Alright, lets settle this once and for all /mu/. Two albums enter,

pet sounds is better and it's not even close

"Tomorrow Never Knows" is the best song on either, but Pet Sounds doesn't have a mound of unlistenable bullshit in the middle and also doesn't have completely uneven musical styles

>>73889511
Every Beatles album from A Hard Day's Night through Let It Be is better than Pet Sounds.

>>73889511
One of my favorite songs of all time is on Revolver, and I'm not even one of the people who hate Yellow Submarine, but I'd still say Pet Sounds.

>>73889535
The only thing thats unlistenable on "Revolver" is "Yellow Submarine"

pet sounds is probably better but tomorrow never knows trumps it

>>73889672
Yellow Submarine wouldn't be out of place on SMiLE to be honest

>>73889511
Revolver by a shitload. Pet Sounds is overrated pop trash. Surfs Up is wayyy better then pet sounds.

>>73889634
>delusional beatlesfag

>>73889697
Yeah the song isn't overtly terrible, it just interrupts what is otherwise a fantastic album

>>73889634
Pet Sounds vs all Beatles albums from Rubber Soul to Abbey Road.

Abbey Road > Pet Sounds = Sgt Pepper > Rubber Soul >>> Revolver > The White Album

Opinions?

>>73889762
I actually think "The White Album" is The Beatles best. Or at least its my personal favorite.

>>73889714
t. beach boys fag that pretends that all their irrelevant shit is 'good' (holland, wild honey, holland, summer days)

TNK is an annoying song IMO, For No One is my favorite from Revolver. Pet Sounds is a fine album but greatly overrated. So is Revolver I'd say, but I'll pick that over Pet Sounds. '''Freak Out''' by the Mothers kills both easily if we're talking rock albums from '66

pet sounds is obviously better what even is this discussion

>>73889732
WE COME ON THE SLOOP JOHN B

File: revolver.png (165KB, 1326x279px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 1326x279px

>>73889535
correct
>>73889672
but what about all the other shitty songs to give breaks between the """"""experimental""""" tracks

Revolver, it has more varied styles and is better than Sgt Pepper's too

>>73889862
freak out is barely rock

>>73889828
I just gave it another listen today, and I really like some of the songs (Back in the USSR, Dear Prudence, While My Guitar Gently Weeps, Happiness Is A Warm Gun, Martha My Dear, I Will), it's a miserable experience to listen to all the way through imo. I have a feeling that's not the point, so if the point is to pick highlights and ignore the shit songs, then yes, it's a great album. And I'm definitely not saying it's bad, it's just my least favourite.

>>73889908
what would you call it?

File: IMG_2945.jpg (188KB, 1024x709px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1024x709px

>>73889874
>I Want To Tell You
>1.5 stars

>>73889908
>probably the most influential rock record of the 60s for its significance in sending rock down a river of exciting experimentation
>barely rock

>>73889923
it's more rock in the 1950s way than it is in a 'taxman' way

>all these rockists hating on yellow submarine
I'd rather listen to it in the middle of the album rather than listen to an album full of samey lyrical content and musical clichés

>>73889957
Just b/c Frankie loved doo-wop and had a sense of humor in integrating into his songs, doesn't make this a '50s record. What's "50s" about "Who are the Brain Police", "Help I'm a Rock" for example?

imo both are the best albums of each artist. altough pet sounds is better

>>73889927
listened again and i was very harsh
gonna give it a 6

>>73889999
Quads of reevaluation

>>73889985
samefagging to say that I do understand what you mean, but I think my original post of calling it "rock" maybe begged an unimportant question that doesn't mean much. The Mothers are the Mothers and the Beatles are the Beatles. Gengre-scrutiny is kinda a boring black hole to go down.

>>73889973
Octopuses' Garden is the GOAT Ringo aquatic suite, anyway ;)