Wtf this is sooooooooo much better than In The Court Of

>>73943727
it's just more accesible

>>73943784
it sounds like a 90s math rock/post hardcore album

>>73943727
*Deletes Red*

>>73943784
The court is pretty accessible, cmon. The only hard song for a newcomer is the improvisation part on Moonchild, imo. Anyway>>73943727 ITCOTCK is a god tier album

File: Islands.jpg (181KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1000x1000px

Wtf this is sooooooooo much better than both

>>73943727
I think Red is pretty sonically different compared to ITCOTCK. To me, Red seems a lot heavier, while ITCOTCK is a little more subtle and mellow.

File: 51hOGBVLqAL.jpg (44KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 500x500px

This is objectively (subjectively) the only good album they have made and all they did was rip off talking heads

>>73944494
bOI

File: Larks_tongues_in_aspic_album_cover.jpg (58KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 300x300px

>>73945056
>>73944593
>>73943727
WOAH this is objectively and indisputably the greatest King Crimson album

>>73946667
I can relate to this

>>73945056
That and Brian Eno.

Yeah. Court is really overrated.

>>73946667
It's the King Crimsony-est King Crimson album
I still prefer Red just slightly, but Larks' Tongues is a better representation of their music

>>73945056
As someone who has only listened to In The Court of the Crimson King and Red, can I jump straight into Discipline? Or would it be better to listen another album, or albums, before?

You going to start this thread everyday now? I'm guessing you just discovered King Crimson a week ago.

>>73947640
yeah you can just jump to it. just listen to it. if you like it, the two albums that come right after are similar sounding and the three form kind of a trilogy of some sort.

>>73946667
Larks Tongues > In The Court > Red > Discipline > ...