>>73840172
same guy from this thread. thinking about using the name "cyanotypes". what does /mu/ think?
>>73846628
singular is better for that name imo
you could come up with literally anything and it would be better than cyanotypes
>>73846805
true but singular is taken
>>73846860
lol fair opinion. it could be shortened or simplified. I'm leaning towards something iron-related tho, and I liked that cyanotypes evoked that engineer-y blueprint feel