best rating system is aqam's

>>73992604
What I can tell you is that this person has never had sex before and I will not adhere to a virginal scale

>>73992671
too late

>>73992728
>I don't like person x therefore they're a virgin
Why do you think like a female?

File: lb.png (552B, 190x55px) Image search: [Google]

552B, 190x55px

I believe any ratings should look something like this
Maybe a little smaller on the high end.

how do you give the ratings labels like that

>>73992778
https://rateyourmusic.com/account/rating_system

File: curve.png (40KB, 904x509px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 904x509px

if it aint like this ur dum

File: raty.jpg (74KB, 1794x519px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 1794x519px

>>73992604

I got you senpai

>>73992803

>4 lowest ratings might as well be the same rating
>Less room to distinguish good works

good job retard

>>73992814
>implying there is good music

>>73992807
>unrated

>>73992999
There must always be one

>>73992661

Not if you listen to music you like rather than seeking out every shitty album ever made

>>73992791
thank you anon

>>73993020
If you automatically like everything from a familiar artist or genre you're a retard with no standards

Really though the weird thing is that people have a compulsion to file every single thing they listen to into whatever point scale it is they using, 5-100, whatever it is, it's weird that people listen to so much music and the only significant thing they can pull out of it is what number it is.