Britbong here, I went into this thinking "oh now i'm

>>73827015
Why did oasis get all the attention in the u.s. during the height of britpop? There were so many that were better.......,is it just because they were the loudest and fought with each other all the time?

>>73827015
post-knebworth is basically
>man we're the biggest band in the fookin world, let's do all these drugs and put out a new album
>well shit i guess people are tired of the whole oasis bit huh lads, say why don't we shake things up a bit? by the way bonehead and guigs you two can fuck off
>well shit that was all a bit crap wasn't it, oh well let's regroup and make another album
>well shit that was all a bit crap wasn't it, oh well let's regroup and make another album...again
>well shit this one turned out quite ok, let's regroup and make another album
>well shit this one isn't bad either, mayb--
>well shit the brothers are fighting again
>well shit noel just broke up the band
>well shit, let's start a bunch of half-baked solo careers, andy you can reform ride
like apart from liam getting a) divorced around the 2000 wembley gigs and b) his teeth kicked out in 2002 there's nothing docu-worthy, just a band of millionaires grinding it out on tour and putting out decidedly average music

>>73827681
>is it just because they were the loudest and fought with each other all the time?
yeah the brothers had fun tabloid-worthy personalities, plus they were probably the only group that could appeal to americans anyway. yanks don't know what bow bells or bank holidays are